Summary Differences between the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate EBP and The Iowa Model
24 views 0 purchase
Course
Nursing
Institution
Johns Hopkins University
The paper talks about Stetler model of research utilization aids practitioners across how findings and other essential practices are applied. It also provides the best evidence informed methods and the relationship with research includes:
a. Five phases of Stetler’s Model of Research Utilizatio...
Running Head: Stetler Model of Research Utilization & The Iowa Model of Evidence-based 1
Full Title of the Paper
Author Names
University
, Stetler Model of Research Utilization & The Iowa Model of Evidence-based practice 2
What are the differences between the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate
EBP and The Iowa Model of Evidence-based Practice to Promote Quality Care? Do
they seem to oppose or complement each other?
Stetler model of research utilization helps practitioners access how research findings
and other essential practices are applied. This model creates a formal change within the
organization by using evidence and how practitioners can use informal basis as part o
reflective practices and critical thinking (Rutter & Brown, 2019). The model correlates with
the research use as the first step with good evidence-informed practices. This model provides
the best evidence-informed method and the relationship with research use. Integration of
research use and evidence-informed practices enhance the overall research application.
Research use offers the first step of research-related actions that result in evidence-informed
training when in use in light of available supplemental evidence hence aiding in decision
making.
Stetler's Model of Research Utilization consists of five phases. Each phase is designed
to mitigate some of the human errors made in decision making, result in the use of evidence
in the context of daily practice, and facilitate critical thinking about the practical application
of research findings. Phase one is a preparation which is identifying the primary purpose of
consulting relevant related resources and evidence and recognizing the need to consider
critical contextual factors that could influence implementation; phase two is validation which
asses each source of evidence for its level of high overall operational, applicability and
credibility details with an assumption that a methodologically weak study may still provide
helpful information for additional evidence.
Phase three is comparative evaluation and decision making. It logically displays and
organizes the summarized findings from all validated sources in terms of their differences
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Killer2025. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
