Samenvatting studies Sociale Psychologie Deel 1 (P0M05a)
40 views 0 purchase
Course
Sociale Psychologie Deel 1 (P0M05A)
Institution
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Dit is een samenvatting van alle studies van sociale pscyhologie, de verdere leerstof staat hier dus niet in, enkel de studies. Ik vond het heel handig om ze op 1 plek te hebben aangezien je die best goed moet kennen. De gehele leerstof staat in het document Samenvatting sociale psychologie deel 1....
Inhoud
Studies sociale psychologie....................................................................................................................4
1. Studie van Ader en Tatum..........................................................................................................4
2. studie van Allport (1920)............................................................................................................4
3. Zajonc, Heingartner & Herman (1969)........................................................................................5
4. Schmitt, Gilovich, Goore & Joseph(1986)....................................................................................5
5. Thomas, Skitka, Christen en Jurgena (2002)...............................................................................6
6. Pilootstudie ~ Asch + hoofdonderzoek.......................................................................................7
7. Kleurenperceptie ~ Moscovici.....................................................................................................8
8. Replicatie taak ~ Milgram...........................................................................................................9
9. Basisparadigma ~ Milgram..........................................................................................................9
10. Vooronderzoeken ~ Milgram..................................................................................................10
11. Schockgenerator ~ Milgram....................................................................................................10
12. De officiële Milgramstudies....................................................................................................10
13. Vriendenstudie ~ Milgram......................................................................................................13
14. Replicatie van Milgram studie ~ Meeuw en Raaijmakers (1986)............................................13
15. Sociale identiteit (Reicher en Haslam, 2011)..........................................................................13
16. Affectieve Priming Test (Fazio, Jackson, Dunton & Williams, 1995)........................................14
17. Ongunstige houding verdwijnt: Olson & Fazio (2006, Studie 2)..............................................14
18. Studie ~ Baeyens, Eelen & Van den Bergh (1990)...................................................................15
19. Experiment 1 ~ Zajonc (1968).................................................................................................15
20. Experiment 2 ~ Zajonc............................................................................................................15
21. Experiment 3 ~ Zajonc............................................................................................................16
22. Mere exposure en kunst ~ Cutting (2003)...............................................................................16
23. Mere exposure en eten ~ Pliner (1982)..................................................................................17
24. Moreland en Beach (1992).....................................................................................................17
25. Harmon-Jones & Allen (2001).................................................................................................17
26. Studie 1 ~ Begg & Armour (1991)...........................................................................................18
27. Festingen en Carlsmith (1959)................................................................................................18
28. Hein, Grumm & Fingerle (2011)..............................................................................................19
30. Duncan (1976)........................................................................................................................20
31. Dunning & Sherman (1997)....................................................................................................20
32. Feldman Barrett & Bliss-Moreau (2009, Exp. 1)......................................................................21
33. Arbuckle & Williams (2003)....................................................................................................21
34. Biernat, Manis en Nelson (1991, exp 2)..................................................................................22
,35. Hebl e.a. (2002).......................................................................................................................23
36. Gabriel & Banse (2006)...........................................................................................................23
37. Bargh, Chen & Burrows (1996)...............................................................................................24
38. Robinson, Johnson & Shields (1998).......................................................................................24
39. Shih, Pittinksy & Ambady (1999).............................................................................................25
40. Castelli et al. (2009)................................................................................................................25
41. Operante conditionering en agressie? Berkowitz & Frodi (1977):..........................................26
42. Studie waar we dat zien voorkomen: Bushman (2002)..........................................................27
43. Meer agressie na succes dan na mislukking? ~ Muller, Bushman, Subra, & Ceaux (2012,
Studie 2).......................................................................................................................................28
44. studie ~ Zechmeister et al. (2004)..........................................................................................29
45. Petersen et al. (2002)..............................................................................................................29
46. Carlsmith et al. (2008, exp. 3).................................................................................................30
47. Provocatie en waargenomen ernst van de schade: Ames & Fiske (2013, Study 5).................31
48. Donnerstein & Wilson (1976, exp.2).......................................................................................31
49. Warburton et al. (2005)..........................................................................................................32
50. Weinstein et al. (2011, exp. 2)................................................................................................33
51. DAN: vervolgstudie.................................................................................................................33
52. Gewelddadige computerspellen ~ Anderson & Dill (2000, studie 2)......................................34
53. Greitemeyer (2014)................................................................................................................34
54. Hasan, Begue, Scharkow en Bushman (2013).........................................................................35
55. Newman & Cain, 2014 (exp. 1)...............................................................................................36
56. Newman & Cain, 2014 (exp. 4)...............................................................................................37
57. Dunn, Aknin, & Norton (2008):...............................................................................................38
58. Aknin, Hamlin & Dunn, 2012...................................................................................................38
59. Darley en Latané (1968)..........................................................................................................38
60. Darley en Latané (1968)..........................................................................................................40
61. Latané & Rodin (1969)............................................................................................................40
62. Blair, Thompson en Wuensch (2005)......................................................................................41
63. Chekroun & Brauer (2002)......................................................................................................41
64. Alicke, Zell & Bloom (2010).....................................................................................................42
65. Gilbert, Giesler, & Morris (1995, exp. 1).................................................................................42
66. Gilbert, Giesler, & Morris (1995, exp. 2).................................................................................43
67. Schachter & Singer (1962)......................................................................................................43
68. Marshall en Zimbardo (1979)..................................................................................................44
69. studie van Boyce, Brown en Moore (2010).............................................................................44
,70. Range et al. (2008)..................................................................................................................45
, Studies sociale psychologie
1. Studie van Ader en Tatum
Situatie:
Studenten (2 x 12) komen naar labo
Ze krijgen electrodes aan kuit
Gedurende 1u30 uur om 10 sec. shock (1/2 sec)
Binnen bereik: plankje met drukknop
Knop induwen: shock 10sec uitgesteld
A.V.: Tijd nodig voor oplossing. Criterium: tijd tot aan eerste interval van 5
min waar max. 1 shock per minuut werd doorgelaten
O.V.: Sociale situatie: Alleen vs. 2e student aanwezig
Zelfde shocks, deze student kan niet bij knop, mogen niet
praten
NOOT: 5 (van de 24) deelnemers lopen weg
2. studie van Allport (1920)
Ppn: 15 Master- en doctoraatstudenten doen vrije associatietaken
O.V.: sociale situatie: alleen vs. samen met 4 andere deelnemers
o Within subjects design: elke deelnemer 2x alleen, 2x samen
o Volgorde en tijd tussen sessies gevarieerd
A.V.: aantal woorden genoteerd binnen tijdslimiet
Resultaten:
o Alleenconditie: gemiddeld 60.3 associaties
o Sociale conditie: gemiddeld 63.6 associaties
Wat werd precies bevorderd? Bedenken van associaties of snelheid van het schrijven?
experiment 3:
Taak in gedachten doen en enkel het vierde woord waar ze aan dachten moesten noteren
(dus 4,8,12, etc..)
het aantal woorden minder beperkt door hoe snel ze schreven
Resultaten:
o Alleenconditie: gemiddeld 112.8 associaties
o Sociale conditie: gemiddeld 116 associaties
Veklaring verschillende effecten:
- niet in termen van erg complexe cognitieve processen
- in termen van cultuur en tijdsgeest
ook aangetoond bij dieren
voorbeelden:
- Sociale inhibitie bij parkieten: donker doolhof, minder snel naar naar lichte, vertrouwde
omgeving wanneer ze met 2 waren vergeleken met wanneer ze alleen zaten)
studie van Allee en Masure coactief maar ook hier trad inhibitie op
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lisetolo123. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.03. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
