100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Unit 3 criminology- AC 2.3 Understand rules in relation to the use of evidence in criminal cases $4.09   Add to cart

Essay

Unit 3 criminology- AC 2.3 Understand rules in relation to the use of evidence in criminal cases

5 reviews
 2599 views  8 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

This is a perfect answer to AC 2.3, for year 12/13 Criminology students. This AC is a short 4 marker, this answer will ensure you pick up all of these marks.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • January 17, 2022
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+

5  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: garethjones020 • 1 year ago

matches up to my course and follows the same criteria

review-writer-avatar

By: onyii • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: priyakullar109 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: emiliahenders • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: joshuaasher2005 • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
2.3 Understand rules in relation to the use of evidence in criminal cases

Relevance of evidence
The evidence used on the defendants and prosecution side has to be reliable. This means:
Credible, where the court needs to believe the piece of evidence shown to them, authentic,
this is where the evidence needs to be true and not forged , accurate, where the evidence is
supported by fact. In the case of Bill Roache, he was accused of groping underage women
on the set of Coronation street. However, these offences took place over 40 years ago
therefore some of the women giving evidence couldn't quite remember specific details. This
meant the evidence was not reliable and Bill was later acquitted. There are two different
types of fact in a trial: Facts in issue and relevant facts. Facts in issue are facts that the
prosecution try to prove and defence try to disprove, for example someone is accused of
murder, the prosecution needs to prove that the this person committed the act and defence
has to try to disprove it. Relevant facts is the evidence needed to prove the facts in issue,
for example the prosecution found fingerprints on the murder weapon that matches the
suspect.

Admissibility of evidence
If evidence is illegally or improperly obtained it is not admissible in court. Illegally obtained
evidence is where evidence is gained through breaking the law or violating a person's
human rights, for example illegally tape recording a conversation. Improperly obtained
evidence is where deception is used to gain evidence, for example using undercover
officers. It is everyone's right to remain silent as the accused are innocent until proven guilty.
However, the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 allows members of the jury to draw
inferences about a defendant's guilt when remaining silent. Failing to answer police
questions can infer a defendant's guilt. Failure to testify in court can be inferred guilt unless
the defence provides a reason otherwise. When accepting evidence for a defendant it has to
be credible. If the evidence is provided by a good character it can mean the evidence can be
classified as credible. The Criminal Justice Act 2003 defines bad character as evidence of or
disposition towards misconduct, this can include previous conviction.

Disclosure of evidence
The law puts a duty on the prosecution to disclose evidence to the defendant so they are
able to inspect the materials and defence so that they can prepare to answer the case
against them. The prosecution has a duty to: Provide the names of any witnesses beyond
those named on the indictment that the prosecution intends to call to give evidence and
make accessible to the defence any unused material relevant to the case that they do not
plan to present to the court. Unused material includes anything that might undermine the
prosecution's own case or help the defense's case, for example search records, the
disclosure of this needs to be done as soon as it is reasonably practicable. If the prosecution
fails to disclose the case can be completely dropped. For example in the case of liam Allen,
who was accused of rape but the trial was dropped when it emerged the prosecution had not
disclosed the computer disc which ended up showing a substantial amount of text messages
from the victim pestering him for casual sex.

Hearsay evidence
Hearsay evidence is where a statement has been made by someone out of court to a
witness who is appearing in court. For example Greg is a witness in a murder trial. He

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller atkinsont137. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.09. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.09  8x  sold
  • (5)
  Add to cart