100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary HEP4211 Changing Health Behaviour $4.31   Add to cart

Summary

Summary HEP4211 Changing Health Behaviour

2 reviews
 372 views  16 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of lectures in course HEP4211 Changing Health Behaviour. With examples and explanations in simple language

Last document update: 9 year ago

Preview 2 out of 13  pages

  • October 22, 2015
  • October 22, 2015
  • 13
  • 2015/2016
  • Summary

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: miloujanssen2 • 7 year ago

Translated by Google

Extensive and clear!

review-writer-avatar

By: rylanasmulders • 8 year ago

Great overview of the entire course, however it did not include description of the models/theories just the names with some exceptions. Helped me out a lot

avatar-seller
HEP4211 Changing Health Behaviour: summary of (mini)
lectures

Attitude
Attitude is an important determinant of behaviour, which is used in many
theories (Theory of Planned Behaviour, I-Change Model, Reasoned Action
Approach etc.). Several strategies can be used to change attitude.

Gain vs loss framing
Framing: several forms of framing can be distinguished:
- Risky choice framing: subjects are presented with two options in a forced
choice task. The two options are typically gambles which can be described in
terms of proportions and probabilities of gains or losses. Usually, one of these
options is a sure thing (in which an intermediate outcome is specified as
certain), while the other is a risky gamble (in which extreme good and bad
values are both assigned non-zero probabilities). The gamble and sure thing
are both described either in terms of gain outcomes and probabilities or else
in terms of equivalent loss outcomes and probabilities.
- Attribute framing: A single attribute of a single object is described in terms
of either a positively valued proportion or an equivalent negatively valued
proportion. The subject is then required to provide some evaluation of the
object thus described. Objects described in terms of a positively valued
proportion are generally evaluated more favorably than objects described in
terms of the corresponding negatively valued proportion.
- Goal framing: the goals of an action or behaviour is framed
o Gain framing  the benefits of engaging in a healthy behaviour. Focus
is on (1) good things that will happen and (2) bad things that will not
happen
o Loss framing  the costs of failing to engage in a healthy behaviour.
Focus is on (1) bad things that will happen and (2) good things that will
not happen.
- Both promote the same outcome: healthy behaviour

When to use which type of framing?
Depends on:
- The behaviour: according to the message framing theory (Rothman):
o Preventative health behaviour  gain, low risk option (sunscreen)
o Detection health behaviours  loss frame, risky option (cancer
screening)
- Risk implications: the effectiveness of framed messaged hinges on how the
individual thinks and feels about the behaviour and not the behaviour type
per se  attitude concerning the behaviour, uncertainty about the outcome
of the behaviour will make the behaviour more risky.
- Dispositional factors: the effectiveness of framed messages hinges on
individual’s tendency to orient his or her behaviour toward favourable or
unfavourable outcomes  if you are more likely to focus on the positive of
negative things that will happen once you perform the behaviour
- Issue involvement (how involved are you in the behaviour)  low evidence
for this though
- Perspective of orientation (promotion (gain) vs prevention (loss) , on which
one are you more focused)  low evidence
- Self-efficacy  high SE (gain) vs low SE (loss)  low evidence

, Affective vs cognitive arguments
Attitude consists of a cognitive part and an affective part:
Cognitive: perception you have on a certain behaviour  unhealthy, safe, bad 
instrumental beliefs
Affective: affective or emotional beliefs  feel better, unpleasant, fear,
pleasant, happy, stressful  affective beliefs

These constructs are used in many theories (TPB, ICM, RAA) and can be
measured separately. Because there is a difference between cognitive and
affective attitudes, both types of arguments should be used to change this
attitude

Which arguments to use?
Depends on:
- The level of need for cognition/affect  personal
o Need for cognition (cognitive arguments): tendency for an individual
to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activity
o Need for affect (Affective arguments): tendency for an individual to
see emotions as desirable and feel a need to pursue them
- Attitudinal base  how do you form your attitude, based on cognitive or
affective beliefs?  personal.
o Matching: (attitudinal base = cognitive  cognitive arguments).
o Mismatching: (attitudinal base = cognitive  affective arguments)
 there is evidence for both, depends on how you measure it
 Meta-bases: you ask the person  self-assessment of attitude
base.
 Matching the meta base leads to higher levels of appreciation
 Structural bases: statistical story, you don’t ask the person directly
but you measure it objectively  objective assessment of attitude
base
 Mismatching the structural base leads to attitude change

Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion
ELM: how arguments are processed by a person
Dual model: two routes to persuasion
1) Central route: involves careful consideration of the issue-relevant
information relating to the attitude object  if you like to think about all
the options and the pro's and the cons
2) Peripheral routes: reliance on simple cues available in the persuasion
context as well as mental short-cuts called heuristics  if you are not likely
to elaborate on things for a longer time, you rely on simple cues (someone
tells you, you see it somewhere etc.)
 it is a continuum, you can switch between the two

Which route to take:
Depends on:
- Motivation: are you motivated to elaborate (content interest)
- Ability: are in a position to elaborate? (time, intelligence, peace of mind)
Central route:
- High motivation and high ability
- Arguments content and relevance is important
- Results: careful consideration of the message and stable attitude change

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MiMaas. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.31. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.31  16x  sold
  • (2)
  Add to cart