71522 ibgjun20e8 a level politics paper 2 government and politics of the usa and comparative politics thursday 4 june 2020 morning time allowed 2 hours materials for this paper you must have a
Written for
A/AS Level
AQA
political science
Government and politics of the USA and Comparative
All documents for this subject (2)
1
review
By: brightkid • 1 year ago
Seller
Follow
keenstar
Reviews received
Content preview
A-level
POLITICS
Paper 2 Government and politics of the USA and Comparative Politics
Thursday 4 June 2020 Morning Time allowed: 2 hours
Materials
For this paper you must have:
an AQA 12-page answer book.
Instructions
Use black ink or black ball-point pen.
Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is 7152/2.
Answer all questions from Section A and Section B.
Answer either Question 5 or Question 6 from Section C.
Do all rough work in your answer book. Cross through any work you do not want to be marked.
If you use more than one answer book, check that you have written the information required on
each book.
Information
The marks for questions are shown in brackets.
The maximum mark for this paper is 77.
IB/G/Jun20/E8 7152/2
, 2
Section A – US Government, politics and comparative theory
Answer questions 1, 2 and 3.
0 1 Explain and analyse three roles performed by US congressional committees.
[9 marks]
0 2 Explain and analyse three ways in which the US political system encourages
pressure group activity.
[9 marks]
0 3 Explain and analyse three ways that rational theory could be used to explain
voting behaviour in the US and UK.
[9 marks]
IB/G/Jun20/7152/2
, 3
Section B – Extract Question
Read the extracts below and answer question 4 that follows.
Is the Supreme Court a politicised institution?
The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics.
Congressional Research Service Report, June 2018 (a report prepared for members of
Congress) on the Supreme Court Appointment Process.
Each appointment is of consequence because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court
exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Under the US Constitution,
Justices on the Supreme Court receive what can amount to lifetime appointments which, by
constitutional design, helps ensure the Court’s independence from the President and Congress.
The Senate through its “Advice and Consent” function acts as a safeguard on the President’s
judgement. Closely related to the expectation that a Supreme Court nominee will have excellent
professional qualifications are the ideals of integrity and impartiality in a nominee. Accordingly,
Presidents will often cite such qualities, as President Obama did when announcing his nomination
of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Court, noting both her “mastery of the law” and “a commitment to
impartial justice”.
Extract from Congressional Research Service Report, June 2018
Who are the Federalist Society? How a group of conservative law students have come to
dominate the judicial nomination process, by Sophie McBain, North American
correspondent for the New Statesman (a centre-left UK political magazine), September
2018.
Brett Kavanaugh, the newest Supreme Court Justice, is one of five of the nine Supreme Court
justices who are members of the Federalist Society. The Society is made up of lawyers who
promote a strict constructionist view of the US Constitution. Its first advisers were Robert Bork and
Antonin Scalia who were nominated by President Reagan. In 2018 the Trump administration
asked the Society to draw up a list of potential Supreme Court nominees for the president’s
consideration, which included Kavanaugh. Steven Teles, the author of Rise of the Conservative
Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law has argued Trump effectively gave the task of
filling the vacancy to the Federalist Society. Teles says that ‘it used to be that Senators played an
important role in judicial appointments’ but by doing so Trump could be sure the Federalist Society
would put forward people who appeal to his social conservative base.
Extract from www.newstatesman.com
0 4 Analyse, evaluate and compare the different arguments in the above extracts regarding
the extent to which the US Supreme Court is a politicised institution.
[25 marks]
Turn over for the next question
IB/G/Jun20/7152/2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller keenstar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
