100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MRL3701 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1 - WITH DETAILED BIBLIOGRAPHY $28.37   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

MRL3701 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1 - WITH DETAILED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 review
 152 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

MRL3701 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1 - WITH DETAILED BIBLIOGRAPHY Question 1 1.1 Identify the problem / issue that was faced by the court in Magnum Financial Holdings (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) v Summerly and another NNO 1984 (1) SA 160 (W) and give reasons why the court in thi...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 19  pages

  • June 22, 2022
  • 19
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: noxville • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Question 1


1.1 Identify the problem / issue that was faced by the court in Magnum Financial
Holdings (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) v Summerly and another NNO 1984 (1) SA
160 (W) and give reasons why the court in this case was satisfied that the
applicants had made out a case for the relief sought. (5)


Magnum Financial Holdings


FACTS: applicant made out a case for the relief sought. (The urgent grant of a
provisional sequestration order) There had been sufficient service of the papers on the
trustee of the trust. (Trustee in terms of the law of trusts, who administers the trust
property for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries, not a trustee in terms of insolvency
law). The one provisional liquidator of the applicant company had locus standi to apply.
The applicant company had a claim against the trust company for approximately
R1.6million, which was due and payable. An act of insolvency in terms of S8 (g) had
been committed and trust estate was sequestrated urgently. And necessary security
bond had been lodged and annexed to the court papers.


PROBLEM: whether a trust could, at law, be sequestrated.


FINDING: No South African case has dealt with the question in terms of S9 (1) and
the definition of a debtor. The court relied on Ex Parte Milton, which found that a trust
fell within the meaning of a debtor. Although a trustee could borrow money and as a
property owner, be liable for rates and taxes – the creditors would be paid ONLY from
the trusts property (could not sequestrate the estate of donor of trust property,
beneficiaries or the trustee).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $28.37. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$28.37  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart