Judicial Precedent Summary Unit 1 LAW01 - Law Making and the Legal System
13 views 0 purchase
Course
Unit 1 LAW01 - Law Making and the Legal System
Institution
AQA
Summary of AQA A level Law Judicial Precedent with key case studies and exam question guidance. A good aid for revision and practice exam papers. Summarises the topic clearly so is easy to understand.
Judicial Precedent:
Judicial precedent refers to the source of law where past decisions of the judges create law
for future judges to follow, also known as case law.
Stare Decisis = Stand by what has been decided
Obiter Dicta = other things said and done
The court hierarchy:
Supreme Court – makes original precedent
Court of Appeal - makes original precedent
High Court – must follow the original precedent
Crown Court/ County court - must follow the original precedent
Magistrates/ Tribunals - must follow the original precedent
Main features of judicial precedent:
Persuasive precedent
Original precedent
Persuasive precedent: judgements do not have to be followed but could provide good law
for judges to follow, not binding:
Courts lower in the hierarchy
Decisions of the privy council
Statements made obiter dicta
A dissenting judgement
Decisions of other common law jurisdictions
Original precedent: areas of law originating entirely from judicial precedent, law made by
judges
Case examples:
RvR
Donoghue v Stevenson
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
Ways of avoiding precedents:
, 1. Overrule - Higher courts can overrule lower courts
Candler v Crane Christmas & co, Hedley Byrne v Heller & Partners
2. Reverse - On appeal, a higher court may change the decision of a lower court
Re Pinochet
3. Distinguish - Where a lower court is able to point to material differences that justify
the application of different principles
Balfour v Balfour, Merritt v Merritt
Exceptions:
Court of Appeal is bound by the decisions of the supreme court or HOL, but also its own
previous decisions except in conditions laid down in Young v Bristol Aeroplane:
Where there are 2 conflicting decisions
Where a previous decision has been overturned by a later hol/supreme court
decision
Where the previous decision was wrongly decided
Practice Statement:
Supreme court + Precedent
House of Lords was bound by its own previous decisions as held in London Tramways
v LCC
Lord Chancellor issued the practice statement allowing the House of Lords to depart
from their previous decision ' where it appears right to do so'
Case examples:
Pepper v Hart
R v Shivpuri
Impact of the human rights act 1998 s.2
Requires all judges to consider the case law of the European court of human rights. This
creates a new source of case law.
Case example:
Vinter v UK - Article 3 rights breached due to sentence of 'whole life order'
Advantages + Disadvantages of Judicial Precedent:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller libby2. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.95. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
