Essay
model comparison essay Bowlby's monotropic theory and learning theory of attachment
- Course
- Institution
model comparison 8/8 marked by teacher, comparing Bowlby's monotropic theory and the learning theory of attachment
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
sarajnb11
Content preview
Outline and evaluate Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment. Compare with the learningtheory of attachment in your answer. (8 marks)
Bowlby’s monotropic theory describes attachment as adaptive and innate, necessary for
evolutionary survival. The idea of monotropy is that an infant must create a primary
attachment to one person (usually the mother) that is more important than all other
attachments. This must be done within the critical period (2 years), and any time spent away
from mother within this period would have a detrimental effect on the child’s development
(law of accumulated separation). He also argued that the first attachment with mum created
the internal working model, a kind of schema or mental template for what the child expects
all future relationships to be like. A poor attachment with mum could lead to a negative
internal working model and poor relationships in later life (law of continuity).
Finally, Bowlby argued the importance of social releasers, cues such as smiling or laughing
that trigger communication between mum and baby, are necessary for creating a strong
attachment. This opposes the learning theory of attachment, which suggests is only the
association through classical and operant conditioning of mum and milk that creates the
attachment (cupboard love), and the sensitivity of response from mum has no impact on
attachment. Research into infant-caregiver interactions supports Bowlby’s theory over the
learning theory as it emphasises the importance of quick sensitive responses to infants’
needs in creating a strong attachment.
The learning theory is also considered more reductionist than Bowlby’s theory as it reduces
the complex behaviour of attachment into simple stimulus-response learning. It is
environmentally reductionist as it only considers the environmental factors of feeding in
forming an attachment. Bowlby’s theory considers both biological factors, as he considers
attachment to be innate, as well as environmental factors such as the importance of social
releasers. Bowlby’s theory better explains not only how attachments are formed, but also
how the quality of attachment is achieved.
8/8
Other evaluation points for 16 marker
Animal studies to support bowlby and refute learning theory
Nature/ nurture + explanatory power
Determinism for both
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sarajnb11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.14. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
76799 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now