100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Notes International and European Human Rights Law $7.00
Add to cart

Class notes

Notes International and European Human Rights Law

 113 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Notes from the course International and European Human Rights Law. It is based on the “Cases and Materials” and supplemented with what was said in class. I've only listed the judgments that the professor also mentioned.

Preview 4 out of 72  pages

  • December 27, 2021
  • 72
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Professor lemmens
  • All classes
avatar-seller
International and European Human Rights Law

Class 1

Exam:

 Texts can be used
 Cases and materials cannot be used
 2 questions
o Open question: essay-question
o Case
 Arguments of state
 Arguments of applicant
 Argue as the court
 => violation or not and why
 References to cases!

1. Fundamental rights

 Human rights are used in various contexts
 Word is used by lawyers, activists, philosophers
o What there are talking about is not necessarily the same
 Rights that are so fundamental to a human being that you can’t just do them away
o Not a helpful definition to see the difference with a ‘normal’ right
o No specific criteria to what is ‘fundamental’
 It can be decided by politicians, but how do they decide?
 They are in texts that claim the rights to be human rights
 Questions on human rights are ethical questions
 It goes beyond the law
 The court can change their view because mentality’s change
o Judges take a different view at cases
o Ex. Family: a married man and woman  family: gender
doesn’t matter and it doesn’t matter if they are married
 The concept is clear, but the conceptions aren’t
 Ex. Freedom of speech, right not to be tortured, right to housing, right to having a paid
holiday, right to life
 2 theories
o They don’t exclude each other
o Classic theory
 Human rights are there to limit powers of public authorities (states)
 Limitation of state’s sovereignty
 Protection against arbitrary use of state power
 => rule of law
o Second theory
 Became popular after WOII: concept of human dignity

A. Common characteristics

 2 theories
o They don’t exclude each other
o Classic theory

1

,  Human rights are there to limit powers of public authorities (states)
 Limitation of state’s sovereignty
 Protection against arbitrary use of state power
 => rule of law
o Second theory
 Became popular after WOII: concept of human dignity
 Nazi’s: many of the crimes were lawful at that place and in that
moment
 In Belgium: since 1993 enrolled in constitution
 Part of social economic rights
 You fill a lacune by referring to ‘human dignity’
 It can soften positive law
 Human dignity sounds great, but we don’t know what is in it
 H.R.Cttee., 15 July 2002, Wackenheim v. France, no. 854/1999.
 = dwarf tossing case
 People are making fun of people with a genetic disease  morally
unacceptable
 The mayor refused the permit
o But there was no legal ground
o So he said it violated human dignity
 But who’s human dignity?
 Mr. Wackenheim (the dwarf) doesn’t agree
o It’s the way he makes money
o Human dignity is the right to choose one’s profession
 Today: voluntary prostitution
 Paul Mertens:
 As an academic: human dignity can mean anything and is far from
being helpful
 As a judge I was happy that we had human dignity, when it didn’t
have any arguments, but the law was violating basic rights
 Historical development of human rights
o Typical enlightenment right
o Human rights is concept that is created by national traditions
o Medieval charters
 They limit the power of those in power
 They grant privileges to people living in the cities
 Ex. Lowering taxes
 They don’t protect people as citizens
 They protect certain categories of people
o NO women’s rights or children’s rights
o Magna Carta (1215) (England)
 The more power the parliament has, the less power the royals have
o Charter van Kortenberg (Belgium)
o French (1789) + American (1776) Revolution
 Inspired by the same politicians
 First document using the term ‘human right’
 Le droit de l’homme


2

, o Men are born with these rights
o Et du citoyens
 = member of political community
 Community is a reality we can’t rule out
 Citizens are questioning the power of the sovereign
o How come that the ruler has the right to impose legislation
on the citizens
 Are there limits?
 Shouldn’t we rule ourselves?
 Where do they get their power from?
 Bill of Rights
o Catalogue of fundamental rights, protecting citizens against
power of rulers

B. Categories of human rights

 Individual rights and freedoms
o First generation rights: civil and political
 The first rights to be considered human rights
 Stay away-rights
 The public authorities need to stay away from personal liberty
o They can’t intervene
o Minimal state aka nachtwakersstaat
 The state does the minimal things: protection of
property, protection of personal integrity and
ministry of war
 All the other things are for the private
sphere
 Protection of home, privacy
o However poor the person may be, they are a king in their
home
 Ex. Freedom of expression, freedom of religion, habeas corpus, fair trial,
protection of property
 Criticism of Marxist thinkers, social-democrats..
 What is the value of freedom of expression for deaf people?
o Material conditions: only rights to survive are necessary
 Intervention is duty to provide  social, cultural, economic rights
o Second generation rights: economic, social and cultural
 Ex. Housing rights, right to education, right to rest, right to health care, right
to decent labour standard, right to paid holidays, right to have access to
culture
 State becomes a partner that is there to help the realisation of those rights
 Directly
o Providing the services
 Indirectly
o Other people providing the services
o Ex. KULeuven is a private university, but has public funding
 Collective rights

3

, o Third generation rights: solidarity
 Ex. Right to peace, right to environment, right to development
 Who can invoke the right? Where can you enforce it?
 Evolution
o Constitutional rights (1st)  (2nd) are added to that
 after WOII: you can’t leave the protection of human rights to states only
 If states fail to do what they are constitutionally obliged to, there should be a
place where you can go and complain
 => start of international rights
 The nation cannot contradict itself: weak argument
 Other wise we wouldn’t need a constitutional court
o It reviews legislation from the parliament against the
constitution or other higher norms + searches for violations
 => we need serious international cooperation (2 levels)
o Global level: UN
o Regional systems of human rights protection
o 2 things you need
 Standards
 Fora
 Discussion
o You should not think in terms of categorisation
 All human rights are interdependent: they are all equally important to
human beings  you cannot prefer the one over the other
o Legally speaking there is a distinction
o Conceptionally speaking there is a certain distinction
 One thing is saying to the public authorities to stay away
 Did you intervene? Yes or no? => easy
 Another thing is saying to public authorities that they are a partner
 It’s progressive realisation: you can’t except a healthcare or
educational system overnight by a state
=> we should not overstate them
 It’s a commitment of making an effort
o NOT the effort
 Budgettarian constraint
 Political decision
 Positive obligations or duties
o Ex. Right to life, right to schooling, right to housing
o BUT they cannot discriminate
o Although fundamental rights are interdependent, there are criticism but there are
differences, not highlighting them it would make it much more difficult rights why 1st
generation rights are less a matter of discussion, the differences are more outspoken
with 2nd generation rights. We are all social democrats, states have a role to play in
a socially corrected free marked, the state can intervene. It’s a European vision on
the topic, think about Obama-care, in the VS it’s much more contested. The topic is
more discussable than the fact of torture for example.

C. Are all human rights “fundamental” rights?


4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller S2001rechten. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.00  2x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added