100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Exam summary tort law $18.05
Add to cart

Summary

Exam summary tort law

1 review
 131 views  10 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Core themes with applicable law sorted for the 3 different jurisdictions - Requirements for application of laws for 3 different jurisdictions German tort law, English tort law, French tort law

Preview 4 out of 58  pages

  • February 13, 2022
  • 58
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: maryviennes • 7 months ago

avatar-seller
English tort law  Always tell why other torts do not apply, so cut out categories from the beginning, but don’t jump to a tort directly.
First dismiss all the other ones

French law  1240 always mention that there might be a statutory duty, but that would require more research


Fault based liability  basics

Negligence  England, France, Germany

Breach of statutory duty  England, Germany, France (+EU law)

English torts

Wrongfulness Germany

Wrongfulness France

Strict liability

,FAULT BASED LIABILITY:
Fault-based-liability  liability of one’s own fault




 Wrongfulness/ Fault
 An act or behavior from the tortfeasor that should not have been committed
 2 Elements:
o 1. Wrongfulness  Objective side to look at the tort, meaning that the tort, legally, should not have been committed
o 2. Culpability  Subjective side of the tort, legally speaking, it is to determine whether the act can be attributed to the person (some
torts require special form of culpability: intention)

 Causality
 The harm is caused by the fault, wrongful action must have caused harm (i.e. driving through traffic light and not causing accident is not a
tort)

o Factual causation (condicio sine qua non: establishing a legal causation

 What would have happened if the act would not have occurred? (“But-for” test in English law)

o Legal causation: limits the extent of liability by not awarding compensation to losses which are too loosely connected to the wrongful act
 remoteness or foreseeability (England)
 direct and immediate consequence (France)

,  attributability of damage to the fault (Germany/The Netherlands)
 proximate cause (U.S.A.)


 Harm
 Interest of the victim has been injured
 Material (pain, injury, damage to property etc.)
 Immaterial (psychological damage etc.)

, Negligence  England, Germany, France
It could be argued that this would lead to (tort of) negligence, on the basis of ……..

England Germany France
Requirements: (Found in Eric Tjong Tjin Tai 5 Schritte zu Negligence (1. Tatbestand, 2. 3 Schritte zu Negligence (Faute, Damage,
p.51/52)  As they have been established/ Rechtswiedrigkeit, 3. Verschulden, 4. Causality, Causation)
mentioned in the Robinson Case v Chief 1. Faute (art. 1240 and 1241 Cc)
5. Damage)
Constable of West Yorkshire Police case.

1. the existence of a duty of care, 1. Tatbestand: Violation of codified normative  Reasonable man test: (Van Dam Section
804)
rule (objective fault)
 Wenn PERSONAL INJURY/  §823 I BGB (: infringement to the right of
A reasonable person have/ would not have
PROPERTY DAMAGE, dann Donoghue life, health, personal liberty, or another right ……  skills and knowledge of the
and Stevenson  always starting point for fault defendant)
liability)
 Wenn PURE ECONOMIC LOSS, dann  §826 BGB (if intentionally)
 4 factor test, for whether of duty of care has
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v. Heller &
been breached (In the first requirement of
Partners Ltd 2. Wrongfulness (Rechtswiedrigkeit) show the tort of negligence): (From Tutorial 4)
how above provisions breached (objective fault)
2. a breach of that duty,
 Identified provision, what was the harm 1) probability of causing harm
2) seriousness of expected harm
4 factor test, for whether of duty of care has 3) burden of precautionary measures
been breached (In the first requirement of 3. Verschulden – 5 criteria + §276 BGB (act 4) character and benefit of the conduct
the tort of negligence): (From Tutorial 4) contrary to care required by society) (subjective
fault) 2. Damage
1) probability of causing harm
2) seriousness of expected harm  Material/ Immaterial
1) Reasonable man test: (Van Dam Section 804)  Personal injury + property damage + pure
3) burden of precautionary measures
economic loss

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anouschkaK. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $18.05. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

51662 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$18.05  10x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added