100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Political developments 1951-64 notes and essay plans DETAILED $8.94   Add to cart

Other

Political developments 1951-64 notes and essay plans DETAILED

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

AQA A level history Challenge and transformation: Britain, c1851–1964 Everything from specification detailed with analysis: Political developments: Conservative dominance from 1951 and political consensus; division within the Labour Party; Conservatism and the Establishment; Labour victory in ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • July 5, 2022
  • 10
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Political developments:

 Conservative dominance from 1951- why, what did they achieve
 political consensus- what and why
 division within the Labour Party;
 Conservatism and the Establishment;
 Labour victory in 1964, why did cons fall

 ‘To what extent was there a political consensus between the two main political parties in the
years 1945 to 1964?’ IN ESSAY PLAANNING BOOKLET
 ‘The dominance of the Conservatives, in the years 1951 to 1964, was due to divisions within
the Labour Party.’ Assess the validity of this view.
 ‘The Conservative defeat in 1964 was an indication of the people’s rejection of the
dominance of the Establishment in the post-war era.’ Assess the validity of this view.
 ‘In the years 1945 to 1964, the Conservatives had strong, effective leaders; whereas
labour’s leaders were weak and ineffective’ assess the validity of this view


1950 election called by Atlee

 Labour won 315 seats but the Conservatives gained ground with 298 seats, a lead of just 17
seats, a narrow majority.
 Lost seats due to Redistribution of Seats Act 1949 which re-defined constituency boundaries,
affecting previously Labour ‘safe-seats’ and bc lost support from mc
 In 1950, UK got involved in war in Korea as part of UN force to ‘contain’ communism
 Needed to re-arm, leads to another ‘austerity’ budget as economy begins to suffer
 Leads to fees introduced for some NHS services – dentistry and prescriptions
 This in turn leads to splits in Labour – Aneurin Bevan resigns in protest, Attlee unable to keep
the party together

1951

 Labour- 40% of votes- rack up votes in safe seats “wasted votes”
 Tory vision= 13 yrs of tory power, reduced power of the state associated w +ve connotations
as public tired of rationing
 Consumer boom
 Many w/c stay loyal to labour bc tangible benefits of welfare state but m/c swing away as
now associate socialism w reduced living standards, disliked rationing, high taxation, less
clear how they benefitted 45-51



Why did the Conservative Party win the 1951 General Election? And dominate?

Labour weaknesses Economic context-economic boom – end of austerity, consumerism
and rising living standards
Limited success of some of Labour's reforms – NHS
faced opposition and was much more expensive than Domestic – Britain owed £4bn in loans to USA end of WW2.
initially expected - costs doubled between 1948-51 and Rationing of meats, eggs, sugar etc. continued and even expanded
led to Chancellor Gaitskell introducing prescription after the war - bread rationed from 1946-48. 1946-47 fuel crisis –
payments in ’51 budget– Bevan resigned. depleted coals stock and pressure on national grid – electric

, Strength of Labour team- exceptionally talented but supplies limited by Shinwell to 19hrs a day.
now old and stress/health problem’s take its toll-
M/C fed up of austerity and lack of luxuries and spending – black
Ernest Bevin died 1951 + Stafford Cripps
market emerged.
Divisions within Labour – between left and right about
-consumer boom key factor in con victory
spending priorities, Gaitskellans and Bevanites. Attlee
-existence of a ’feel- good factor- some affluent workers desert
couldn’t unite them. Morrison and majority wanted
labour
consolidation, Bevan and more left wingers wanted
further bold reforms and more nationalisation. Aging
cabinet and some resignations eg bevan damaged
Foreign- 1947 Convertibility crisis - Labour had to secure economic
Labour+ took Wilson w him- not many young left
support from USA in the form of Marshall Aid from 1948-50 to help
-couldn’t persuade m/c “floating votes” to defect stabilise the economy. It did help but also meant continued
austerity. Got involved in a costly Korean War and continued with
-run out of ideas by 1951, alr enacted major social
financial commitments abroad as part of NATO.
reforms- little to offer,not a vote winning machine
Economy:
-Aneurin Bevan and Hugh Gaitskell over prescription
charges in NHS – many Labour MPs supported Bevan • Conservatives came to power just as the economy was
along with trade unionists, he became political enemy recovering.
of Gaitskell who had pushed through charges as CofE.
• Men's weekly wages were rising, there was a massive
-Suez crisis was perfect opportunity to exploit, but increase in private savings and a boom in car ownership.
Gaitskell could not reign in issues in Labour and
• Harold Macmillan managed to build over his target of
Conservatives were quick to manoeuvre
300,000 houses per year as promised by the Conservative
-Couldn’t convince public with the ‘deepness’ of the government.
split
• Farmers did well financially.
-The extent of 1959 election defeat was a genuine
• Food rationing had ended.
shock and splits widened – over Britain’s nuclear
weapons programme and growing opposition to party Conservatives declared more tax cuts before the elections
leadership from trade unions.

-Links between powerful CND pressure group and left
wing of Labour turned people away

-Party conferences became political battlefields- too
busy talking to itself than the public who dc abt
dropping clause 4 when theres a consumer boom

 Clement Attlee: led Labour since 1935 - could
no longer control divisions within the party,

 Nye Bevan: left school at 13 but won a
scholarship; architect of NHS under Attlee’s
government; charismatic public speaker and
hero of Labour left; many Conservatives,
sections of national press and many in his own
party hated him. Didn’t go far enough idea

 Hugh Gaitskell, after introducing prescription

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller safiab. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.94. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76462 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.94
  • (0)
  Add to cart