100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary LLM International Dispute Resolution - International Commercial Arbitration II - Module 6 (Multi-Party Arbitration) $8.39   Add to cart

Summary

Summary LLM International Dispute Resolution - International Commercial Arbitration II - Module 6 (Multi-Party Arbitration)

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Single contract Procedural issues Joinder rules - National laws - Institutional rules Non-signatories Consolidation rules - National laws - Institutional rules - IBA Guidelines Enforceability of awards

Last document update: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 13  pages

  • December 30, 2021
  • August 29, 2023
  • 13
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
avatar-seller
When can multi-party arbitrations arise from a single contract?

Three (or more) parties conclude a contract that contains an arbitration clause (joint
venture/shareholders agreement/limited liability partnership agreement). A dispute arises
involving the same facts and issues between all three parties and arbitration is commenced
with all three parties from the outset.

Three (or more) parties conclude a contract that contains an arbitration clause. A dispute
arises between only two of them and arbitration is commenced. However, one of the two
parties subsequently wishes to join the remaining party to the proceedings (joinder).
Alternatively, the remaining party itself wishes to join in the arbitration (intervention).

Two parties conclude a contract that contains an arbitration clause. A dispute arises and
arbitration is commenced. One of the parties wishes to join the other’s parent company, even
though it did not sign the contract. Alternatively, it may directly go after the parent company
arguing that the parent, not the subsidiary, is the actual party to the contract.

Business people rarely think about multi-party arbitration, but instead it is the transaction that
they are trying to create and the system of dispute resolution used to respect and enforce their
agreement1. Yet awareness of multi-party arbitrations in arbitration clauses or previous
negotiations seems to be increasing2.

What procedural issues arise from multi-party arbitrations?

If two or more parties participate, this can create due process issues especially regarding
arbitrator appointments and evidence submission. This is due to the bipolar framework
involving one claimant and one respondent.

Arbitration is a consensual dispute resolution mechanism. As arbitrators’ jurisdiction derives
from the parties’ arbitration agreement, they should only bind signatories. Thus, attempting to
include non-signatories normally face the difficulty of establishing that they intended to be
bound by the arbitration agreement. Rubins considers consent as establishing ‘meeting of the
minds’, but acknowledges that contractual consent is not purely subjective, nor can it be
described as fixed and formulaic3.

There may be tribunal composition issues where there is one claimant, but two respondents,
as normally each party nominates a single arbitrator to make two arbitrators. In Dutco4, two
respondents challenged the award at ICC Court based on the fact that each of them could not
nominate the arbitrator, which violated party equality public policy principles. Institutional
rules now require all parties to jointly nominate arbitrators if they agree. If not, the institution
will appoint all three arbitrators on their behalf, with no deference towards the parties’
nominations. Whereas AAA-ICDR Rules impose an additional element in which ‘If there are
more than two parties to the arbitration, the Administrator may appoint all arbitrators unless
1
Matthew Secomb, ‘Chapter 31- Multi-party, Multi-contract Rules and the Arbitrators' Role in Finding
Consent’, in Patricia Shaughnessy and Sherlin Tung (eds), The Powers and Duties of an Arbitrator- Liber
Amicorum Pierre A. Karrer, page 328.
2
Queen Mary Interview with Matthew Secomb (Partner, White & Case LLP)
3
Noah Rubins, ‘Group of Companies Doctrine and the New York Convention’, in Enforcement of Arbitration
Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The NewYork Convention in Practice,
ed. E. Gaillard & D. di Pietro (London: Cameron May, 2008), 450.
4
Siemens AG and BKMI Industries Lagu GmbH v Dutco Construction Co. Ltd [1994] ADRLJ 36

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ayorke. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart