Ch 1 -Introduction
Significance the result you obtained is unlikely to occur if the factor you study does not hold
- Significance level of 5% normally used- the probability that the results were caused by
chance is less than 5%
Submit article to scientific journal peer review (check if results are viable) if accepted it will
be published
Reproducibility outcome should be independent, but the same effects should be found
- Journals usually don’t accept studies which are just replications of previous work
- Reputation of journals based on how many times the articles in the journal have been cited so
publishing replicated studies does not benefit the reputation of the journal
- When replicated significance goes down- example: 0.95x 0.95= 0.90 (1-0.90=0.1-10%
significance level)- this is just 1 study that has been replicated once
1-0.95N
What makes a scientist ‘successful’ number/impact of publications, H index, grants and
rewards
- They get an incentive to cheat to look better/make more
- Scientific misconduct = fraud
Pseudo explanations can explain everything but they don’t rule out anything and they don’t
allow you to make hypotheses
Chapter 2- Logical Positivism
Logical positivism (empiricism) the standard view of science- distinguishing between real
scientific knowledge and false knowledge- emphasis on the importance of verification of science
- Science is based on facts that you get from observing/experimenting based on facts you
derive generalizations that you can further test gradually you develop knowledge about the
topic and this knowledge is secure and based on scientific proof
- Vienna circle (Wiener Kreis) attributed for the views of logical positivism
- The nature of psychology was influenced by logical positivism- not the other way around
- Aims to provide a demarcation criterion between real knowledge and nonsense
Logical positivism came after positivism and can be based on Logic and observable facts
which allow us to create a basis for the scientific world and its method
- Also known as logical empiricism or inductivism
- According to LP, science is made obtaining observations to obtain facts, derive
generalizations from the facts (laws) and derive predictions (hypotheses) from the
generalizations to test them
Hypothesis potential explanation-specific enough to make a prediction
- When a hypothesis makes a selection between relevant and irrelevant facts, it can be tested
and then rejected or accepted on the basis of the outcome
, Positivism science should only be concerned with observations that could be made and
repeated by anyone- objective- completely based on observations
Law of nature when a generalization is sufficiently tested and supported by observation- the
highest form of empirical knowledge that humans can obtain
Theoretical concepts always traceable to observation and based on observable facts
- Uses operationalization you define a theoretical concept in terms of the way you can
observe/measure it
LP uses 2 forms of inference induction and deduction
- Induction used to derive generalizations
Induction generating a general statement from individual observations
- Used to link facts and laws in LP
- Uses terms ‘all’ or ‘no’
- Example- all people with MDD have a sleep disorder
- General statements can be laws of nature- general law of nature
Deduction generating an individual statement (conclusion) derived from other statements
(premises)- deduction is rock solid
- Using established generalizations as the basis of deductions
- Deduction the valid derivation of a statement on the basis of other statements
- Also known as syllogism- used for explanations and predictions
- Provides an explanation when the conclusion has been drawn without an explanation
- Categorical claims phrases using ‘all’ or ‘some’
- Initial condition the second premise of a syllogism- states a specific observation
Any explanation must be based on a deduction in which one or more general laws provide
explanatory power deductive nomological (D-N) model of explanation or prediction
- Whole set of premises used in deduction = Explanans
- The conclusion of deduction = Explanandum
LP also uses deduction to test a hypothesis
Falsification testing a hypothesis and finding it is not true
Verification when you test a hypothesis and it is true
Chapter 3- Popper and Falsificationism
Karl Popper criticized verification, was a member of the Vienna Circle however was a critic of
LP
- Verification does not prove a hypothesis- instead replaced verification with the term
confirmation- confirmation of a hypothesis not proof- Popper rejected this too
- Popper believes that the only certainties in science that we can get are from its failures
Falsification- the only certainties in science are the failures of science- the falsifications that
science has obtained- the best way knowledge can grow is through our attempt to correct our
errors- provides certainty
- Induction cannot produce certainty as the number if observations used in an induction will
always be limited compared to the generalizations made
- A theory cannot be falsified if it does not have empirical content
Dogmatic thinking (dogmatism)- popper’s description on the idea that science must be based only
off observations Very closed minded way of thinking
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mariannedahler11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.45. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.