100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
OV aantekeningen HC en boek Deeltentamen 2 $7.04   Add to cart

Class notes

OV aantekeningen HC en boek Deeltentamen 2

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

OV aantekeningen HC en boek Deeltentamen 2

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • December 11, 2021
  • 7
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • -
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Criteria for the evaluation of social research:
- Reliability > repeatable & consistent
- Replicability > replicate the findings of others
- Validity > integrity of the conclusions
o Measurement validity > whether a measure that is devised for a concept really does
reflect the concept that it is supposed to be denoting
o Internal validity > whether a conclusion that incorporates a causal relationship
between two or more variables holds water
o External validity > whether the results of a study can be generalized beyond the
specific research context
o Ecological validity > whether social scientific findings are applicable to
people’s everyday, natural social settings
o Inferential validity > whether the authors of a report of research produce inferences
and draw conclusions that are warranted by their research and findings generated
from it

> criteria mainly for quantitative research, qualitative researchers propose different criteria:
- Trustworthiness > criterion of how good a qualitative study is:
o Credibility > parallels with internal validity: how believable are findings
o Transferability > parallels with external validity: do the findings apply to other
contexts
o Dependability > parallels reliability: are the findings likely to apply at other times
o Confirmability > parallels objectivity: has the investigator allowed his/her values to
intrude to a high degree
- Authenticity > concerning broader political impact of research
o Fairness > does the research fairly represent different viewpoints among members of
the social setting?
o Ontological authenticity > does the research help members to arrive at a better
understanding of their social milieu?
o Educative authenticity > does the research help members to appreciate better the
perspectives of other members of their social setting?
o Catalytic authenticity > has the research acted as an impetus to members to engage
in action to change their circumstances?
o Tactical authenticity > has the research empowered members to take the steps
necessary for engaging in action?

Other qualitative:

- Reliability and validity:
 External reliability > the degree to which a study can be replicated (= difficult)
 Internal reliability > whether, when there is more than one observer, members of the
research team agree about what they see and hear
 External validity > whether there is a correspondence between researchers’
observations and the theoretical ideas they develop
 Internal validity > the degree to which findings can be generalized across social
settings

, Criteria for indicators:
- Reliability > consistency of a measure of a concept. 3 factors involved:
 Stability > stable over time? Results do not fluctuate
 Internal reliability > are the indicators that make up the scale consistent?
 Inter-rater reliability > subjective judgement involved: lack of consistency in their
decisions
- Measurement validity > refers to the issue of whether an indicator that is devised to gauge a
concept really measures that concept. Establishing validity:
 Face validity > the measure apparently reflects the content of the concept in
question
 Concurrent validity > the researcher employs a criterion on which cases are known to
differ and that is relevant to the concept in question
 Predictive validity > researcher uses a future criterion measure, rather than a
contemporary one
 Construct validity > researcher is encouraged to deduce hypotheses from a theory
that is relevant to the concept
 Convergent validity > the validity of a measure ought to be gauged by comparing it to
measures of the same concept developed through other methods



Variables:
Dichotomous > nominal > ordinal > interval/ratio



Averages:
- Mean > gemiddelde
- Median > mid-point
- Mode > most frequent



Kwalitatief > verband tussen variabelen

Kwantitatief > achterliggende gedachtes achterhalen

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ehouwy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.04. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.04
  • (0)
  Add to cart