Summary
Samenvatting leerstof Aansprakelijkheidsrecht 2021/2022
- Course
- Institution
Dit document omvat een samenvatting van alle verplicht voorgeschreven literatuur en jurisprudentie.
[Show more]
1 review
By: kimmartens23 • 1 month ago
Seller
Follow
rurechtenstudent1996
Reviews received
Content preview
Literatuur & jurisprudentieInhoudsopgave
WEEK 1.......................................................................................................................................................... 5
LITERATUUR...........................................................................................................................................................5
K.J.O. Jansen, ‘Het subjectieve element van de onrechtmatigheid, Over de structuur van art. 6:162 BW’,
NTBR 2007, p. 222-228.....................................................................................................................................5
JURISPRUDENTIE......................................................................................................................................................6
HR 5 november 1965, NJ 1966/135 m.nt GJS (Kelderluik)................................................................................6
HR 22 april 1994, NJ 1994/624 (Taxus).............................................................................................................6
HR 9 december 1994, NJ 1996/403 (Zwiepende tak)........................................................................................6
HR 28 mei 2004, NJ 2005/105 (Jetblast I).........................................................................................................6
HR 12 november 2004, NJ 2005/138 (A. c.s./C. c.s.).........................................................................................6
WEEK 2.......................................................................................................................................................... 7
LITERATUUR...........................................................................................................................................................7
C.J.M. Klaassen, Monografieën Nieuw BW B-35, tweede druk 2017, nrs. 17-45.............................................7
C.J.M. Klaassen, ‘Kroniek Causaliteit in het aansprakelijkheidsrecht’, AV&S 2012/19..................................13
C.J.M. Klaassen, ‘Kansschade en proportionele aansprakelijkheid: volgens de Hoge Raad geen zijden van
dezelfde medaille’, AV&S 2013/4....................................................................................................................14
R.L.M. Cox, ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid versus kansverlies - Tussen dogmatiek en praktijk’, NTBR
2016/40...........................................................................................................................................................15
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................17
HR 8 februari 1985, NJ 1986/17 m.nt C.J.H. Brunner (Renteneurose)............................................................17
HR 9 oktober 1992, NJ 1994/535 (DES-dochters)...........................................................................................17
HR 24 oktober 1997, NJ 1998/257 (Baijings)..................................................................................................17
HR 9 april 2004, NJ 2004/308 (Fibromyalgie).................................................................................................17
HR 31 maart 2006, RvdW 2006/328 (Nefalit/erven Karamus).......................................................................18
HR 5 juni 2009, RvdW 2009/683 (Effectenlease)............................................................................................18
HR 5 juni 2009, RvdW 2009/684 (Levob/Bolle)...............................................................................................19
HR 24 december 2010, RvdW 2011/35 (Fortis/Bourgonje)............................................................................20
HR 23 november 2012, NJ 2012/669 (Gynaecoloog)......................................................................................20
HR 14 december 2012, JA 2013/67 m.nt R.L.M. Cox (NN/zoon en moeder)..................................................21
HR 21 december 2012, NJ 2013/237 (Deloitte Belastingadviseur/H&H Beheer)...........................................22
HR 23 december 2016, NJ 2017/133 (Netvliesloslating)................................................................................22
WEEK 3........................................................................................................................................................ 23
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................23
A.L.M. Keirse & R.H.C. Jongeneel, Eigen schuld en medeaansprakelijkheid (Monografieën Privaatrecht nr.
16) 2013..........................................................................................................................................................23
nrs. 1 t/m 62 (§ 1 t/m 22)...............................................................................................................................23
nrs. 147 t/m 174 (§ 50 en 51).........................................................................................................................27
nrs. 202 t/m 207 (§ 55)...................................................................................................................................28
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................29
HR 1 juni 1990, ECLI:NL:HR:1990:AB7631, NJ 1991/720, m.nt. C.J.H. Brunner (Ingrid Kolkman)..................29
HR 28 februari 1992, ECLI:NL:HR:1992:ZC0526, NJ 1993/566, m.nt. C.J.H. Brunner (IZA/Vrerink)................29
HR 24 december 1993, ECLI:NL:HR:1993:ZC1196, NJ 1995/236, m.nt. C.J.H. Brunner (Anja Kellenaers)......29
HR 2 juni 1995, ECLI:NL:HR:1995:ZC1740, NJ 1997/700 (Klaverblad/IZA).....................................................29
HR 27 april 2001, ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AB1335, NJ 2002/54, m.nt. C.J.H. Brunner (Donkers/Scholten).............30
HR 2 december 2005, ECLI:NL:HR:2005:AU5661, NJ 2006/444, m.nt. J.B.M. Vranken (Rijpma/Groot)........30
HR 30 maart 2007, ECLI:NL:HR:2007:AZ7863, NJ 2008/64, m.nt. T. Hartlief (Pesti/Noordhollandsche).......30
HR 5 juni 2009, ECLI:NL:HR:2009:BH2815, NJ 2012/182, m.nt. J.B.M. Vranken (Dexia/Den Treek)..............31
, HR 14 december 2012, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BX8349, NJ 2013/236 (NN/Moeder & zoon).................................31
HR 10 juli 2015, ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1873, NJ 2016/26, m.nt. M.M. Mendel (Achmea/Menzis).......................31
HR 16 oktober 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1628, NJ 2020/392 (AHP Manufacturing)........................................32
HR 17 november 1967, ECLI:NL:HR:1967:AC4789, NJ 1968/42, m.nt. G.J. Scholten (Pos/Van den Bosch)....32
HR 18 december 2009, ECLI:NL:HR:2009:BK0873, NJ 2012/614 (London/Delta Lloyd).................................32
HR 7 december 2001, ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AB2795, NJ 2002/576, m.nt. J.B.M. van Vranken (Gemeente
Leeuwarden/Los).............................................................................................................................................32
WEEK 4........................................................................................................................................................ 34
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................34
C.J.M. Klaassen, Monografieën Nieuw BW-35, tweede druk 2017, nrs. 2-16, 80-83.....................................34
I. Haazen, ‘Schade in een niet-rechtmatig belang', WPNR 6816, p. 827-836, § 1 en 2..................................37
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................38
HR 15 mei 1998, NJ 1998/624 (Vehof/Helvetia Schadeverzekering)..............................................................38
HR 28 mei 1999, AA 1999/9 (Johanna Kruidhof)............................................................................................38
HR 14 januari 2000, NJ 2000/437 (Van Sas/Interpolis)..................................................................................38
HR 11 juli 2008, NJ 2009/385 (Bakkum/Achmea)...........................................................................................38
HR 5 december 2008, VR 2009/27 (Rijnstate)................................................................................................39
HR 10 april 2009, NJ 2009/386 (PhilipMorris/Bolink).....................................................................................39
Rb. Den Haag 23 juli 2013, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2013:9276 (X/Reaal Schadeverzekeringen NV).........................39
HR 8 juli 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1483 (TenneT/ABB).....................................................................................39
WEEK 5........................................................................................................................................................ 41
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................41
I. Haazen, ‘Schade in een niet-rechtmatig belang’, WPNR 6816, p. 827-836, m.n. § relativiteit en de
daaropvolgende..............................................................................................................................................41
I. Haazen, 'Relativiteit en causaliteit naar aanleiding van het schietincident Alphen aan den Rijn. Noot bij
HR 20 september 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:1409', TVP 2019/4, p. 143-149.....................................................41
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................42
HR 17 januari 1958, NJ 1961/568 (Tandartsen).............................................................................................42
HR 27 januari 1984, NJ 1984/536 m.nt W.C.L. van der Grinten (Verstekeling)..............................................42
HR 31 maart 1995, NJ 1997/592 (Taams/Boudeling).....................................................................................42
HR 22 februari 2002, NJ 2002/240, m.nt. J.B.M. Vranken (Kindertaxi)..........................................................42
HR 7 mei 2004, NJ 2006/281 m.nt Jac. Hijma (Duwbak Linda)......................................................................43
HR 13 oktober 2006, NJ 2008/527 (DNB/Vie d’Or).........................................................................................43
HR 10 november 2006, RvdW 2006, 1058 (Astrazeneca/Menzis)..................................................................43
HR 23 februari 2007, NJ 2008/492 m.nt J.B.M. Vranken (De Groot/Io Vivat)................................................44
HR 13 april 2007, NJ 2008/576 (Iraanse vluchtelinge)...................................................................................44
HR 8 oktober 2010, NJ 2011, 465 m.nt. Hartlief (Hangmat)..........................................................................44
HR 29 januari 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:162 (‘X/Y en Delta Lloyd’ of ‘Manegepaard Imagine’).......................44
HR 20 september 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:1409 (Schietincident Alphen a/d Rijn)..........................................45
WEEK 6........................................................................................................................................................ 46
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................46
C.J.M. Klaassen, ‘Risico- aansprakelijkheid, bijna een kwart eeuw later. Terugblik op het proefschrift
"Risicoaansprakelijkheid. De afdelingen 6.3.2 en 6.3.3 NBW, alsmede art. 31 Wegenverkeerswet",
Verkeersrecht 2015/142.................................................................................................................................46
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................47
HR 24 februari 1984, NJ 1984/415 (Bardoel/Swinkels)..................................................................................47
HR 21 december 2001, NJ 2002/75 (Delfland/Stoeterij de Kraal)..................................................................47
HR 9 november 2007, NJ 2007/597 (Groot Kievitsdal)...................................................................................47
HR 25 april 2008, NJ 2008/262 (Boekema/ouders)........................................................................................48
HR 18 juni 2010, NJ 2010/389 (X./Sijm Agro).................................................................................................48
HR 8 oktober 2010, RvdW 2010/1164 (Hangmat)..........................................................................................48
HR 26 oktober 2010, ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BM9757 (DB/Edco)...........................................................................48
HR 17 december 2010, NJ 2012/155 (Wilnis).................................................................................................49
HR 1 april 2011, NJ 2011/405 (Loretta)..........................................................................................................49
, HR 7 oktober 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2283 (Nijmeegse marktkraam)...........................................................49
WEEK 7........................................................................................................................................................ 51
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................51
C.J.M. Klaassen, ‘De reikwijdte van de werkgeversaansprakelijkheid voor arbeidsongevallen na
TNT/Wijenberg en De Rooyse Wissel/Hagens en hoe nu verder?, NTBR 2012, p. 397-411...........................51
C.J.M. Klaassen, ‘Enkele opmerkingen over bewijs bij arbeidsongevallen en beroepsziekte’,
Arbeidsprocesrecht in beweging, 2012, pag. 69-83.......................................................................................52
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................53
HR 20 september 1996, NJ 1997, 198 (Pollemans/Hoondert)........................................................................53
HR 22 januari 1999, NJ 1999, 534 (Stichting Reclassering/S) alleen de samenvatting..................................53
HR 19 oktober 2001, NJ 2001, 663 (PTT Post/Baas) alleen de samenvatting................................................53
HR 17 november 2000, NJ 2001, 596 (Unilever/Dikmans)..............................................................................54
HR 4 oktober 2002, NJ 2004, 175 (Broodmes)................................................................................................54
HR 16 mei 2003, NJ 2004, 176 (Dusarduyn/Du Puy).......................................................................................54
HR 5 november 2004, NJ 2005, 215 (Stichting De Loserhof)..........................................................................54
HR 11 maart 2005, RvdW 2005, 37 (ABN AMRO/Nieuwenhuys)...................................................................55
HR 11 november 2005, NJ 2008, 460 (Bayar/Wijnen)....................................................................................55
HR 23 juni 2006, NJ 2006, 354 (Havermans/Luyckx)......................................................................................55
HR 2 maart 2007, NJ 2007, 143 (Perez/Casa Grande)....................................................................................55
HR 17 april 2009, LJN BH 1996 (M/V Communicatie/X).................................................................................56
HR 26 november 2010, NJ 2010, 635 (Kevin Jones/Fugro).............................................................................56
HR 11 november 2011, NJ 2011, 597 (Vallende postbode)............................................................................56
HR 11 november 2011, NJ 2011, 598 (Rooyse wissel)....................................................................................57
HR 7 juni 2013, NJ 2014, 99 (Lansink/Ritsma)................................................................................................57
HR 7 juni 2013, NJ 2014, 98 (RSI)....................................................................................................................58
WEEK 8........................................................................................................................................................ 59
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................59
Friesch Dagblad, 14 december 2011, Smartengeld is niet bedoeld als straf..................................................59
NJ-noot S.D. Lindenbergh bij HR 27 september 2016, ECLI:HR:2016:2201, NJ 2017, 88................................59
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................60
HR 9 oktober 1998, NJ 1998, 853 (Van Aalten/VCWO, Jeffrey)......................................................................60
HR 26 oktober 2001, NJ 2002, 216 (Oogmerk)...............................................................................................60
HR 20 september 2002, NJ 2004, 112 (Comapatiënt).....................................................................................60
HR 22 februari 2002, NJ 2002, 240 (Kindertaxi).............................................................................................60
HR 18 maart 2005, NJ 2006, 606 (Kelly).........................................................................................................61
HR 9 oktober 2009, NJ 2010/387 (Kleijnen c.s./ReaalSchadeverzekeringen).................................................62
HR 15 maart 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:376, NJ 2019, 162 m. nt. S.D. Lindenbergh..........................................62
WEEK 9........................................................................................................................................................ 64
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................64
J. Meyst-Michels en M.S.E. van Beurden, 'Kroniek medische aansprakelijkheid', AV&S 2015, m.n. nr. 3, 4, 5
en 6 (norm; informed consent; hulpzaken; bewijs).........................................................................................64
M.S.E. van Beurden, ‘De (on)redelijkheid van het toerekenen van de gebrekkigheid van een medische
hulpzaak aan de arts of het ziekenhuis ex art. 6:77 BW’, PIV- Bulletin mei 2015, p. 6-11.............................64
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................65
HR 20 november 1987, NJ 1988, 500 (Timmer/Deutman)..............................................................................65
HR 1 december 2000, VR 2001, 92 (Mislukte sterilisatie)...............................................................................65
HR 2 maart 2001, NJ 2001, 649 (Trombose, MC Leeuwarden/In 't Hout)......................................................65
HR 23 november 2001, NJ 2002, 386 (Oostelijk Zuid-Limburg/Stichting Gezondheidszorg)..........................65
HR 2 juli 2002, NJ 2003, 151 (A c.s./E.)...........................................................................................................65
HR 18 maart 2005, NJ 2006, 606 (Kelly).........................................................................................................65
HR 1 april 2005, NJ 2006, 377 (X. e.a/ZOA Verzekeringen)............................................................................66
HR 20 april 2007, RvdW 2007, 423 (Filshieclip)..............................................................................................67
Rb. ‘s Gravenhage 31 december 2008, JA 2009, 31 m.nt. Giard....................................................................67
HR 23 april 2010, RvdW 2010, 573 (informed consent)..................................................................................67
, HR 23 november 2012, LJN BX7264 (omkeringsregel)....................................................................................68
Hof ’s-Hertogenbosch, 27 november 2014, ECLI:GHSHE:2014:493................................................................68
HR 19 juni 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1090 (PIP-implantaten): prejudiciële vragen...........................................68
HR 19 juni 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1082 (Miragelplombe).............................................................................69
WEEK 10...................................................................................................................................................... 70
HR 20 DECEMBER 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2006 NJ 2020/41 M.NT. J. SPIER (URGENDA). NB: ALLEEN R.O. 4.1 T/M R.O.
8.4 VAN DE HOGE RAAD........................................................................................................................................70
RB. DEN HAAG 26 MEI 2021, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5337 (K LIMAATZAAK MILIEUDEFENSIE/SHELL). NB ALLEEN R.O. 4.4.1
T/M 4.6.4...........................................................................................................................................................71
T.R. BLEEKER, ‘HR URGENDA: KLIMAATVERANDERING EN HET KLIMAATBEVEL NADER BEKEKEN’, NTBR 2020/6....................71
J.J. VAN DER HELM, HET RECHTERLIJK BEVEL EN VERBOD (BURGERLIJK PROCES & PRAKTIJK NR. 19), DEVENTER: WOLTERS
KLUWER 2019, PARAGRAAF 1.1 (NUMMERS 1 EN 2)..................................................................................................72
WEEK 11...................................................................................................................................................... 74
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................74
C.J.M. Klaassen, 'De Wet afwikkeling massaschade in collectieve actie: eindelijk werkelijkheid, nu nog gaan
werken…', TCR 2019, afl. 4, p. 145-152...........................................................................................................74
W.H. van Boom, 'WCA → WCAM → WAMCA', TvCH 2019, afl. 4, p. 154-160...............................................74
C.M.D.S. Pavillon, 'Leent het materiële privaatrecht zich voor de afwikkeling van massaschade?',
Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis 2019, afl. 4, p. 163-176...............................................................................75
C.J.M. Klaassen, 'De rol van de (gewijzigde) WCAM bij de collectieve afwikkeling van massaschade ‘en nog
wat van die dingen’, AA 20130627, p. 627-639..............................................................................................75
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................76
Hof Amsterdam 16 juni 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:2257, JOR 2018/10, m.nt. J.S. Kortmann & Hof
Amsterdam 5 februari 2018, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2018:368................................................................................76
Hof Amsterdam 13 juli 2018, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2018:2422, JOR 2018/246, m.nt. I.N. Tzankova...................76
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rurechtenstudent1996. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.43. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now