100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary BPP LPC Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Law SGS notes $4.17   Add to cart

Summary

Summary BPP LPC Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Law SGS notes

7 reviews
 324 views  31 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Full SGS notes on Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Law. Includes a step by step guide on how to answer each possible exam question. Colour coded for ease of reference. Highway Code references and relevant statutes included.

Preview 4 out of 29  pages

  • April 25, 2022
  • 29
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
  • Unknown

7  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: joydale • 2 weeks ago

review-writer-avatar

By: esickoomson • 5 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: aneelamahmood53 • 6 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: Anwuri86 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: chloecanham14 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: evibal21 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: bahiyyahchadli13 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Med Negligence and Personal Injury
SGS notes




1

,Details about exam
3-hour paper
Section A - 5 MCQs on a variety of topics
 Roughly 3 marks per question. 15 marks in total


Section B- Personal injury
 Will be asked to draft a Particulars of Claim (PoC) or a Defence from scratch for an
employer’s liability, highway accident or road traffic accident scenario.

 Will be asked to conduct a case analysis of a personal injury claim of a road traffic
accident, highway accident or an accident at work (employers’ liability).

 Worth about 45 - 55 marks
Section C -Clinical negligence
 Worth about 25-35 marks
Permitted materials
 The Official Highway code
 Judicial college guidelines
 CPR Handbook 1
 Medical negligence and Personal injury (MNPI) resource pack


In exam, try and copy out the relevant statutes as accurately as you can when
answering a question!
Only refer to cases highlighted in chapter notes.




SGS1: Introduction to road traffic accident claims
2

,Meena Kazi case study

Meena Kazi (MK) had been for a meal with Janice Streeter (JS) and Vera. They all drunk some
alcohol. JS offered to drive Vera Wells (VW) and MK home. On the way home, the car ended up in an
accident. MK wants to issue proceedings against JS.

*Note: Limitation period expires 3 years later from date of accident or date of knowledge of the
accident e.g., if accident happened on 1st March 2021, limitation period ends on 1st March 2024 -
s11[4] Limitation Act 1980]



Common law duty

A driver has the duty to drive with reasonable care and skill expected of an ordinary competent
driver. Learner drivers are ALSO held to the same standard.

Highway codes (HC) book

 HC Rule 95 – Do not drink and drive (pg 29)
 HC Rule 124- Do not exceed the speed limit (pg 41)
 HC Rule 144 -Drive with due care and attention (pg 47)
 HC Rule 146 – Adapt driving to conditions of the road (pg 48)

*Note: Can refer to the Highway code in a case analysis but NOT in the Particulars of Claim.

Statutory duty

 To drive with due care and attention – ss.2 and 3 Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988)
 Not to drive whilst under the influence of alcohol- ss.4,5 and 11(2) RTA 1988
 Drive within the speed limit -ss.81, 86 and 89 RTRA 1984

*Note: Breaching the RTA 1988 is a CRIMINAL offence. Do not refer to a statute in the PoC because
you are dealing with a CIVIL matter.

When conducting a case analysis in the exam, follow this pattern:

1. Case analysis - Liability

Common law duty

State the common law duty:

 To drive with reasonable care and skill expected of an ordinary competent driver Nettleship
v Weston [1971])

State the relevant Highway Code(s):

 HC Rule 95 – do not drink and drive

State how there has been a breach of the common law duty. APPLY the scenario. E.g.

Janice in in breach of the common law duty by failing to drive with reasonable care and skill.

Although the Highway Code itself does not give rise to proceedings, it can be relied on in any
proceedings under S38[7] Road Traffic Act 1988.

3

, Statutory duty

State the relevant statutes. Be sure to write them out in full

 To drive with due care and attention under:
-s. 2 RTA 1988 - “A person who drives a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a
road or other public place is guilty of an offence” and;

-s. 3 RTA 1988 -“If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public
place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons
using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence”

 To not drive whilst under the influence of alcohol under:
-s.4 RTA 1988 – “A person who, when driving or attempting to drive a mechanically propelled
vehicle on a road or other public place, is unfit to drive through drink or drugs is guilty of an
offence”.

-s.5 RTA 1988 –“If a person—
(a)drives or attempts to drive a motor vehicle on a road or other public place, or
(b)is in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place,
after consuming so much alcohol that the proportion of it in his breath, blood or urine
exceeds the prescribed limit he is guilty of an offence”.

-s.11(2) RTA 1988 – definition of prescribed limit of alcohol
(a) 5 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath,
(b) 80 milligrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood, or
(c) 107 milligrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of urine,


State how the statutory duty has been breached. APPLY the scenario. E.g.

Janice is in breach of the statutory duty by driving whilst under the influence of alcohol.

2. Case analysis – Causation and defences

Causation

State factors that could have caused the accident e.g. speeding, alcohol, conditions of the road, poor
weather. APPLY the facts in the scenario. E.g.

-It had been raining on the night Janice was driving the car, this could have led to her car skidding on
the road and losing control.

-Janice's dangerous driving had caused her to lose control of the vehicle, causing the car to swerve
thus resulting in the injuries sustained.


Defences

State whether there was contributory negligence. E.g.



4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jennm. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.17. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.17  31x  sold
  • (7)
  Add to cart