‘If therapies from cognitive, biological and psychodynamic approaches work as treatments, why do we need positive psychology?’
9 views 0 purchase
Course
PY1 - Approaches in Psychology
Institution
WJEC
Book
The Complete Companions
‘If therapies from cognitive, biological and psychodynamic approaches work as treatments, why do we need positive psychology?’
An answer to this question, involving detailed analysis of the therapies.
I used this as part of my revision for my first year exams in which I attained 98%. I ac...
The ethics and efficacy of using conditioning on children
Essay: The Reliability of Eye Witness Testimony
The Positive Approach. Complete notes.
All for this textbook (8)
Written for
A/AS Level
WJEC
Psychology
PY1 - Approaches in Psychology
All documents for this subject (50)
Seller
Follow
Lrowland
Reviews received
Content preview
‘If therapies from cognitive, biological and psychodynamic approaches work as
treatments, why do we need positive psychology?’
Discuss the above quote [20]
Positive Psychology claims in a sense to be superior to the classic disciplines of
cognitive, biological and psychodynamic psychology in that it focuses on what
makes people happier as opposed to finding out why they are sad. It works from
0 rather than -10 so to speak. However, since the therapies from the afore
mentioned approaches have proven to be hugely effective and have brought
people’s happiness far above the minimum in many instances, the debate is
raised as to how much we actually need Positive Psychology. Is it a crucial,
transformative approach which serves to radically improve the lives of those who
are OK, or a money grabbing, elitist scheme to prey on people who’s lives just
aren’t quite good enough?
21st Century Western Society has been the breeding ground for the ideas of
Seligman, Csikszentmihalyi and the like to take off and find themselves in our
class rooms, work places and doctors offices, and it’s understandable why.
Students who have experienced positive psychology curriculum are half as likely
to show symptoms of depression as those who haven’t (Seligman et al. 2009)
and studies suggest that up to 70% of professionals who use positive techniques
to utilise their strengths feel more engaged and energised in their work. The
clear difference here between Positive Psychology and the old school therapies is
that it can be integrated into every part of life. It fills in the gaps left by people
who aren’t depressed or anxious, serving as a sort of preventative measure for
the very issues people look to therapy to solve.
However, to integrate Positive Psychology into schools and offices, money needs
to be spent and time needs to be made. In a report published by Financial Times
(2007) it was said that adding Positive Psychology to curriculums could lead to
society paying the price for children leaving school with less academic
achievements- because for one thing to be added another needs to be removed.
One could argue that school is not the place for learning how to be happy and
that parents should be instilling these skills in their children from birth using
common sense and that those who slip through the cracks can then be
introduced to talking or drug therapies. The Foresight Mental Capital and
Wellbeing Project (2008) evidenced the costs of unhappiness and stress in the
work place to be up to £26 billion a year for the British Economy, however it
would be naive to say Positive Psychology could solve this when it’s a) not viable
for everyone to find flow in a job and b) it could potentially be another source of
pressure on people to always do well- in this case doing well meaning being
happy.
In terms of inclusivity, Positive Psychology falls short of all of its negative
counterparts. In the UK anybody can refer themselves to Cognitive Behavioural
Therapy on the NHS and psychotherapeutic drugs are available too. Both
treatments work for people from a variety of cultural and socio economic
backgrounds, as they can be tailored and tweaked to the individual. Positive
Psychology on the other hand is hugely biased toward the white middle class,
not only because it is Euro-centric (Christopher and Hickenbottom, 2008) , but
because it assumes life is a level playing field; a common misconception of the
privileged. In Quality of Life Therapy, a person is asked to focus on the areas of
their life which are good rather than those which cause bother, but this would be
ineffective for people’s who’s ‘overall satisfaction’ is low, or when the area of
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Lrowland. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.68. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
