100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
“The signing of the Nazi soviet pact in 1939 reflected the total failure of Stalin’s foreign policy” A* essay $4.69   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

“The signing of the Nazi soviet pact in 1939 reflected the total failure of Stalin’s foreign policy” A* essay

1 review
 182 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

This is an A* essay which comes with real teacher feedback. It is a great tool to use to emulate and use for revision in your exams. The title is “The signing of the Nazi soviet pact in 1939 reflected the total failure of Stalin’s foreign policy”. Assess the validity of this view. Message me ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • April 8, 2022
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: gracewilsonxo • 8 months ago

avatar-seller
“The signing of the Nazi soviet pact in 1939 reflected the total failure of Stalin’s foreign
policy”. Assess the validity of this view. A* essay




Teacher feedback:
 You have followed a clear and coherent structure throughout and have understood
the question and its demands well.
 A well organised answer and well substantiated.
 To improve this challenge yourself more with your analysis, question how far his
foreign policy was consistent?
 Perhaps use more statistics and facts in your answer to justify your arguments and
make it more judicious in its analysis.


The signing of the Nazi- Soviet pact in 1939 undoubtedly mirrored the growing failure of
Stalin’s foreign policy. However, to label his foreign policy as a “total” failure would be ill-
judged. While it cannot be disputed that Stalin’s foreign policy was inherently inconsistent
and subscribed to no particular order, this still does not reduce it to being a “total” failure. A
foreign policy that is “totally” a failure would be one where war is inevitable from multiple
nations. However, Stalin did try to remain at peace with many countries such as France and
the UK. The signing of the Nazi Soviet pact only reflected that Stalin’s foreign policy was
more unsuccessful than successful but cannot be described to be a “total” failure as many
would argue as he avoided war and sought peaceful relations with many countries.
Firstly, the signing of the Nazi- Soviet pact in 1939 did in fact reflect the inconsistent and
growing failure of Stalin’s foreign policy. Despite signs that war was inevitable with Germany,
Stalin still refused to prepare Russia for war through maintaining stronger relations with the
western allies but instead sought to maintain peace with Germany when it was clear that war
was inevitable. For example, in 1936 Hitler began rearming his army in the Rhineland which
directly violated the terms of the Treaty of Versailles with the western allies. The biggest
reason why the Nazi Soviet pact reflected the growing failure of Stalin’s foreign policy was
because he was incapable of acknowledging the fact that if Hitler could breach the
conditions of the treaty of Versailles, he was more than capable of doing the same to the
Nazi Soviet pact of 1939. Stalin signing the pact in 1939 reflected how he was simply
incapable of judging threats from potential enemies which therefore justifies how the signing
of the Nazi Soviet pact in 1939 did in fact reflect the growing failure of his policies. It does
not however reflect the ‘total’ failure of his policies. A foreign policy that is a ‘total’ failure
would be one where Russia would immediately be drawn into conflict and war with multiple
nations including the western allies. Because Russia was not in this predicament until Hitler
invaded in 1941, it demonstrates how Stalin’s foreign policy was not a total failure but one
with many flaws.
Furthermore, while his foreign policy was not a total failure, the failure from signing the Nazi
Soviet pact in 1939 is accurately seen through the anti-comitern pact in 1936 which both
Germany and Japan signed. This occurred three years before the signing of the Nazi Soviet
pact in 1939 and should have highlighted to Stalin the hostility which Germany was exerting
towards the USSR. The anti-comitern pact effectively maintained that both countries would
take joint action if they had ‘interference’ (the USSR) in their internal affairs. Stalin should
have recognised this threat and bond between the ‘axis’ countries of Japan, Germany and

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller JiyaImran. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.69. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81849 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.69  2x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart