Case uitwerking

PHI 103 week 5 quiz grade details ALL Q uestions

Name: PHI 103 week 5 quiz grade details ALL Q uestions
SKU: doc_1472222
Rating: 1.00 (1 reviews)
Author: GradeProfessor

1 beoordeling

1 keer verkocht

Vak
PHI 103

Instelling
Ashford University

PHI-103 Week 5 Quiz Ashford University Grade Details - All Questions Question 1. Question : Since all philosophers are seekers of truth, it follows that no evil human is a seeker after truth, since no philosophers are evil humans. The statement, “no evil human is a seeker...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 167 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 5 januari 2022
Aantal pagina's 167
Geschreven in 2021/2022
Type Case uitwerking
Docent(en) Prof
Cijfer A

phi 103 week 5 quiz
question 1 question since all philosophers are seekers of truth
it follows that no evil human is a seeker after truth
since no philosophers are evil humans the statement

1 beoordeling

Door: jnks1229 • 2 jaar geleden

Pages are not as it seems several pages have one or two words on them and make it hard to decider what is written

Volgen

GradeProfessor Lid sinds 4 jaar 1073 documenten verkocht

100

$10.29

In winkelwagen

Opslaan

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

PHI-103
PHI-103
Week 5 Quiz Ashford University
Grade Details - All Questions
Question 1. Question :
Since all philosophers are seekers of truth, it follows that no evil
human is a seeker after truth, since no philosophers are evil humans.
The statement, “no evil human is a seeker after truth,” is the conclusion.
Student Answer: InstructorTrue False
The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting
Explanation:Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 2. Question :
When disagreeing with a premise, .
Student Answer: one should point to the outcomes of the conclusion
one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.
one should attack premises that are not important to the
argument
one should point out the failings of its author
Instructor Explanation:The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by
Seeking Truth,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
[Type text] PHI-103
Question 3. Question :
I know that Stephen has a lot of money. His parents drive Mercedes. His dogs wear cashmere sweaters, and he paid cash for his Hummer.
The conclusion of the argument is .
Student Answer: His dogs wear cashmere sweaters.
I know that Stephen has a lot of money. He paid cash for his Hummer.
His parents drive Mercedes.
Instructor Explanation:The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 4. Question :
In argumentation, criticism is .
Student Answer: a negative thing that tears people down
an evaluation of elements outside of the argument
a way to make oneself look smarter than another
an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the argument
Instructor Explanation:The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by
Seeking Truth,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 5. Question :
Dogs are better than cats, since they always listen to what their masters say. They also are more fun and energetic.
The first sentence of this argument contains two premises.
Student Answer:True False
[Type text] PHI-103
InstructorThe answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting
[Type text] PHI-103
Explanation:Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received:1 of 1
Comments:
Question 6. Question :
Which of the following is an effective way to critique a deductive argument?
Student Answer: Use the same form and create an example that has true premises
and a false conclusion.
Use a different form and create a
counterexample. Demonstrate that the deductive
argument is weak. Critique the strength of an
inductive argument.
[Type text]

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.