100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
Eerder door jou gezocht
Summary final.docx CRJ310 People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al. CRJ310 The University of Arizona Global Campus People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al. Case: Thesis A judicial opinion can agree to by more than half of the members of$7.49
In winkelwagen
Summary final.docx CRJ310 People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al. CRJ310 The University of Arizona Global Campus People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al. Case: Thesis A judicial opinion can agree to by more than half of the members of
2 keer bekeken 0 keer verkocht
Vak
UAGC
Instelling
Ashford University
CRJ310 People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al. CRJ310 The University of Arizona Global Campus People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al. Case: 44416 Thesis A judicial opinion can agree to by more than half of the members of a court. As this essay is based by those opinions. The majorit...
et al crj310 the university of arizona global campus people v dripster
dummy amp stupido et al case 1903456 44416 thesis a judici
Geschreven voor
Ashford University
UAGC
Alle documenten voor dit vak (718)
Verkoper
Volgen
helperatsof1
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
CRJ310
People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et al.
CRJ310
The University of Arizona Global Campus
People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido, et
al. Case: 1903456
8/8/2021
Thesis
A judicial opinion can agree to by more than half of the members of a court. As this
essay is based by those opinions. The majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and
an explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision. The question is whether the fourth,
fifth and eighth amendment right under the defendant’s resolve per violation. After carefully
evaluating the evidence and judicial documentations and following through with issued
warrants. Hear, by place and power of the following information based on Judicial Supreme
Courts agreement as the opinion.
Body
Dripsters fourth Amendment right was under violation, when officers placed the
tracking device upon the vehicle owned by the girlfriend, it was the attempt to follow a
known criminal, under the Fourth Amendment the right to protect individuals from
government overreach starts by not allowing unreasonable search and seizure of current
citizen of the United States.
, However, law enforcement did not have permission from the car owner and
therefore violated freedom of one, Dripster. However, under certain procedures of the
RICO act, law enforcement officials can use this means of collecting data to hold a
criminal organization for investigation to bring all evidence under one roof. As for the
definition of RICO, “The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. It allows
prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing
criminal enterprise” (RICO, 2011). A RICO order approved by the Attorney General or
placed judge that is part of the investigation. to implement the case study. In this case no
evidence of written memorandum or warrant placing the criminal gang under the RICO
Act.
Evidence obtained from the residence
Evaluating whether all evidence from the house has discovery because evidence
considered fruit of the poisonous started from the tracking device. Citing extremely, that all
evidence in this case to removed is half tailed. Evidence collected after the tracking device
only includes the direction that the client’s headings. The collection of the whereabouts of
the defendants was the focus in this investigation. All evidence up to this point should not be
consider under the exclusionary rule since no evidence collection came from up to this point.
The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 created that all cannabis and those
that have passion will receive penalties upon possession and forfeit of civil liberties.
Bloodhound tactics that were implemented by law enforcement to find and locate cannabis
and true to the search bloodhound found the smell of illegal cannabis at the residence that was
under investigation. Under the conditions that the bloodhound smell test used without a
warrant is with merit. Bloodhound devices that are used in cases are not used to remove
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper helperatsof1. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $7.49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
