Summary

Statutory Interpretation - Summary Unit 1 LAW01 - Law Making and the Legal System

0 purchase

Course
Unit 1 LAW01 - Law Making and the Legal System

Institution
AQA

Summary of AQA A level Law statutory interpretation with key case studies and exam question guidance. A good aid for revision and practice exam papers. Summarises the topic clearly so is easy to understand.

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6 pages

View example

Uploaded on July 1, 2022
Number of pages 6
Written in 2021/2022
Type Summary

english
legal
system
nature
law
making
statutory
interpretation
aqa
a level
revision
exam guidance
summary
notes

Study Level
A/AS Level
Examinator
AQA
Subject
Law
Unit
Unit 1 LAW01 - Law Making and the Legal System

$10.36

Also available in package deal from $20.08

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Also available in package deal (1)

Unit 1 - Nature of Law and The English Legal System AQA A level Law study notes

$ 62.14 $ 20.08 6 items

1. Summary - Statutory interpretation - summary unit 1 law01 - law making and the legal system
2. Summary - Judicial precedent summary unit 1 law01 - law making and the legal system
3. Summary - Lay people summary unit 1 law01 - law making and the legal system
4. Summary - The judiciary summary unit 1 law01 - law making and the legal system
5. Summary - Solicitors and barristers summary unit 1 law01 - law making and the legal system
6. Summary - Law and morality summary unit 1 law01 - law making and the legal system
Show more

Statutory Interpretation

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION:

The Literal Rule:
Gives all the words in a statute their ordinary and natural meaning. Under this rule, the
literal meaning must be followed, even if the result is absurd.
Lord Esher stated in R v City of London Court Judge: 'If the words of an Act are clear, you
must follow them, even though they lead to a manifest absurdity.

Cases illustrating the Literal Rule:

Whitley v Chapell

 Charged under a section making it an offence to impersonate “any person entitled to
vote”
 D pretended to be a person whose name was on the voting list who had died
 Court held that D was not guilty since a dead person is not, in the literal meaning of
the words, 'entitled to vote'
 Using the literal rule made the law absurd

London & North-eastern Railway Company v Berriman

 A railway worker was killed whilst doing maintenance work, oiling parts along a train
line.
 Widow tries to claim compensation because there hadn't been a look-outman
provided by the railway company in accordance with regulation under the Fatal
Accidents Act.
 This Act stated that a look-out should be provided for men working on or near the
railway line 'for the purposes of relaying or repairing it'
 The court took the words 'relaying and repairing' in their literal meaning and said
maintenance was being carried out not wither of the former.
 The claim failed and the use of the rule lead to a harsh or unjust decision

Fisher v Bell

 The Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 S1(1)
o 'Any person who manufactures, sells or hires or offers for sale or hire or lends
or gives to any other person-(a) any knife which has a blade which opens
automatically by hand pressure [...] known as a 'flick knife'...shall be guilty of
an offence'
 D was a shopkeeper who displayed a flick knife with a price in his shop window but
hadn't actually sold any
 Charged under S1 (1); Court had to decide if guilty of offering knife for sale
 Technical legal meaning of 'offers for sale', under which putting an article in a shop
window isn't an offer to sell.

, R v Secretary of state - for the home department (2006) (on the application of Haw)
 The courts of appeal refused to apply a literal approach to a new piece of legislation
as they felt it would not reflect the intention of parliament.

The Golden Rule:
If the literal rule provides an absurd result that parliament could not have intended, then
and only then the judge can substitute reasonable meaning in light of the statute as a
whole.

Cases illustrating the Golden Rule:

R V Allen - 2 meanings of the word 'marry'

 S.57 Offences Against a Person Act (1861) made it an offence to marry whilst one
original spouse was still alive and there had been no divorce.
 'Marry' can have 2 meanings: legally married or go through a ceremony of marriage.
 Allen had 'married' a 2nd time whilst legally married to his 1st wife. The court
followed the 2nd meaning of the word because the 1st meaning implied, no one
could be guilty of the offence.

Adler v George

 Official Secrets Act 1970 an offence to obstruct HM's Forces 'in the vicinity of a
prohibited place.
 D has obstructed HM Forces actually in the prohibited place. They argued they
weren’t guilty as the literal meaning of the Act didn't apply to anyone inside the
prohibited place - it only applied to those 'in the vicinity
 The Divisional Court found D guilty as it would be absurd if those obstructing outside
were found guilty and those inside weren't. Words should be read as being 'in or in
the vicinity of’ the prohibited place.

Madox v Storer
Sweet v Parsley
Inco Europe It v First Choice Distribution

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller libby2. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling