100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Electoral Systems Essay Plans $4.54   Add to cart

Other

Electoral Systems Essay Plans

 239 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Two essay plans which can be used for a wide range of essay questions for the electoral systems portion of Paper 1 Edexcel Politics. It has great examples and points about the pros and cons of each electoral system (i.e. FPTP, AMS, STV, and Supplementary Vote)

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • May 28, 2022
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Evaluate the claim that the advantages of FPTP outweigh the disadvantages


Paragraph 1: Effectiveness in creating a strong stable government


Agree Disagree

- FPTP usually creates a single clear winner - It has not always been able to produce
to form a majority government, with a clear strong and stable governments
mandate to govern
Eg. Coalition in 2010 and Confidence and
Eg. Conservative Party won a commanding Supply Agreement in 2017
majority of 80 seats (landslide victory) = to
‘get Brexit done’



Paragraph 2: Constituency-MP bond vs Unfair


Agree Disagree

- One single representative for each - The overall outcome is not proportional or
constituency means that there is a close fair
MP-constituency bond
- Some parties win more seats than their
Eg. In 2019 Jess Phillips MP stood outside overall majority warrants while others win
a school in her Birmingham Yardley fewer than they deserve
constituency to defend teachers who taught
primary school children about LGBTQIA+ Eg. LibDems won almost 12% of the votes
relationships in 2019 but only 2% of the seats

Eg. Conservative won 365 seats with only
43.6% on the vote

- Although this is relatively high for FPTP,
the fact that the Conservatives have such a
high majority yet they did not even have
50% of the votes, suggests it is very
undemocratic



Paragraph 3: Extremist Parties


Agree Disagree

- It helps prevent ‘extremist’ parties from - It prevents new parties breaking into the
breaking into the system system and so produces political ‘inertia’

Eg. BNP received over half a million votes Eg. UKIP won broad support across the
in the 2010 general election yet did not win country in 2015 with almost 4 million votes,
a seat yet they only won one seat

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller frankietgood. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.54. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.54
  • (0)
  Add to cart