100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Assignment 5 - ANCOVA $7.50   Add to cart

Presentation

Assignment 5 - ANCOVA

 47 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Assignment 5 answers and output interpretation explained

Preview 4 out of 15  pages

  • January 21, 2022
  • 15
  • 2021/2022
  • Presentation
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Assignment 5: ANCOVA & Factorial Designs
(Output Interpretation Explained)


The Effects of Goal Orientation on Job Search
and Reemployment


Question 1
The researchers were interested in the effect of different workshops (Group) on job search
behavior – measured before the workshop (T0activities) as a covariate in the statistical
analysis

Why did the researchers use job sear behavior at T0 as a covariate in the statistical analysis?

1) To reduce the error variance within the group => the covariate variable accounts for
some the unexplained variance
2) To correct the effect in the model for the influence of the covariate

If assumptions are not violated => likely that adding a covariate is truly controlling for its
effect on the dependent variable (i.e., eliminates confounds)

The main research questions are:

(1) “Are unemployed job seekers who were trained in setting learning goals for their job
– more likely than others to put continued effort into job seeking, resulting in more
job search behavior?”
(2) “Is there a relationship between the type of training and finding a job – 8 weeks after
the training?”

First – differences between the different workshop were examined – with respect to job
search behavior when controlling for job search behavior at T0

Second –the proportion of people from the different workshops that had a particular
employment status at T3 was examined

,Question 2
Describe the dependent and independent variables for the above research questions:

Independent Variables

 Type of training => control, learning goal, and performance goal workshops
- Between-subject factor => different participants randomly assigned to different
categories of the IV; a participant is assigned to and experiences only one of the
three experimental conditions
- Nominal/Categorical variable => the variable has three categories, without any
intrinsic ordering of the categories
 Job Search Behavior at T0 (covariate) => examined before training begins
- Between-subject factor => participants are measured on job search behavior
prior to training (only once) and the results are compared between participants of
different groups
- Measured using 8-item index of job search activities => participants had to
indicate how much time they had spent on such activities (response options: 1=no
time at all to 5=very much time)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced
 Age (covariate)
- Between-subject factor => each participant’s age was measured only once and the
ages were compared between participant
- Measured on an interval/continuous scale => we know if one participant is
older/younger than another; we can tell by how much one is older/younger than
the other
 Trait Learning Goal Orientation (covariate)
- Between-subjects variable
- Measured with a two-dimensional measure (response options: 1 = strongly
disagree to 5 = strongly agree)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced
 Trait Performance Goal Orientation (covariate)
- Between-subjects variable

, - Measured with a two-dimensional measure (response options: 1 = strongly
disagree to 5 = strongly agree)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced

Dependent Variables

 Job Search Behavior at T2 => examined 2 weeks following training via phone
interview
- Between-subject factor => participants are measured on job search behavior two
weeks after training (only once) and the results are compared between participants
of different groups
- Measured using 8-item index of job search activities => participants had to
indicate how much time they had spent on such activities (response options: 1=no
time at all to 5=very much time)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced
 Employment Status (T3job) => measured 8 weeks after training via phone interview
- Between-subject factor => participants are measured on employment status eight
weeks after training (only once) and the results are compared between participants
of different groups
- Participants were asked whether they found a job (1 = yes, 0 = no)
- Measured on a nominal scale => there is no order and there is no distance between
yes and no

ANCOVA Test and Cross-Table

These analyses will be shown and the output interpretation will be explained following the
data screening and outlier detection.

1) ANCOVA => testing the effectiveness of the workshops with respect to job search
behavior when controlling for job search behavior at T0
2) Cross-Table – including type of training and employment status

, Question 3




The minimum statistic for T2activities => should be 1 at the lowest, since response options
range from 1 to 5

Kurtosis (the degree of presence of outliers in the distribution) => should be 3 for normal
distribution

- Low kurtosis < 3 => light tails; lack of outliers; most data points are present in
high proximity with the mean; flat distribution
- High kurtosis > 3 => heavy tails; presence of outliers; peaked distribution
 If positive => heavy-tailed; if negative => light tailed

Skewness (measure of (lack of) symmetry) => should be 0 for normal distribution

- Positive value => too many low scores; right-skewed
- Negative value => too many high scores; left-skewed

Remember:

 Standardized residuals > 3 are cause for concern
 Standardized residuals > 2.5 for more than 1% of the data are cause for concern




Case numbers 46 and 60 have a std. residuals > 2.5 and this is 2.2% of the data => cause for
concern – and Case number 47 has a std. residual > 3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller galinajimberry. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.50  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart