Summary AQA A Level Philosophy - Metaphysics of God A* Notes (Full topic)
43 views 1 purchase
Course
Metaphysics of God (7172)
Institution
AQA
Book
Philosophy for A Level
Topic summary / notes on the metaphysics of God section of AQA A Level Philosophy paper 2. These notes were made according to the layout of the specification and were largely helpful as part of my studies for which I received an A* in 2021.
*** Disclaimer: This document does not include the sectio...
metaphysics of
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE SECTION 3.3.1 ‘THE CONCEPT AND NATURE
OF GOD’.
Overview:
3.3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
Ontological arguments:
o 3 ontological arguments: Anselm, Descartes, and Malcolm.
o 3 issues with ontological arguments: Gaunilo’s perfect island, empiricist
objections to a priori arguments for existence, Kant’s objection based on
existence not being a predicate.
Teleological/design arguments:
o 3 teleological arguments: Design argument from analogy (Hume), Paley’s
design argument from spatial order, and Swinburne’s design argument
from temporal order.
o 4 issues with teleological/design arguments: Hume on his argument from
analogy, spatial disorder, fails because an argument from a unique case,
and whether God is the best or only explanation.
Cosmological arguments:
o 6 cosmological arguments: Kalam (temporal causation), Aquinas 1st way
(motion), Aquinas 2nd way (atemporal causation), Aquinas 3rd way
(contingency), Descartes (causation based on his continuing existence),
Leibniz (contingency based on principle of sufficient reason).
o 4 issues with cosmological arguments: possibility of infinite series, Hume
on the ‘causal principle’, Russell’s fallacy of composition, impossibility of a
necessary being (Hume and Russell).
Problem of evil on whether God’s attributes can be reconciled with the
existence of evil: difference between moral and natural evil.
o 2 arguments for the problem of evil: The logical problem of evil, and the
evidential problem of evil.
o 2 issues with the problem of evil: Plantinga’s free will defence, and Hick’s
soul making (Irenean) theodicy.
3.3.3 Religious language
The distinction between cognitivism and non-cognitivism about religious
language.
The empiricist/logical positivist challenges to the status of metaphysical (here,
religious) language: the verification principle and verification/falsification (Ayer).
o Hick’s response to Ayer (eschatological verification) and issues arising from
that response.
Further responses (the university debate): Flew on falsification (the gardener),
Mitchell’s response to Flew (the partisan), and Hare’s response to Flew (bliks and
the lunatic) – and issues with these three responses.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller michael6. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $20.06. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
