100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
PHI 103 week 5 quiz grade details ALL Q uestions $10.29
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Ashford University
  4.  
  5. PHI 103

Case

PHI 103 week 5 quiz grade details ALL Q uestions

1 review
 1 purchase

PHI-103 Week 5 Quiz Ashford University Grade Details - All Questions Question 1. Question : Since all philosophers are seekers of truth, it follows that no evil human is a seeker after truth, since no philosophers are evil humans. The statement, “no evil human is a seeker...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 167  pages

Document information

  • January 5, 2022
  • 167
  • 2021/2022
  • Case
  • Prof
  • A

Subjects

  • phi 103 week 5 quiz
  • question 1 question since all philosophers are seekers of truth
  • it follows that no evil human is a seeker after truth
  • since no philosophers are evil humans the statement

Written for

All documents for this subject (149)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: jnks1229 • 2 year ago

Pages are not as it seems several pages have one or two words on them and make it hard to decider what is written

Seller

avatar-seller
GradeProfessor

Reviews received

Content preview

PHI-103
PHI-103
Week 5 Quiz Ashford University
Grade Details - All Questions
Question 1. Question :
Since all philosophers are seekers of truth, it follows that no evil
human is a seeker after truth, since no philosophers are evil humans.
The statement, “no evil human is a seeker after truth,” is the conclusion.
Student Answer: InstructorTrue False
The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting
Explanation:Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 2. Question :
When disagreeing with a premise, .
Student Answer: one should point to the outcomes of the conclusion
one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.
one should attack premises that are not important to the
argument
one should point out the failings of its author
Instructor Explanation:The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by
Seeking Truth,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
[Type text] PHI-103
Question 3. Question :
I know that Stephen has a lot of money. His parents drive Mercedes. His dogs wear cashmere sweaters, and he paid cash for his Hummer.
The conclusion of the argument is .
Student Answer: His dogs wear cashmere sweaters.
I know that Stephen has a lot of money. He paid cash for his Hummer.
His parents drive Mercedes.
Instructor Explanation:The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 4. Question :
In argumentation, criticism is .
Student Answer: a negative thing that tears people down
an evaluation of elements outside of the argument
a way to make oneself look smarter than another
an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the argument
Instructor Explanation:The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by
Seeking Truth,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 5. Question :
Dogs are better than cats, since they always listen to what their masters say. They also are more fun and energetic.
The first sentence of this argument contains two premises.
Student Answer:True False
[Type text] PHI-103
InstructorThe answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting
[Type text] PHI-103
Explanation:Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 6. Question :
Which of the following is an effective way to critique a deductive argument?
Student Answer: Use the same form and create an example that has true premises
and a false conclusion.
Use a different form and create a
counterexample. Demonstrate that the deductive
argument is weak. Critique the strength of an
inductive argument.
[Type text]

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GradeProfessor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$10.29  1x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added