Essay
Criminal Law Omissions Discussion
- Course
- Institution
The law of omissions should remain the same so people are not charged for actions that they didn't do. Discussion.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
mayaharrison
Content preview
Criminal Law: Omissions Essay‘Omissions should not be criminalised to a greater extent than they already are.’
Should I be labelled a murderer for a crime I did not commit? Should I also be forced to
serve strangers I have never met before? You might be thinking, “obviously not”.
Omissions is the failure to perform an act agreed to, where there is a duty to an
individual or the public to act. Generally, omissions are not criminalised in the English
law but when there is a special duty to act then there is an exemption. At present, there
is only liability when there is a duty to act such as a contractual duty, a statutory duty, an
assumed duty, etc. For example, a failure to perform an assumed duty involving a
parent-child relationship would lead to criminalisation as in the case of R v GIBBONS &
PROCTOR. The defendant was convicted of murder as a result of failing to feed his
child. In that kind of situation, it makes sense that the omission was criminalised
however attempting to extend liability for a failure to act for the general public is absurd
as here as we owe no duty to strangers. Liability for omissions should not be extended
further than it already is.
A general duty to act would breach our autonomy which is an essential principle in the
English Law. Autonomy allows people to make decisions they want and live freely
however creating a general duty to act would restrict people’s freedom and force
unwilling rescue missions. Picture this, you’re in a supermarket, you see someone enter
an epileptic shock, bump their head and retain damage. A general duty to act would
hold you liable for the harm the victim faced. That sounds completely unfair, why should
the law force you to save a stranger and penalise you for an action you’re in no control
of? Just as J. Paul McCutcheon said that the “function of the criminal law is to penalise
and deter the infliction of harm, not to compel or encourage the doing of good”. As
McCutcheon said society already teaches “good” with the use of religion and education;
and emergency services already exist therefore the law should focus on punishing
harm. McCutcheon states that no one has a right to be rescued and it seems
unreasonable that the law should require any person to endanger their lives for the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mayaharrison. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now