100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ELIM Module Summary $7.73   Add to cart

Summary

ELIM Module Summary

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This summary details all of the relevant information needed on the english legal institutions and methods law module. All notes are grade 2:1 and above.

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • July 25, 2022
  • 15
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
English Legal Institutions and Methods

Lecture 1 - Common Law and Equity

Maxims of Equity are the rules that you have to play if you want to use equity. This is justice
or fairness. Such as coming to court with clean hands. This means that you have to come to
court ready to play fairly. These help govern the way Equity operates.
They include:
 Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy.
 Equity follows the law.
 He who comes to Equity must come with clean hands.
 Delay (laches) defeats Equity.
 Equity looks to the intent rather than the form
 Equally is equity.



Lecture 2 - Precedent

The kings judges only followed other cases that they were aware about. This is a good idea
and is known as ‘stare decisis’. This should be encouraged in the legal system.
Within the period of around 300 years, three key things happened, turning an informal
‘stare decisis’ into a formal system of ‘stare decisis’. This formalizes the entire system.

What is needed to move from ’Stare Decisis’? Following previous decisions to a formal
system of precedent?
Three key developments led to the creation of a system of precedent:
⁃ The development of printing.
⁃ Creation of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting - created a ranking for law
reports.
⁃ The Judicature Acts 1873-75 - created a fused court structure (between old common
law courts and courts of chancery) and a hierarchy of courts.

The Development of Printing
The problem was that judges could not always talk to other judges. This then meant that all
judges decisions could be printed and therefore this made them available to everybody. This
gave us access to the judges decisions. The people who wrote up the judgements were not
the judges themselves. The judges used to pay people to go into court to write the
judgement or the judges decisions for them.
Espinasse was well known for writing up judgements. Are these judgements accurate?

Creation of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting
In 1875 this body was set up. This body still exists today. This checks the accuracy of the law
reports that are given to judges and other independent bodies. This shows that we have a
way of getting the reports out to the public and also makes sure that they are accurate
reports. This then gets sent to a judge and is read over to make sure that all documents are
accurate.
e.g. Donoghue v Stevenson (snail in the bottle) The manufacture owed a duty of care to the

, person who consumed the product. What mattered was who consumed it.

1. The Law Reports (Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales -
ICLR). Published monthly, checked by the judges before publication and contain the
argument of counsel. They are deemed therefore to be the most authoritative. SEE: Lord
Woold CJ Practice direction (judgements: Form citiation-(Supreme Court) (2001) 1WLR 194)
If the case is published by the ICLR in the law reports serious NO other citation may be used.
2. The Weekly Law Reports (Publishers:ICLR) Judges do not revise these publication,
and the representations of counsel are not included. They are in 3 volumes according to
their importantance. Volume 1 cases are unlikely to be reported in the Law Reports. Vols 2
and 3 are intended for re-publication.
3. The All England Reports (Publishers: LexiNexis Butterworths) These are normally
revised by judges but counsels arguments not included.
4. All other law reports: the specialist series, such as Criminal law reports (Crim lR),
Industrial Relations Reports, (IRL) Justice of the Peace reports (JP), etc.

The Judicature Acts 1873-75
These acts bring Equity and the Common Law together. The Common law remedy is
damages and the equitable remedy is specific performance and an injunction. Specific
performance is where you go to court and you ask the court to make someone do what they
agreed to do. This means that you can ask the court for an order for specific performance to
make the person do what they should be doing. An injunction is the opposite of this. This is
where you go to court and ask the person to stop doing what they are supposed to do. You
can only ask for an equitable remedy if you have behaved remedy. Therefore you can only
get them if you have behaved equitably. These can also be referred to as discretionary
remedies.

These Judicature Acts created the hierarchy of courts. Otherwise known as a court
structure.

The English Legal System Civil Court Structure
Separation of Power - Montesquieu
Keeping law and politics separate. This did not work as the judges were within the House of
Lords, the political side, so the judges were given the chance to either be a Lord or a Lady
which gave them the right to sit in the House of Lords.
Civil Courts

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emmaholland1003. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.73. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70055 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.73
  • (0)
  Add to cart