100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
CLG 001 Fiscal Law Questions /ANSWERS LATEST 2022 $15.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

CLG 001 Fiscal Law Questions /ANSWERS LATEST 2022

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

QUE ST ION 1 1. Which of the following is a correct statement of Fiscal Law Philosophy: If the law is silent as to whether a purchase can be made, it is probably safe to spend appropriated funds. Expenditure of appropriated funds is proper only when authorized by Congress. If the commander sa...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • April 18, 2022
  • 12
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
CLG 001 Fiscal Law Questions
i i i i




Q U E S TI O N i 1

1. i Which iof ithe ifollowing iis ia icorrect istatement iof iFiscal iLaw iPhilosophy:

iiii i If ithe ilaw iis isilent ias ito iwhether ia ipurchase ican ibe imade, iit iis
i probably isafe ito ispend iappropriated ifunds.
i i i i i Expenditure i of i appropriated i funds i is i proper i only i when i authorized

ib y iCongress.


i i i i i If ithe i commander isays ibuy i it, idon’t iworry i about iFiscal iLaw

iRegulations.


i i i i i Absent i a i specific i prohibition, i expending i appropriated i funds i is

ip ermitted.

20 ipoints
Q U E S TI O N
i 2




1. It iis iJuly i2010. iThe icontracting iofficer iat iFort iMason iis iabout ito iaward ia
icontract ifor ia icomputer isystem ithat i the iPost iEngineer iwill iuse i to itrack

iwork i orders i and i inventory. i This i $15,000 icomputer i system iis i readily

iavailable i within ia i few idays i from iany iof i several ilocal i vendors. i The iPost

iEngineer iintends i to iplace ithe i system iin i a iwarehouse i for i which

iconstruction i will i begin i in i December i2010. i The i contract i cites i FY i 2010,

iOperations i and i Maintenance, i Army i (OMA) i funds. i What i should i you

iadvise ithe icontracting iofficer?




iiii i The icontracting iofficer imay iaward i the icontract iciting iFY i2010 iOMA
ifunds. iObligating ifunds iin iJuly i2010 iwill inot iviolate ithe

iAntideficiency iAct. iThe iPost iEngineer, ihowever, imay inot ipay ifor ithe

isystem iuntil ithe iwarehouse iis icompleted.


i i i i i Because i the iPost iEngineer iwill iuse ithe isystem i to iperform

iinstallation ioperations, i and i because ithe i"lead i time" i exception

iclearly i permits i use i of i FY i 2010 i funds i for i the i system, i the i contract

iaward iis iproper.


i i i i i The icontracting iofficer ishould inot iaward ithis icontract. iTo ido isoiwould

iviolate ithe ibona ifide ineeds irule.


i i i i i Award inow iis iproper iif ithe iinstallation ilater iobtains iProcurement

ifunds i to ireplace ithe i funds i obligated ifor ithe i computer i system.


i i i i i None i of i the i above.


20 ipoints
Q U E S TI O N
i 3




1. If ia iparticular iexpenditure iis inot iprovided ifor iby iCongress, iin iorder ito
imeet ithe irequirements iof ithe iPurpose iStatute, i31 iU.S.C. i§ i1301, ithe

iexpenditure imust i be i necessary i and i incident i to i the i proper i execution i of

ithe i general i purpose iof i the i appropriation. i The iGAO i has i created ia i three-

ip art itest ito idetermine iwhether ian iexpenditure iis ia i“necessary

, CLG 001 Fiscal Law Questions
i i i i




expense” iof ian iappropriation. iWhich iof ithe ifollowing iIS iNOT ipart iof ithe
ithree-part ipurpose itest?




iiiiiiiiiii The i expenditure i must i be i necessary i and i incident i to i the i purposes
of ithe iappropriation.
i


i i i i i i i i i i iThe iexpenditure imust inot ibe iprohibited iby ilaw. i


The icomptroller imust icertify ithe ifunds.
i i i i i i i i i ii


iiiiiiiiiii The iexpenditure imust inot ibe iotherwise iprovided ifor.
20 ipoints
Q U E S TI O N
i 4




1. It iis i14 iSeptember i2010 iand iFort iTJAGLCS istill ihas i$4000 iin iFY i2010
i Operations i and i Maintenance, i Army i appropriations i that i it i "needs" i to

ispend. i MAJ i I.M. iThemann, i the i Supply i Officer i at i TJAGLCS, i has i a i brilliant

iidea. iAt i a i recent i union i meeting, i several iemployees i complained i about

ithe itaste iof ithe icold ibrown iwater icoming iout iof iseveral iwater ifountains.

iThe icold ibrown iwater, ihowever, iis inot iunhealthy, iunsafe, iunpotable, i or

i unwholesome. i MAJ i Themann i decides i Fort i TJAGLCS ishould i get i water

i coolers i to i use i as i substitutes i for ithe i water i fountains. iBy i calling i local

i vendors, i he i determines i $3600 i is i enough i money i to i pay ifor ione iyear iof

iwater idelivery iservice i(five iwater icoolers iand iten i5- igallon icontainers iof

iwater i for i each iof ithose iwater icoolers i each imonth).iMAJ iThemann ihas

istopped iby i your ioffice ito idetermine ihow ito i execute ithis i brilliant iidea

i and i whether i he i has i the i right i money i to i use. i He i wants ithe ibottled iwater

idelivery iservices ito icommence itomorrow, i15 iSeptember i 2010, i and i to

i last i through i 14 i September i 2011. i What i do i youitell ihim?




iiii i Use i of i FY i 2010 i Operations i and i Maintenance, i Army i appropriations
is iproper, iunder i10 iU.S.C. i§2410a, ito ibuy ithis ibottled iwater idelivery
i

iservice.


i i i i i Use i of ithe i FY i2010 i Operations i and iMaintenance, i Army

iappropriations i is i only i proper i to i cover i the i time i period i running i 15

iS eptember i 2010 i to i 30 i September i 2010. i Fort i TJAGLCS i must i fund

ithe i period i running i from i 1 i October i 2010 i to i 14 i September i 2011

iwith i FY i 2011 i Operations i and i Maintenance, i Army i Appropriations.


i i i i i Since i most iof i the i contract iperiod i is i FY i 2011, i this i is i clearly i a i bona

ifide i need i of i FY i 2011, i so iFort i TJAGLCS i must i use i FY i 2011 i Operations

i and i Maintenance, i Army i Appropriations i to i fund i the ientire

icontractual iperiod.


i i i i i Fort i TJAGLCS i may i not i use i appropriated i funds i of i any i kind i to i fund

ithe ipurchase iof ithe iwater ior ithe icoolers, iunder ithese ifacts.

20 ipoints
Q U E S TI O N i 5

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller academicmaster. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $15.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$15.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart