Class notes
Strafrecht 3 hoorcolleges
- Course
- Institution
Zeer uitgebreide en volledige uitwerking van alle hoorcolleges van strafrecht 3 inclusief alle voorgeschreven jurisprudentie en voorbeelden
[Show more]
Seller
Followmarloesmarloes
Content preview
Strafrecht 3Hoorcolleges
2020-2021
,Inhoudsopgave
Hoorcollege 1a Inleiding Sv en EVRM ............................................................................................................... 5
‘Dronken broer’ (NJ 1996/23) ............................................................................................................................. 7
Ozturk v. Duitsland ............................................................................................................................................. 9
Hoorcollege 1b Voorbereidend onderzoek ..................................................................................................... 12
Zwolsman-arrest (NJ 1996/249) ....................................................................................................................... 15
Hoorcollege 2a Rechter/OM ........................................................................................................................... 24
Vooropgesteld (HR, bijv. NJ 2016/388): ........................................................................................................... 30
Vertrouwensbeginsel (HR, weer NJ 2016/388): ................................................................................................ 30
Willekeur (HR, weer NJ 2016/388): .................................................................................................................. 30
Hoorcollege 2b: het slachtoffer ...................................................................................................................... 31
Art. 2 EVRM Osman t. VK (1998; 23452/94) .................................................................................................... 34
Art. 4 EVRM Rantsev t. Cyprus & Rusland (2010) ............................................................................................. 34
Hoorcollege 3a (begin eindonderzoek) Dagvaarding en tenlastelegging ......................................................... 37
EHRM Colozza t. Italië ...................................................................................................................................... 38
o Jones v UK. aanwezigheidsrecht ............................................................................................................. 40
o Hennings. aanwezigheidsrecht ............................................................................................................... 40
o De Groot. aanwezigheidsrecht ................................................................................................................ 40
HR NJ 2015/75 → vermoeden van afstand van recht....................................................................................... 41
Overzichtsarrest NJ 2019/285 aanhoudingsverzoek ........................................................................................ 41
EVRM : De Salvador Torres t. Spanje Tenlastelegging...................................................................................... 42
EVRM : Pelissier en Sassi t. Frankrijk tenlastelegging....................................................................................... 42
EVRM : Mattoccia t. Italië tenlastelegging ....................................................................................................... 42
Hoorcollege 3b Onderzoek ter terechtzitting.................................................................................................. 46
NJ 2000/633 openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting: ............................................................................... 47
NJ 2002/498 openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting ................................................................................ 47
NJ 2015/312 openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting ................................................................................ 48
NJ 2016/362: openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting ............................................................................... 48
Riepan t. Oostenrijk, 2000 openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting ........................................................... 48
Tierce e.a. t. San Marino, 2000 openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting .................................................... 48
ECLI:NL:HR:2020:2008 openbaarheid onderzoek ter terechtzitting ................................................................. 48
De auditu-arrest (1926 NJ 1927/85) ................................................................................................................. 52
Mirilashvili t. Rusland 2008 de auditu vs fair hearing: ..................................................................................... 53
Hoorcollege 4a wettelijk bewijsstelsel ........................................................................................................... 54
• Foelke tegen Frankrijk onschuldpresumptie: .......................................................................................... 54
2
, • Arrest salabijaku rechtsvermoedens/bewijsvermoedens ....................................................................... 55
Jalloh art. 3 EVRM ............................................................................................................................................ 55
Gafgen art. 3 EVRM .......................................................................................................................................... 55
NJ 1981/13 geen wettig bewijs verklaringen raadsman TTZ............................................................................ 57
(NJ 2011/558) geen wettig bewijs spreekrechtverklaringen ............................................................................ 58
(NJ 2008/192) geen wettig bewijs reclasseringsrapporten .............................................................................. 58
(NJ 2007/134) geen wettig bewijs waarnemingen rechter buiten OTT ............................................................ 58
Cafe Brouwer verklaren en reden van wetenschap .......................................................................................... 58
• NJ 2011/375 Handelingen van getuigen geen verklaring ....................................................................... 58
HR NJ 2004/480 bewijs ..................................................................................................................................... 60
Hoorcollege 4b Bewijs getuigen en EHRM ...................................................................................................... 61
HR:2013:BZ5377 Splitsen van verklaringen ...................................................................................................... 62
▪ NJ 1986/444 feiten van algemene bekendheid ....................................................................................... 62
ACAB arrest feiten van algemene bekendheid ................................................................................................. 62
NJ 2012/252 unus testis ................................................................................................................................... 65
EHRM Al-Khawaja en Tahery ondervraging/verklaring getuige ...................................................................... 70
EHRM Schatschaschwili t. Duitsland (2015) ondervraging/verklaring getuige ................................................ 70
Keskin t. Nederland ondervraging/verklaring getuige ..................................................................................... 71
Vgl. CAG Paridaens ECLI:NL:PHR:2021:91 getuigen verklaring ........................................................................ 72
Hoorcollege 5a: Sanctionering van onregelmatigheden (I/II): bewijsuitsluiting .............................................. 73
Tweede bloedproefarrest (HR NJ 62/470) (bewijsuitsluiting voor wettelijke grondslag) ................................. 74
Erwtenpistool-arrest (HR NJ 78/365) bewijsuitsluiting voor wettelijke grondslag) .......................................... 74
Mentenarrest (NJ 78/358) buitenwettelijke sancties op onrechtmatighandelen:............................................ 74
Loze hashpijp / Afvoerpijp (2004) vormverzuimen art. 359a Sv: ...................................................................... 76
o HR NJ 2006/193 vormverzuim in zelfde vooronderzoek als tll feit .......................................................... 77
Khan t. VK (EHRM 12/5/00) EHRM dwingt niet bij elke verdragsschending tot bewijsuitsluiting. ................... 78
Allan t. UK schending art. 8 EVRM ook art. 6 EVRM zwijgrecht ....................................................................... 79
Criteria toepassing bewijsuitsl. (2013) aanscherping toepassing van art. 359a ter zake van bewijsuitlsuiting79
Arresten overzichtsarrest 1 dec. 2020 vormverzuim art. 359a Sv .................................................................... 80
Hoorcollege 5b sanctionering van onregelmatigheden (II/II): niet-ontvankelijkheid OM en strafvermindering
....................................................................................................................................................................... 81
Opsporing en sfeercumulatie (NJ 2017/456) HR art. 359a Sv beperkt tot vooronderzoek ............................... 82
EHRM Texeira de Castro niet ontvankelijkheid om .......................................................................................... 85
EHRM Ramanauskas niet ontvankelijkheid om ................................................................................................ 85
Ramanauskas OvJ in Litouwen ......................................................................................................................... 85
NJ 2010/440 HR & uitlokking ........................................................................................................................... 86
Shannon v. the United Kingdom HR: arrest 1 dec. 2020: r.o. 2.2.2 uitlokking private partij ............................ 88
HR:2020:1890 (1 dec 2020-arrest) 359a Sv voorbeeld strafvermindering ....................................................... 89
3
, Hoorcollege 6a: Het vonnis (I/II) ..................................................................................................................... 90
o vgl. HR NJ 85/534 UVV: ........................................................................................................................... 95
o HR NJ 74/518 UVV .................................................................................................................................. 96
o HR NJ 98/52 UVV: ................................................................................................................................... 96
NJ 06/85 UVV aanwezig raadsman .................................................................................................................. 97
NJ 07/146 UVV aanwezig raadsman ............................................................................................................... 98
- NJ 07/135 UVV aanwezig raadsman ...................................................................................................... 98
Hoorcollege 6b: het vonnis (II/II): strafmotivering ....................................................................................... 104
• NJ 2000/214 ambtshalve motiveringsplicht ......................................................................................... 110
o NJ 2006/314 ambtshalve- strafmotiveringsplicht ................................................................................. 111
• NJ 1988/320 ambtshalve- strafmotiveringsplicht ................................................................................. 112
• NJ 2007/630 ambtshalve motiveringsplicht ......................................................................................... 112
Arrest vrijheid feitenrechter (NJ 2010/393) rekening houden met wat voor dingen bij strafoplegging ........ 113
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller marloesmarloes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.77. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now