100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IBP Social and Organizational Psychology Summary with Keywords $8.57   Add to cart

Summary

IBP Social and Organizational Psychology Summary with Keywords

 27 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

IBP Social and Organizational Psychology Summary including both lecture and textbook notes with keywords highlighted in bold

Preview 3 out of 20  pages

  • January 27, 2022
  • 20
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Organizational Psychology


Lecture 1- The Self and Groups
Ch 4+11
The Self
How well do you know yourself?
 Intentions vs behaviour self-other discrepancy, who is more likely to accurately estimate how
much someone engages in a behaviour, yourself or someone else
- Others are just as good as estimating your behavior as you are because of our intentions
bias the estimations of our real behaviors
How to know yourself?
 Self-promotion presenting our most favorable aspects
 Self-verification presenting ourselves in ways that induce others to agree with our own self-
views
 Ingratiation creates favorable self-presentation by conveying respect for others
 Self-depreciate to communicate admiration for another through comparison
 Introspection conscious access
 Affective forecasting biases over-projection of current feelings and failure to consider context
 Social comparison judging ourselves in comparison to others- used when difficult to estimate
how well we are performing
- With whom we compare ourselves depends on our goals
- Downward comparison compare with someone who isn’t as good, to feel better about
ourselves
- Upward comparison compare with someone who is better than ourselves for the
motivation to grow
- Above average effect we see ourselves more positively and less negatively than we see
others
 Personal versus social identity continuum:
- personal identity level we can think of ourselves in terms of attributes that differentiate
ourselves from other individuals, and therefore will be based on intragroup comparison.
- social identity level perceptions of ourselves are based on attributes that are shared with
other group members- intergroup comparison
 Possible selves other future possible selves that can motivate us to attempt self-change
 Autobiographical memory allows us to feel good about our current self by comparing it to
past selves
 Ego depletion when self control is used up and therefore makes it more difficult to self-
regulate
How do you define yourself?
 APhysical self-descriptions physical qualities that do not imply social interaction (age, sex,
weight, etc.)
 BSocial self-descriptions relationships, group memberships, social roles, attitudes which are
socially defined and validated (nationality, job, etc.)
 CPsychological self-descriptions psychological traits and states and attitudes which do not
refer to particular social reference. (I happy, I am shy)

,Organizational Psychology


 D Holistic self-descriptions characteristics so comprehensive pr vague that they do not
distinguish one person from another (I am me, I am a human being)
 Cultural differences in how ppl define themselves
- Interdependent self-view(B) define oneself in terms of one’s relationships to other people
and recognize that the self is often determined by others- Nonwestern self-view, focus on
connectedness with others, interdependence
- Independent self-view (A and C) define oneself in terms of own internal thoughts, feelings,
and actions- western self-view, separate from others, unique, independent
 Age differences
- Young (C) describe themselves with personality traits3
- Older (B) use more social roles
 Gender differences
- Relational interdependence (B) focus more on close relationships (Women)
- Collective interdependence (B) focus more on memberships in large groups (men)
 Social Identity theory our identity is for a large part determined by the context
- Social identity exists with all the groups that you are part of and that are important to you
- Salient identity identity present in that moment within that context
- Identity changes within the context meaning one true self doesn’t exist
 Comparison social identity not only depends on context but who we compare ourselves with
 Centrality some aspects of ourselves are more central to our definition of our identity (e.g.
sexual orientation, religion, etc.)
Feeling good about yourself:
 Being part of a group can make us feel good about ourselves
 If our social identity is disapproved by others we can either try to change or we can turn the
disproved aspects into something +ve for ourselves (improve self-esteem)
 Self-esteem do something good compared to others either on your own or in a group
- In a group when others achieve something it can improve your own self-esteem even if not
personally responsible for the achievement
- Basking in reflected glory feeling good about yourself as part of a winning team, more
likely to be proud of your identity after your group wins, more likely to represent your group
- Cutting off reflected failure less likely to represent your group after failure/losing,
tendency to connect ourselves to a successful group and distance from a group we are not
proud of
Stereotype threat:
 Not always able to distance ourselves from certain groups
 Some groups have stereotypes- these stereotypes can become self-fulfilling prophecies
(stereotype threats)
 Stereotype threatproduces fear negative impact on
performance
 Vicious cycle created by stereotype threat

- A positive role model can help break the vicious cycle

, Organizational Psychology


 The Obama effect black people stereotyped by lower intelligence, tested before and after
Obama elected, before black scored significantly lower than white however after no significance
was found
Groups
Joining groups:
 Group 2 or more people that strive for a mutual goal or strive to meet a mutual need together
- Collections of people who perceive themselves as forming a cohesive unit to some degree.
 Evolutionary explanation for joining groups ppl who joined groups were evolutionarily more
successful
 Common-bond groups members are bonded with each other
 Common identity groups members linked via category as a whole
 Entitativity the extent to which the group is perceived to form a coherent entity
 Reasons to work in a group:
- Task goals sharing knowledge and information
- Social goals fulfills our needs to belong
 Joining groups some groups allow anyone to join other require certain characteristics or
behaviors or rituals to be performed to join
- Initiation rites
- Cognitive dissonance experienced when behavior is not inline with attitude
Key components of groups:
 Statuseither between or within groups
 Hierarchy status within a group can be determined by physical characteristics, behaviour, and
seniority
 Roles formal and informal roles within a group can determine status
 Norms the more you identify with a group the more you conform with group norms
- Group norms implicit rules about what is appropriate- can affect our emotional expressions
and experiences through adherence to feeling rules
- Norms of individualism and collectivism can affect our willingness to tolerate dissent within
groups
 Cohesiveness the forces that cause members to remain in that group
- High cohesiveness can increase likelihood of staying in the group, taking part in group
activities and recruiting new members
 Schism  when a group splinters into distinct factions based on ideology
- Can cause emotional distress in those who feel compelled to leave
 Intergroup sensitivity effect intergroup critics are more tolerated than outgroup critics as they
are seen as having the ingroup’s interests at heart
 Social facilitation the presence of others is arousing and can either increase or decrease
performance
 Distraction conflict theory the presence of others induces conflicting tendencies to focus on
the task being performed and, on an audience,
 Evaluation apprehension view an audience disrupts our performance because we are
concerned about their evaluation of us
Cooperation and Conflict:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mariannedahler11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$8.57  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart