100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary contract law $9.78   Add to cart

Summary

Summary contract law

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of 3 pages for the course Contract at UoW (intention)

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • December 17, 2021
  • 3
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Intention to Create legal relations

Chen-wishart ch. 2 - 2.7

Was it intended
- Carlill v carbolic smoke ball co
- An objective test
- What a reasonable reader would think

‘It seems to me that in order to arrive at a right conclusion we must read this advertisement in its plain meaning, as the
public would understand it’
‘ i think it was intended to be understood by the public as an offer which was to be acted upon
- Bown LJ

More Objectivity
Balfour v Balfour
- Nobody would suggest in ordinary circumstances that those agreements result in what we know as a contract

2 types of case
- A; social or domestic arrangements
- B; business arrangements

2 types of presumption
- A;domestic so not intended to be legally binding
- B; business so is intended to be legally binding

The Domestic Presumption
Balfour v Balfour - While Husband & Wife – H promised allowance to W – not legally binding

Domestic
Coward v M.I.B - petrol money paid from time to time - unlikely that either party contemplated that there was any
legally binding agreement
Albert v M.I.B - understood by all that passengers would make a payment - beyond mere social kindness = legal relations

Only a Presumption
Hadley v KEmp
- Close knit group of friends
- band not just for the business but also because they loved what they were doing:
- promise not made with an intention to create legal relations.

More Domesticity
- Jones padavatton; family arrangements in which each party trusted the other. There was a presumption against
legal instent
- BUT
- Parker v Clark - House sharing - each side had intended to create a legally binding agreement

Its all a Lottery
- Simpkins v Pays - 3 contributed to entry; fee agreed all should share equally = legal relations
- Wilson v Burnett; chat/ talk about sharing insufficient evidence, of binding agreement

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller vickyhoney. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.78
  • (0)
  Add to cart