100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Complete samenvatting Strategic Storytelling: colleges, gastcolleges & artikelen $6.98
Add to cart

Summary

Complete samenvatting Strategic Storytelling: colleges, gastcolleges & artikelen

1 review
 107 views  8 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Samenvatting van hoorcolleges, gastcolleges, abstract (en vaak) conclusies van artikelen

Preview 6 out of 89  pages

  • April 3, 2022
  • 89
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: Manon4 • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
1



Strategic Storytelling

, 2

Samenvatting van hoorcolleges, gastcolleges, abstract (en vaak) conclusies van artikelen
door Sophie Gersjes




Week 1
Artikel 1: ORAL NARRATIVES OF PERSONAL EXPERIENCE

- William Labov

Narrative is defined as one way of recounting past events, in which the order of

narrative clauses match the order of events as they occurred.



Structural organization of narrative

, 3

Narrative structure is established by the existence of temporal juncture between two

independent clauses (verbinding van tijd).

- Temporal juncture is said to exist between two such clauses when a change in

the order of the clauses produces a change in the interpretation of the order of the

referenced events in past time. These are narrative clauses.

- Narrative clauses respond to a potential question, “what happened then?” and

form the complicating action of the narrative.



1. Begins with Orientation → who, when, where & what were they doing.
Introducing and identifying the participants in the actions: the time, the
place and the initial behavior.
2. Ends with Coda → statement that returns to the present, precluding the
question → precludes (uitsluiten) what happened then?


Evaluative component

To establish the evaluative point of the story we find irrealis clauses (irreel) —negatives,

conditionals (condities), futures (voorspellingen) ,—which refer to events that did not

happen or might have happened or had not yet happened.

- Irrealis clauses evaluate the events that did occur by comparing them in an

evaluation section.

- Narrators can interrupt the story to describe how they felt, quote themselves,

cite a third party or speak for themselves.

- Evaluation provides justification for the claim. It's a response to so what.

- Sequences of clauses of equal duration may be termed chronicles: not designed

to evaluate.

- Evaluative clauses are concentrated in an evaluation section suspending
the action before a critical event → establish point of the narrative.


Reportability and credibility

Reportability & tellability justification of the delivery of the narrative and the claim on

social attention needed to deliver it.

- Relative to situation and relations with the audience.

, 4

- Most narratives are focused on a most reportable event.

- Reporting only most important does only form the abstract not the narrative.

- There is an inverse relationship between reportability and credibility: the more

reportable the less credible.

- A resource for credibility is objective evaluation.



Preconstruction

Where should I begin? Given the marked reportability of e0 and the need to establish its

credibility, the narrator must answer the question, “How did this (remarkable) event

come about?” You cannot begin with e0.

- The answer requires a shift of focus backwards in time to a precursor event e-1,

which is linked to e0 in the causal network in which events are represented in

memory.

- The causal links may be event to goal, goal to attempt, or attempt to outcome.

- Process continues recursively until the question why did you do that is absurd

since everything is described.

- The mundane event (alledaagse gebeurtenis) is mostly the orientation.

- Triggering events come after the orientation and head to the reportable event.



Praise and blame

The participants in many narratives include protagonist (hoofdpersoon), antagonist

(tegenstander) and third party witnesses (derden), of which the first is the most

complex.

- One can identify many egos present: the self as original author of the narrative

and its immediate animator; the self as actor; the self as generalized other

(normally as “you”); the anti-self as seen by others; and the principal, the self in

whose interest the story is told.

- The re-creation of the causal network involves the assignment of praise and

blame for the critical events and their outcomes.

- Most narratives of conflict involve linguistic devices that contribute to

- Polarization of prot and ant.

, 5

- Other forms lead to integration.

- Devices used contain deletion of events, manipulation of grammatical features of

voice (active/passive/zero causatives/authority/) and adding pseudo events. E.g.

My dad let me go with him.

When the manipulations are removed it is possible to approximate the original chain of

events on which the narrative is based. A useful exercise is a sub rosa: in the interest of

the antagonist. When comparing these it deepens the understanding.



Artikel 2: Narratieve Analyse (Sanders & Krieken)

Dit is een uitgebreid artikel met voorbeelden wat handig is om zelf ook helemaal

te lezen.

- Stap 1: stel vast of het om een verhaal gaat Is er tijdverloop tussen

specifieke gebeurtenissen die beleefd worden door een specifieke

persoon of groep personen?

- Stap 2: identificeer de gebruikscontext Identificeer het onderwerp.

Identificeer de zender. Identificeer de primaire doelgroep en eventuele

meelezende, secundaire doelgroep(en). Identificeer de communicatieve

doelen en de organisatiedoelen (dit is vergelijkbaar met de eerste stap

van een functionele analyse, zie hoofdstuk 1).

- Stap 3: identificeer het verhaalplot Identificeer en analyseer de

vertelwaardige gebeurtenis. Identificeer en analyseer de elementen van

de grondstructuur (orientation, complicating actions, critical event,

resolution, evaluations, coda). Identificeer en analyseer terugkerende

thema’s (motieven).

- Stap 4: analyseer de narratologische kenmerken Analyseer de temporele

structuur (met name chronologie, flashback, flashforward). Analyseer de

verteller (extradiëgetisch, intradiëgetisch). Analyseer de personages en de

rollen die zij vervullen (met name held, opponent, et cetera; round en flat

characters).

, 6


- Stap 5: analyseer de talige en tekstuele kenmerken Analyseer de

tijdkenmerken (met name werkwoordtijden, versnelling, vertraging).

Analyseer de uitdrukkingen van perspectief (verwijzingen naar

personages; interne, externe focalisatie; demonstratie, invasie). 26

Analyseer de citaten (met name directe, indirecte en vrije indirecte rede).

- Stap 6: evalueer de gemaakte keuzes en doe verbetersuggesties Is het

kernverhaal passend bij de communicatieve doelen en organisatiedoelen?

Zijn de narratologische elementen geschikt om de communicatieve

doelen en eventuele organisatiedoelen te bereiken? Zijn de tekstuele

kenmerken geschikt om de communicatieve doelen en eventuele

organisatiedoelen te bereiken? Welke verbetersuggesties kun je op basis

van de analyse doen?


Artikel 3: Strategisch communiceren met narratieven

Paradoxale functies en effecten José Sanders* en Kobie van Krieken*

Inleiding

Verhalen kunnen worden ingezet voor het vergroten van begrijpelijkheid of

overtuigingskracht. Onder welke voorwaarden dit effectief is, is minder bekend. In het

artikel gaat het over de begrijpelijkheid en overtuigingskracht van verhalen. Verhalen

hebben drie effecten:

1. affectief/persuasief, meer dan een uiteenzetting van feiten

2. Stellen levendig voor ogen

3. Identiteit geven aan lezers (voorbeeldrol).

In dit artikel worden verhalen in strategische vorm gezien.



Wat is een verhaal (en wat is het niet?)

Def verhalende tekst: uiteenzetting die verwijst naar in de tijd geplaatste, momentane

gebeurtenissen die standaard in chronologische volgorde worden weergegeven. Het

verloop van de tijd staat los van de verteltijd hier en nu. Dit betekent dat er een

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sophiegersjes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.98. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.98  8x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added