Summary
Summary case summaries second semester Succession
- Course
- Institution
concise case summaries on the core principles and ratio's of these listed 10 prescribed cases for second semester 2021.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
TJDlamini
Reviews received
Content preview
Casey NO v The Master:• When the husband was disqualified from inheriting, he approached the
HC to relax the maxim.
• His counsel argued:
• The principle was obsolete in the case of negligent killing.
• The court did not agree, and the disqualification remained.
• The court held:
• The maxim still applied in the circumstances.
• The husband, who had been convicted of culpable homicide in that
he had killed his wife in a shooting accident, was not entitled to
benefit under her will and that she had accordingly died intestate.
• The court held further:
• If the application of the maxim caused hardship it was for the
Legislature to intervene and relax the effect of the principle.
• In this case, disqualified from inheriting but could take his share of joint
estate.
, Leeb v Leeb:
• When one spouse murders the other, court has the power to order a
forfeiture of the benefits of marriage in community of property.
• Wife was convicted of the murder of her husband. Married ICOP.
• Application for an order declaring that the wife had, by reason of her
having murdered the deceased, forfeited any financial or patrimonial
benefit to which she would have been entitled as a result of the
deceased’s death and that she had forfeited the benefits of the
marriage in community of property.
• Court held:
Under the common law the innocent spouse is, when obtaining a divorce:
- Entitled to an order of forfeiture by the guilty spouse of the
benefits of the marriage in community of property.
Where one of the two spouses to a marriage in community of property,
murders the other, the court has the power to order that the spouse
who committed the murder, forfeits, by reason of the murder, the
benefits of the marriage in community of property.
However, in this matter there was no proof before the Court that the
wife had in fact murdered the deceased. The mere conviction of the
wife was not sufficient evidence that she had in fact murdered the
deceased.
• The Court accordingly ordered that the matter be referred for oral
evidence.
• Whether the wife did in fact murder the deceased and
further what the respective contributions of the wife and
the deceased were to the community estate.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TJDlamini. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now