Main characteristics of licences
Personal rather than proprietary - a personal permission to go onto and/or use land which
would otherwise amount to a trespass
No formal requirements for grant of a licence
Licensor = person who grants the licence
Licensee = person who has the benefit of the licence
Types of licences
Bare licences
Simply gives permission to licensee to enter and remain on land for as long as licensor
permits
No consideration is paid so it is gratuitous
The licensor can revoke (terminate) the licence whenever they want, with immediate effect,
subject to giving the licensee a reasonable time to leave the land (‘packing up’ period) -
Winter Garden Theatre Ltd v Millennium Productions Ltd [1948] AC 173
Licences coupled with an interest
Landowner grants a right to someone to take something from their land (eg, wood, fish) (a
profit a pendre) with an accompanying, incidental licence to come onto the land for that
purpose
The licence lasts as long as the right; it can be revoked once the interest ends.
Contractual licences
Licence granted pursuant to a contractual agreement, ie, to enter onto/use land in return for
consideration
Can be express or implied
Tanner v Tanner [1975] 1 WLR 1346 – contractual licence inferred where woman gave up
protected tenancy to move into partner’s home and care for their children. Lord Denning MR said
that the court could infer a contract that she should remain in the property as long as the children
were of school age and required accommodation.
Licence cannot be revoked during the contractual period
Verral v. Great Yarmouth BC [1981] QB 202 – contract by Council to allow use of hall by
National Front for a 2-day conference. Labour Party subsequently had Council majority and
sought to revoke NF’s licence. Court upheld the contractual licence which could not be revoked
and was specifically enforceable.
Can contractual licences bind third parties?
How has the law developed the concept of contractual licences?
King v. David Allen [1916] 2 AC 54 – orthodox view: contract between King and DA purely
personal and could not bind a third party purchaser so King (licensor) was liable in damages;
contractual licences do not amount to proprietary rights.
Errington v. Errington & Woods [1952] I KB 290: family context - a contractual licence
‘supported by an equity’ (Lord Denning) which could bind a transferee
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller marwa11111. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.