AI (weak vs. strong)
Weak
● Philosophical stance
● Computers can simulate the mind but don’t show true intelligence/thinking
Strong
● Computers are intelligent just as humans are
● Chess & radiology AI outperforms humans
○ Domain-specific
Altered states of consciousness
● Temporary nature of alterations in representational mechanisms of consciousness
● Textbook
○ Spontaneously → drowsiness, daydreaming, hypnosis, sleep
○ Physically/physiologically induced → starvation, sexual activity, temperature
○ Psychologically induced → sensory deprivation, meditation, hypnosis
○ Disease induced → psychotic disorders, coma, epilepsy
○ Pharmacologically induced
● Laureys (systematic)
○ Arousal (wakefulness → brainstem)
○ Awareness (of self + environment → integrated cortex
○ Dissociative states: sleepwalking, vegetative, seizures)
● Hobson
○ Arousal
○ Input source (internal / external)
○ Mode of processing
■ Ratio of amines : choline
■ Wake : REM sleep
■ Rational : irrational thoughts
● Tart
○ Rationality
○ Hallucinations
Automata
● 18th century hoax (chess)
● Abstract machines that process input things from symbols → accept/reject
Arguments for consciousness in AI
● Biological = no
● Lovelace = no
○ Computers can’t do anything new because they’re preprogrammed
○ Criticism: creative algorithms + evolution + cheating behaviour
● Computationalist = yes
○ Substrate independence
● Consciousness as emergent property = yes
○ Phenomena arise from lower more simple processes
,Behavioural criteria for inferring consciousness in other species
● Self recognition
● Theory of mind
● Imitation
● Language
Binding problem
● Binding features of object while separating them from features of other objects
● Integration + segregation
● Solution: synchronisation of neuronal firing
○ Binds attributes by firing in synchrony
○ Gamma oscillation is the neural correlate of visual awareness
■ Feature binding
■ Short term memory tasks
○ Helps a coalition in the competition for consciousness
Binocular Rivalry
● Different images presented to each eye → perception flipping
● Images compete for consciousness
● Inferior temporal cortex
● Activation = awareness
● Problems
○ Results are only correlational
○ Doesn’t explain how consciousness is generated
Bistable perception
● Stimuli have 2 distinguishable stable forms
● Necker cube → either points up or down
Blindsight
● Seeing without vision
● Patients guessing → correct most of the time
● Cause: carbon monoxide exposure
○ Early visual pathway
● Treatment: sensory substitution
Brain regions related to consciousness
● Brain stem: medulla, pons, midbrain (cardiac, respiratory functions)
● Cerebellum: basal motor + cognitive functions
● Thalamus: relaying information
● Hippocampus: memories
● Amygdala: emotions
● Neocortex: motor + higher sensory functions (especially humans)
Brain measures / methods to record brain activity
● Single cell recordings
, ○ Monkeys → electrodes
○ Pro: zooms into functionality of specific neurons
○ Con: ethics prevent from using in humans
● fMRI
○ Functionality of brain
○ Blood-oxygenation levels in brain areas
○ High oxygen = high activity
○ Pro: non-invasive
● PET
○ Neurochemical communication in brain
○ Specific neurotransmitters
○ Con: invasive (radioactive fluids)
● MEG
○ Magnetic fields in brain
● EEG
○ Brain activity in brain
○ Similar to single cell recordings (electrodes)
○ Pro: non-invasive + can measure neural networks
○ Con: only measures activity on surface of brain
Cartesian Theatre
● All consciously experienced info comes together in the mind/brain
Categories of meditation
● Focused attention
○ Keep focus on specific part of environment
○ Stabilise attention
● Open monitoring
○ Monitor overall field of experience with meta-awareness
○ Approach thoughts in open + receptive + non-judgmental (flowing river)
○ Allows deeper insights in the mind
● Non-dual awareness meditation
○ Absence of self, space, time
○ Beyond subject-object distinction
○ Non-conceptual
Change blindness
● Not noticing difference between two pictures
● Due to brain injury
● Suggests:
○ We don’t have stable view of the world
○ Integration of successive views isn’t necessary
○ Big gap between what we actually see vs what we think we see (illusion)
Chinese room argument
● Biological argument (NO)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kimfedrigo. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.94. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.