100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary contract $9.78   Add to cart

Summary

Summary contract

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of 5 pages for the course Contract at UoW (estoppel)

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • December 17, 2021
  • 5
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Promissory Estoppel
Chen - Wishart Ch 3 - see 3.3

Changing contracts
- The doctrine of consideration is a common law doctrine
- It is applicable to the making of contracts
- AND
- It is applicable to the variation of contracts

Promises of more money
- More money for no more work;
- Stilk v Myrick
- More money for more work;
- Hartley v ponsonby

Williams v Roffey
- More money for no more work
- But an additional practical benefit over and above the work done

Debts
- A debt is a contractual obligation to pay a certain sum of money
- Any agreement to vary the sum to be paid would need consideration at common law

Pinnel’s case 1602
- The payment of a lesser sum on the day in satisfaction of a greater is no satisfaction of the whole
- “... the gift of a horse, hawk or robe, etc in satisfaction is good. For it shall be intended that a horse, hawk, or
robe, etc might be more beneficial to the plaintiff than the money..”

Foakes v beer (1884)
- “.. all men of business.. Do everyday recognise and act on the ground that prompt payment of a part of their
demand may be more beneficial to them than it would be to insist on their rights and enforce payment of the
whole. Even where the debtor is perfectly solvent, and sure to pay at the lase, this is often so. Where the credit
of the debtor is doubtful it must be more so”
- Lord Blackburn

MWB v Rock
- Pinnel's case and Foakes v Beer are still good law! It's not the money
- An additional practical benefit over and about the money paid can be consideration
- The gift of the horse, hawk or robe is no different in principle from the conferral of a benefit or advantage -
practical benefit sought by MWB in keeping rock in the premises - but SC said just because a practical
advantage, the CA were wrong to find it contractually Binding.

, Case Did the promisee do consideration why?
more?

Stilk No No No added benefit for new promise

Hartley Yes Yes Added benefit directly from promisee for new
promise

Roffey No Yes Practical benefit derived (but not directly from
promisee)

Pinnel No No No added benefit

Foakes No No No added benefit

Re selectmove No No No added benefit

MWB v Rock No No - SC Practical benefits not recognised as consideration


Estoppel
- Equity’s answer to changing existing contracts
- ‘... equity may be described as that part of the law which, immediately prior to the coming into force of the
supreme court of judicature acts 1873 and 1875 on 1 november 1875, was enforced exclusively in the court of
chancery and not at all in the courts of common law, common pleas, exchequer and kings bench’
- Philip H Pettit, equity and the law of trusts - (12th edn OUP 2012)
By the end of the fourteenth century, petitions began to be addressed to the chancellor alone seeking a different
answer to the common law answer
- ‘... new law was being created and it was this new law that became known as ‘equity’, in contrast to the
common law dispensed in the common law courts’ - Pettit

Equity Prevails
- If equity and the common law were in conflict legal supremacy was vested in chancery and not the common law
courts
- ‘... equity (turned) into a system of law almost as fixed and rigid as the rules of the common law’ - pettit

Equity
- Since the judicature acts (1873-5) ‘the two streams of jurisdiction, though they run in the same channel, run side
by side and do not mingle their waters…’
- Ashburner’s principles of equity, 2nd ed (1933), p.18

So two systems
- Separates
- All in one box

Same box different systems
- Common law
- Equity
They don't work in the same way

Denning J
Central london property trust v high trees house (1947) KB 130
- Rent £2,500 p.a for block of flats

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller vickyhoney. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.78
  • (0)
  Add to cart