Class notes
Burgerlijk Recht 3 Hoorcolleges
- Course
- Institution
Zeer uitgebreide en volledige uitwerking van de hoorcolleges Burgerlijk Recht 3 inclusief gegeven voorbeelden
[Show more]
Seller
Followmarloesmarloes
Content preview
HoorcollegesStrafprocesrecht Rechtsmiddelen 2021-2022
Master Nederlands recht specialisatie strafrecht
Inhoudsopgave
Hoorcollege 1 (Collegeweek 1 hoorcollege a) Inleiding...................................................................................5
, Wat zijn rechtsmiddelen?.....................................................................................................................................6
Waarom zijn er rechtsmiddelen opengesteld?.....................................................................................................7
Recht op rechtsmiddel?........................................................................................................................................8
Krombach v. France arrest...............................................................................................................................9
NL: anonieme verdachten arrest (K/K 17.3.2)................................................................................................10
Papon v. France arrest (EHRM 25 juli 2002)...................................................................................................10
........................................................................................................................................................................10
Procedure rechtsmiddel......................................................................................................................................11
Kremzow v. Oostenrijk arrest.........................................................................................................................11
Hermi v. Italië arrest.......................................................................................................................................12
Gesloten stelsel...................................................................................................................................................12
HR 1 februari 1991, NJ 1991, 413 m.nt. Th.W van Veen arrest (Maatstaf Kostovski)...................................13
Hoorcollege 2 (Collegeweek 1 hoorcollege b) Rechtsmiddelen algemeen I....................................................13
Competentie in appel en cassatie.......................................................................................................................14
NJ 2019/381 tenlastelegging bepalend voor competentie............................................................................15
Aanwenden rechtsmiddel...................................................................................................................................18
NJ 1999,136 verkeerd rechtsmiddel ingesteld..............................................................................................18
Welk rechtsmiddel staat open? ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AB1592............................................................................19
Partieel appel......................................................................................................................................................19
HR 3 april 2007, LJN AZ8393 partieel appel...................................................................................................20
Beperkingen in akte ECLI:NL:HR:2011:B04030..............................................................................................20
NJ 2018/284 t.a.v. aparte beslagbeslissing....................................................................................................20
Wijze van aanwenden........................................................................................................................................21
NJ 1987, 134 Confraternele hulp:...................................................................................................................21
Verzuim griffier NJ 1985, 137.........................................................................................................................21
HR 23 juni 1987, NJ 88/352 instellen rechtsmiddel brief naar griffier...........................................................22
Volgens de regelen der kunst 1 ECLI:NL:HR:2009:BJ7819.............................................................................23
Volgens de regelen der kunst 2 ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BV6999............................................................................23
NJ 2018/49 machtiging griffier schriftelijk gemachtigde voor instellen rechtsmiddel..................................24
NJ 2015, 473 rechtsmiddel instellen per email:.............................................................................................24
ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2654 rechtsmiddel instellen per email...............................................................................24
ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2655 schriftelijke volmacht advocaat ondertekend door juridisch medewerker..............25
ECLI:NL:HR:2017:2533 Persoonlijk inleveren grievenformulier bij griffie......................................................25
NJ 2018/322 Adres raadsman voor oproeping zitting hoger beroep.............................................................25
HR NJ 2001/499 Anoniem aanwenden rechtsmiddel:...................................................................................25
NJ 2019/337 beroep door politieman ingesteld onder codenummer...........................................................25
Hoorcollege 3 (Collegeweek 2 hoorcollege a) Rechtsmiddelen algemeen II...................................................27
Schrifturen..........................................................................................................................................................27
HR 12 januari 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:17 vereisten grieven..........................................................................28
Inhoud grieven I NJ 2019/121........................................................................................................................29
Inhoud grieven II NJ 2019/122.......................................................................................................................29
Termijnen............................................................................................................................................................29
ECLI:NL:HR:2017:2316 aanvang appeltermijn................................................................................................30
HR 2 oktober 2018, NJ 2018/404 bekendheid met einduitspraak.................................................................30
HR 22 mei 2018, NJ 2018/264 met welke informatie moet verdachte bekend zijn......................................30
Verontschuldigbare overschrijding NJ 2001, 696...........................................................................................31
ECLI:NL:HR:2019:1534 termijnoverschrijding niet vertaalde dagvaarding:...................................................31
ECLI:NL:HR:2019:1541 termijnoverschrijding niet vertaalde dagvaarding:...................................................31
HR 1 december 2015 (ECLI:NL:2015:3428)verzuim raadsman I....................................................................32
EHRM Andreyev v. Estland.............................................................................................................................32
, HR 12 januari 2016 (ECLI:NL:HR:2016:16)Verzuim raadsman II....................................................................32
Intrekken.............................................................................................................................................................33
HR 19 september 2017, ECLI: 2401 betwisting afstand hoger beroep..........................................................33
Bezwaren laten varen ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BP2709...........................................................................................33
Ingetrokken blijft ingetrokken NJ 1999, 105..................................................................................................34
Intrekking hoger beroep na cassatieberoep ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1236?...........................................................34
Hoorcollege 4 (Collegeweek 2 hoorcollege b) Hoger beroep.........................................................................35
Inzenden hoger beroep.......................................................................................................................................35
HR 3 april 2012, BV7417 betekening hoger beroep.......................................................................................36
Appelschriftuur...................................................................................................................................................36
Verlofstelsel........................................................................................................................................................37
Lalmahomed v. Nederland EHRM 22 februari 2011......................................................................................37
Behandeling in hoger beroep.............................................................................................................................38
Stukken en getuigen...........................................................................................................................................39
HR NJ 2000/214 overleggen nieuwe stukken.................................................................................................39
HR 1 juli 2014, ECLI:NL:HR:2014:1496............................................................................................................39
4 juli 2017, ECLI 2017:1015 Motivering getuigenverzoek..............................................................................41
HR 12 september 2017, ECLI 2017:2324 schriftuur houdende opgave van getuigen...................................42
HR 20 april 2021, ECLI:NL:HR:2021:576 Post Keskin......................................................................................42
Ambtshalve oproepen getuigen ECLI:NL:HR:2021:1406................................................................................43
Hoorcollege 5 (Collegeweek 3 hoorcollege a) Hoger beroep II.......................................................................44
Art. 422 Sv: beraadslagingsvoorschrift...............................................................................................................45
Verweren en motiveren NJ 2003, 187............................................................................................................45
Art. 422a Sv: nietigheid dagvaarding 1e aanleg................................................................................................46
Art. 423 Sv: bevestigen en vernietigen; terugwijzen..........................................................................................47
Bevestigen of gemotiveerd vernietigen ECLI:NL:HR:BM0256........................................................................47
Bevestigen van een ontoereikend gemotiveerd vonnis ECLI:HR:2013:BZ5960.............................................49
........................................................................................................................................................................50
Art. 423 lid 2 Sv naar analogie? NJ 1998, 516................................................................................................50
HR 5 oktober 2004, LJN AP0187 persoon met kernrol aanwezig..................................................................50
Hoorcollege 6 (Collegeweek 3 hoorcollege b) Verzet bij OM-afdoening.........................................................52
Actualiteiten strafbeschikking............................................................................................................................52
Ontwikkeling strafrechtelijke afdoening buiten proces......................................................................................52
Strafbeschikking nader bezien............................................................................................................................54
Verzet tegen strafbeschikking............................................................................................................................55
Executie...............................................................................................................................................................56
Kritiek..................................................................................................................................................................56
Hoorcollege 7 (Collegeweek 4 hoorcollege a) Cassatie I................................................................................57
Kenmerken rechtspraak HR................................................................................................................................57
Cassatiegronden.................................................................................................................................................58
Mogelijkheden van cassatieberoep....................................................................................................................59
Toetsing van vrijspraken ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5061.......................................................................................60
........................................................................................................................................................................60
Eisen cassatieberoep..........................................................................................................................................61
, Oneigenlijke middelen NJ 2002, 77................................................................................................................62
Hoorcollege 8 (Collegeweek 4 hoorcollege b) Cassatie II...............................................................................63
Omvang toetsing door de HR............................................................................................................................63
Ambtshalve cassatie..........................................................................................................................................63
Ambtshalve cassatie ECLI:NL:HR:2013:704....................................................................................................64
Feiten..................................................................................................................................................................65
Denatureren BL5543......................................................................................................................................65
Klimmuur HR 7 februari 2012.........................................................................................................................67
Art. 81 en 80a RO................................................................................................................................................67
Overzichtsarrest 80a RO I ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BX0129 Overzichtsarrest 80a RO II ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1005.....68
Hoorcollege 9 (Collegeweek 5 hoorcollege a) Rechtsmiddelen tegen beschikkingen......................................71
Inleiding..............................................................................................................................................................71
Bron beschikkingen.............................................................................................................................................72
Rechtsmiddelen tegen beschikkingen.................................................................................................................74
Cassatieberoep beschikkingen ECLI:NL:HR:2009:BG6595.............................................................................74
Duur lijfsdwang en 446 Sv ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BL1706.....................................................................................74
Procedure............................................................................................................................................................75
Hoorcollege 10 (Collegeweek 5 hoorcollege b) Buitengewone rechtsmiddelen.............................................76
Inleiding..............................................................................................................................................................76
Cassatie i.h.b.d. wet...........................................................................................................................................77
Prejudiciële vragen............................................................................................................................................77
Herziening...........................................................................................................................................................77
Herziening ten voordele.....................................................................................................................................78
Puttense moordzaak......................................................................................................................................78
Lucia de B.......................................................................................................................................................79
Eisen deskundigeninzicht ECLI:NL:HR:2016:735............................................................................................79
........................................................................................................................................................................79
Het rode verkeerslicht NJ 1979, 340..............................................................................................................79
Procedure............................................................................................................................................................80
Wet herziening ten nadele..................................................................................................................................81
Vivaldi ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2520........................................................................................................................81
Hoorcollege 11 (Collegeweek 6 hoorcollege a) Tenuitvoerlegging en gratie...................................................83
Inleiding..............................................................................................................................................................83
............................................................................................................................................................................84
Aanvullende rol voorzieningenrechter................................................................................................................84
Art. 557 Sv en de civiele weg NJ 1991, 648....................................................................................................84
Strekking en toepassingsbereik 577b Sv ECLI:NL:HR:2017:970.....................................................................84
Opschortende werking........................................................................................................................................85
Gratie..................................................................................................................................................................87
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller marloesmarloes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.76. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
57114 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now