Essay

Assess the view that the US amendment process is in need of reform.

0 purchase

Course
Unit 4 - Extended Themes in Political Analysis

Institution
PEARSON (PEARSON)

Essay + plan outlining the pros and cons of the US amendment process and the different lines of arguments that suggest it should either be reformed or left in its current state.

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2 pages

View example

Uploaded on February 4, 2022
Number of pages 2
Written in 2021/2022
Type Essay
Professor(s) Unknown
Grade A+

us politics
amendment process
us amendment process
us constitution
constitution
federalism
reform
states
supreme court
bill of rights
senate
congress
house of representatives
legaslative
ratified
us
d

Study Level
A/AS Level
Examinator
PEARSON (PEARSON)
Subject
Government and Politics
Unit
Unit 4 - Extended Themes in Political Analysis

jess770

Member since 3 year 7 documents sold

$5.69

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Assess the view that the amendment process is in need for reform?

Pros of US Amendment process Cons of US Amendment process

 Prevents an abuse of power  Difficult to remove outdated aspects
 It protects the individual states and  Supreme Court could be considered to
upholds federalism have excessive power
 Very difficult to amend which is a pro  Could be viewed as undemocratic (as
and a con. In this case it prevents a little as 2% of the population can block
tyrannous president leader from amendment)
threatening the rights of the people  It takes a long time- due to caution
(inalienable rights) around amendments+ the polarised
 Furthermore, its complicated nature nature of the US itself, democrats and
prevents unnecessary amendments or republicans have very different views
unpractical amendments, meaning within their own parties (depending on
amendments proposed have to be state etc.) as well as between
carefully considered prohibition themselves. Even amendments with a
 Its efficient, 27(or 17) have been able to large support group such as Equal rights
get through the system for women have often been proposed
but not acted upon.

The US is governed under an entrenched and codified constitution, of which the first ten
amendments make up the Bill of Rights whilst the remaining 17 are known as the constitutional
rights. The Founding Fathers (Maddison, Washington etc.) deliberately aimed to create a
constitution which one, protected the rights of American citizens from a potentially tyrannous
leader, like its predecessor George III, whilst simultaneously keeping the population under control by
setting clear rules (the constitution) they should live under to prevent revolution. However, the
founding fathers appreciated the idea of popular sovereignty, in which the government is
accountable to the people, hence in creation of the Constitution they allowed amendments to be
made, to ensure the constitution can and reflect the modern world. In order for a proposed
amendment to be ratified it needs to obtain 2/3 in both the House of Representatives and the
Senate as well as ¾ of the state legislatures. This is widely viewed as both a positive and negative
aspect of the amendment process, however I would argue that the principle of having an
amendment process which in practice protects the rights (the ones that have been added to the
constitution so far) of the people making them inalienable unless majority of the country can come
to the agreement to change or remove them is a valuable part of the US political system. However, I
also acknowledge the restrictions to the amendment process which many view as undemocratic due
to as little as 2% of the population being able to block an amendment. Therefore, I agree that the US
Constitution should be reformed partially, by potentially lowering the required percentage needed in
order to pass amendments which are highly demanded by a large proportion of the US (such as the
right and access to abortions). However the process of requiring the votes of both houses in
congress as well as the state legislature should remain as it is, in my opinion, as it protects the rights
of both the people and the individual states in order to reflects the variation of views amongst the
50 states.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jess770. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.69. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Essay

Assess the view that the US amendment process is in need of reform.

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview