LCP4804 PORTFOLIO EXAM MEMO.
Advance Indigenous Law LCP4804
Critically discuss the differences between living customary law and official customary
law.
[30]
Official Customary Law
In general, the official customary law reflects state interests and is part of state law. The
official version o...
,QUESTION 1
Critically discuss the differences between living customary law and official customary
law.
[30]
Official Customary Law
In general, the official customary law reflects state interests and is part of state law. The
official version of customary law is found in statutes, law reports, the South African Law
Reform Commission reports, text books, university lectures and other public documents.
According to Ndima, the official version of customary law depends on alien values for
validity. Mogoro J, in Du Plessis v De Klerk 1, points out that customary law "has lamentably
been marginalised and allowed to degenerate into a vitrified set of norms alienated from its
roots in the community". Costa puts it thus:Customary law as it stands is corrupted,
inauthentic and lacking authority. It is a foreign imposition, a stranger in Africa.2
In Fosi v Road Accident Fund,3 the court put it as follows:
Indigenous African customary law has occupied an unfortunate position in the legal history of
our country. The fact is that it was hardly recognized by the law-makers and was accordingly
scarcely applied in the South African courts. It enjoyed the status of being known that it
existed and its continued existence was merely tolerated as a necessary evil.
In Sigcau v Sigcau, 4 the Appellate Division held that the individual person was the owner of
the royal family home and not merely the controller of the property. Ndima5 puts it thus:
⬇️⬇️⬇️
️
MEMO CONTINUES ON THE NEXT PAGE……️
1Van Niekerk 2001 CILSA 480.
2 Costa 1998 SAJHR 525, 534.
3 Fosi v Road Accident Fund 2008 3 SA 560 (CPD) 567.
4 Sigcau v Sigcau 1944 AD 67 79.
5 Ndima 2007 Speculum Juris 83-84.
, However, the learned Chief Justice refused to vacate his common law comfort zone,
although he was dealing with an African customary law problem. He continued to use the
same institution, which his experience of common law made him use, to describe the rights
of the defendant, in an African matter. By doing this he unwittingly committed an unforgivable
comparative law mistake, namely, looking at foreign law (African customary law) with the
eyes of his own system (common law).
Living Customary Law
6
Living customary law is the "law actually observed by African communities".
It is the
unwritten law that is passed on from generation to generation and is part of the culture and
tradition of the community. 7 It evolves as the circumstances of society change. 8
However, a
change of legislation, in particular, and written law, in general, often if not always requires
legislative intervention. Ndima9 puts it as follows:
When it comes to the pervasive problem of developing African customary law, the judiciary
faces the additional challenge of determining the living version of customary law for the
community concerned. One of the injustices of the past, which our constitutional interpreters
must reject in striving to heal our historical divisions, is the distortion caused to African law
by the application of the interpretive technique of repugnancy. This method removed the
philosophical underpinnings (which the colonial officials perceived to be in conflict with
Western morality) from African customary law.
The development of the law is not only a catholic but is also an age-old world- wide
phenomenon. For instance, according to Hahlo,10 western European marriage law developed
in three stages. During the first stage, marriage was a private matter between spouses and
their families. During the second stage, marriage was under the jurisdiction of the church.
During the last stage, marriage passed under the control of the state. The court, in Rolfes,
Nebel and Co v Zweigenhaft,11 said:
6 Mabena v Letsoalo 1998 2 SA 1068 (T) 1074.
7 Du Plessis Introduction to Law 67.
8 Koyana Customary Law 157.
9 Ndima 2007 Speculum Juris 81-82.
10 Hahlo Law of Husband and Wife 1.
11 Rolfes, Nebel and Co v Zweigenhaft 1903 TS 185 206.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SOLUTIONS2024. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.20. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
