Essay

Essay 1 (problems of evil) PHLA10 - Reason and Truth

0 purchase

Course
PHLA10

Institution
University Of Toronto (U Of T )

A B grade essay on the concept of evil. The essay proposes claims and counterclaims to the theory of the existence of god. The essay contains citations for further refernces. Please email if remarks on the essay are needed.

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3 pages

View example

Uploaded on February 2, 2022
Number of pages 3
Written in 2021/2022
Type Essay
Professor(s) Unknown
Grade B

reason and truth
essay
paper 1
problems of evil
with citation
claims and counters
philosophy

Institution
University of Toronto (U of T )
Education
Cell & Molecular Biology
Course
PHLA10

$8.99

Also available in package deal from $15.49

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Also available in package deal (1)

PHLA10 Paper 1 and 2

$ 19.48 $ 15.49 2 items

1. Essay - Essay 1 (problems of evil) phla10 - reason and truth
2. Essay - Paper 2 (descartes's dualism) phla10 - reason and truth
Show more

PHLA10 – Reason and Truth

Paper 1

The Problem of Evil

Generations of humans have believed in the existence of God, a being that has the ultimate powerful,
omnipotent, that is all knowing, omniscient, and that is morally perfect, omnibenevolent. But in times of
suffering and loss many people doubt the existence of God. How can such a being let suffering, pain, evil
be in our world? This doubt was dwelled into by a philosopher named Henry John McCloskey. He argued
that this is the problem of evil. This argument states the if god is omniscient, they know that evil exists;
if god is omnibenevolent, they would hate evil; and if god were omnipotent, they would have the power
to erase evil from existence, hence god and evil cannot coexist. It concludes that the existence of evil in
our earth indicates that god doesn’t exist. Throughout the course of this essay, I will be assessing
whether the argument works. (In section 1, I will present weaknesses in the premises of the problem of
evil claim and possible responses against the weakness. In section two I will analyze counterclaims
against the problem of evil.)

For clarity I would lie to define the meaning of good and evil that will be inferred in this paper. Good is
the interpretation of perfect morality and evil is the opposite of molarity also include evil included by
nature, for example, natural disasters.

Section 1 - weakness in the claim:

McCloskey’s claim is based on premises on god being omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. In
my view this premises makes the argument weak because it doesn’t explore if the idea of God being
omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient might be wrong. Wouldn’t the premise collapse if God
wasn’t omnipotent or omnibenevolent or omniscient, as they wouldn’t have the power to eliminate evil
or wouldn’t have the knowledge about evil or just would care about evil’s existence. Although if God is
defined in metaphysical way, they would still have great power, knowledge and moral. Therefore, the
problem of evil would still be justified.

Through another perspective the weakness in McCloskey’s claim could be the definition of evil. Evil in
the claim is subjective manifestations. Us humans have created the construct of right and wrong, good
and evil. What if no such thing exists? What if our understanding of evil is completely different from
what evil truly is? For example, when a predator kills its prey it feels no remorse, mostly because it
doesn’t believe in the construct of evil. The premise is based on the evidence and logic behind evil’s
existence, but the evil McCloskey talks about is only our perception of evil. Therefore, the argument is
weak. Why would god eliminate something we believe is evil?

Section 2 – analysis of responses against the problem of evil/theodicies:

John Hick present a response against the problem of evil by claiming that the world contains evil
because it is soul-improving and for spiritual growth not because god doesn’t exsist. Hick suggests that
the evil is for greater good and therefore it is justifying that God and evil can coexist for the better of

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fizaladha. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

65555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling