100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Class notes on Ethics (W_BA_PNEU) $3.77   Add to cart

Class notes

Class notes on Ethics (W_BA_PNEU)

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Detailed notes on the foundations of ethics. Includes normative ethics, trolleyology, kantian deontology and utilitarianism. Looks at hypothetical ethical scenarios to further explore the foundations of ethics.

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • June 21, 2022
  • 8
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Dr. phil robichaud & dr. nina groot
  • Lecture 3
avatar-seller
The Foundations of Ethics

What is ethics?
There are three main areas of philosophical ethics:
1. Normative ethics
a. What are the correct general moral principles?
b. When can we say that something has moral value?
2. Applied ethics
a. What should we do in this specific, real-life situation?
3. Metaethics
a. What is the nature of moral facts? (metaphysics)
b. How can we know moral facts? (epistemology)
c. When are we morally praise-blameworthy? (Moral
psychology)

There are two kinds of moral concepts:
1. Deontic concepts (right and wrong)
2. Value concepts (good and bad)
We will be focusing on the deontic concepts.

Normative ethics
Imagine the child drowning scenario. There is a specific moral
claim: It is wrong to let the child drown. What would explain
this? Possible moral principles include:
- It is wrong to allow avoidable suffering.
- It is wrong to promote selfish interests at the cost of
someone’s life.
Formula: Moral principles + Facts = Moral claims
- It is wrong to allow avoidable suffering (normative claim)
- By letting the child drown, you are allowing avoidable
suffering (descriptive claim)
- Therefore, it is wrong to let the child drown (logically
derived normative claim).

The goal of normative ethics is to discover general moral
principles. These are principles that give verdicts in all possible
cases. Normative ethics is used to figure out what it is we
should actually do in particular cases. Moral reasoning thus
must involve both normative claims and descriptive claims in
order to be logically derived.

, Trolleyology
Thomson proposed the ‘trolley problem’. In her paper, she had
a goal of showing how you can utilise thought experiments, like
the trolley problem, in order to help us inform our moral
theorising. Using these artificial thought experiments allow you
to focus on the morally relevant features of the situation, away
from the chaos of a real-life situation.

Non-consequentialism
Thomson adopts a type of moral theory called non-
consequentialism: where two actions with exactly the same
consequences can differ morally. There is something about the
action, not the consequence, that makes them morally differ.
An example of the non-consequentialist theory is the Doctrine
of Doing and Allowing, which says that ‘killing is always worse
than letting die’, even if the consequences are the same.
Read - https://canvas.vu.nl/courses/57089/files/folder/Course
%20Literature/Week%203?preview=4326825

Trolley problem: 1 person on one track vs 5 people on the other
track.

Not switching tracks = let 5 die
Switch = kill 1

Letting 5 die violates a positive duty to save lives.
Killing violates a negative duty to refrain from killing.

Generally, negative duties are more stringent than positive.
Thus, the duty to refrain from killing is stronger than the duty
to save people’s lives.

However, Thomson believes that it is permissible to kill one in
order to save 5 lives in the trolley problem. Switching is
therefore intuitively permissible. Intuition thus plays a role in
morality. If this is the case, the explanation ‘killing is worse
than letting die’ is inapplicable. It becomes a moral puzzle.
Thomson’s paper is about trying to find the moral explanation
for the different scenarios.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emilyknight. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.77. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.77
  • (0)
  Add to cart