Class notes
Answering problem style question on separation of powers
- Course
- Institution
Answering problem style question on separation of powers
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Unicorn02
Content preview
Sop problem question structureIntro
Sop is unique, equal, separate and political doctrine
Montesquieu believed the SoP was to preserve liberty and prevent the abuse of
state power by distributing it amongst the different branches of government.
Uk unwritten constitution- soft v Us written constitution- rigid
Historically all power was in the hands of the Monarch which allowed them to abuse
their power. But now it’s now largely symbolic so doesn’t impact on the overall
division of power within the state.
Now power has been divided between a number of key ‘organs of state’. They
oversee each other and have to work together to achieve their objectives. This
serves to stop abuse of power by any member of the state.
Main body
◐ E and L
- Bagehot (1876)- ‘nearly complete fusion’ of the legislature and executive. So
there’s least SOP as there is large overlap.
-Our electoral system is the main reason why the executive dominate the legislature.
Causes an imbalance between powers because it creates an ‘in-built’ majority for the
party which wins and forms the government in Parliament.
-Delegated legislation- the executive can pass whatever legislation they want
without going through Parliament (BREXIT!!!- R v Miller). E thinks they don’t need to
obey the law because they are dominant but they forget RoL applies to them too
(nobody is above the law)
-The E had an old power to dissolve Parliament (now gone Fixed-Term Parliaments
Act (2011))
-Votes of no confidence- As a parliamentary motion, it demonstrates to the head of
state that the elected parliament no longer has confidence in the appointed
government. If a no confidence motion is passed against an individual minister they
have to give their resignation along with the entire council of ministers (1979 Labour
Government)
-Limiting the number of ministers in HoC to 95 (s.2 House of Commons
Disqualification Act (1975))
-Fire Brigades Union (1995)- This case prevented the executive acting contrary to
the legislature. The Home Secretary acted unlawfully and ignored the act altogether.
-Congreve v Home Office (1976) (the powers of the executive)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Unicorn02. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.33. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now