nr 505 week 3 assignment research summary table reducing surgical site infections ssis with frequent hcg bathing
Written for
Chamberlain School Of Nursing
NR 505
All documents for this subject (5)
Seller
Follow
StudyConnect
Reviews received
Content preview
Running head: RESEARCH SUMMARY TABLE: REDUCING SSIs WITH CHG BATHING 1
NR 505 Week 3 Assignment: Research Summary Table: Reducing Surgical Site Infections
(SSIs) with Frequent HCG Bathing
, RESEARCH SUMMARY TABLE: REDUCING SSIs WITH CHG BATHING 2
Reducing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) with Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing
- PICO Question: Does increasing frequency of chlorhexidine baths preoperatively decrease the
incidences of surgical site infections post-operatively?
Purpose of Research Data Collection Results Strengths and
Citations Research Designs and Methods Weaknesses
Sample
- To evaluate - Meta-analysis A search of electronic Overall, 6.8% of 10 out of 16 studies had
efficacy of to systematically databases was used to patients developed No standardized
¹http://proxy.chamberlain.edu: chlorhexidine in review of 16 identify prospective SSI in HCG group instruction between
8080/login?url=http://search. preoperative to published controlled trials compared with groups
ebscohost.com/login.aspx? prospective evaluating whole- 7.2% of the other Possible group
direct=true&db=ccm&AN=
prevent surgical controlled body preoperative groups. HCG selection bias
104061324&site=ehost-live site infections clinical trials; bathing with bathing did not No evidence of
(SSIs) chlorhexidine versus significantly instructions provided
n = 17,932 placebo or no bath reduce SSI when to patients
for prevention of SSI. compared with No compliance
7,952 patients soap, placebo, or Measured. 6/16 showed
received a HCG bath, no shower or bath statistical significance in
and 9,980 patients (relative risk, 0.90; HCG and SSI reduction.
were allocated to 95% confidence
various comparator interval: 0.77-1.05,
groups P = .19).
- To evaluate the -Prospective -Data obtained from -Statistically - Treatment interruption
effectiveness of cohort study over randomized significant finding when Sage recalled
²http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:
preoperative a 4 month controlled selection in that only 7/335 products- but those units
8080/login?url=http://search.
bathing with period. for interventional patients in were censored from the
ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
chlorhexidine Intervention group of 40 patients interventional final analysis
direct=true&db=ccm&AN=
gluconate (CHG) group n = 335 undergoing surgery group had SSIs -LOS and co-morbidities
104286731&site=ehost-live
cloths for reducing Non-intervention per week for 16 postoperatively as showed declining curves
surgical site group weeks = 335. For compared to at time of abstract.
infections comparative group, 17/284 SSIs seen
- n = 284 random data in the observation
collected via EBP of group from
284 patients from previous year.
same period of (P = .01)
previous year = 284
-To evaluate - Single center -The volunteers were - There was no - small population size
effectiveness of prospective randomized to 2 significant - no comparison from
³http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:
preop frequency of conducted at an HCG, 4%, showering difference in intervention group with a
8080/login?url=http://search.
baths with CHG to academic tertiary groups (2 vs3 concentrations non-antimicrobial wash
ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
increased care medical showers), containing between 2 (P = . group
direct=true&db=ccm&AN=
concentration to center from June 60 participants each, 001) and - no screening of their
111110761&site=ehost-live
HCG on skin 1, 2014, to and 3 subgroups (no 3 (P = .001) isolates for CHG
surface to reduce September, 30, pause, 1-minute showers or resistance
bacterial counts post 2014 pause, or between the 1- and
operatively. - n= 120 2-minute pause 2-minute pauses.
before rinsing),
containing 20
participants each
Decease SSI rate by - single-center, patients analyzed; -in HCG = 20% - small sample size
⁴http://proxy.chamberlain.edu: using 4% HCG + prospective n=49 cleaned feet (9/46) -no quantitative analysis
8080/login?url=http://search. 70% alcohol to randomized trial with propyl (control) versus done on cx
ebscohost.com/login.aspx? reduce skin bacterial versus n=46 cleaned IPA = 35% (17/49) -positive cx swab and
direct=true&db=ccm&AN= loads prior to -n= 95 with isopropyl follow after skin closure clinical data not well
115146553&site=ehost-live foot/ankle surgery by HCG (P = .07) established
-heterogeneity of foot
and ankle sx and OR time
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyConnect. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
