Question 1: Introduction/framework
A. (5p.) The answer must address the following issues (partial credit can be awarded):
- Accounting rules that are aimed at reducing earnings management typically reduce management’s
accounting flexibility/discretion (i.e., these rules are more rigid)
- Consequently, management has less opportunity to make accounting choices that make financial
statements informative (about the firm’s economic performance) [or, alternatively stated: management
has less opportunity to communicate its private information in the financial statements]
B. (5p.) The answer must address the following issues (partial credit can be awarded):
- The lemons problem implies that investors cannot distinguish between good and bad business ideas or
high-quality/low-quality firms, driving up the high-quality firm’s cost of capital
- To reduce their cost of capital, high-quality firms have an incentive to reduce the information
asymmetry between management and investors (using voluntary disclosure)
Question 2: Accounting analysis
A. (4p.) Please check pages 97-98 of the book for a list of incentives.
B. (4p.)
Allowance at beginning of year (new) = 25% x 100,000 = 25,000
Allowance at end of year (new) = 25% x 80,000 = 20,000
Bad debt expense (new) = 20,000 – 25,000 + 5,000 (write-offs) = 0
Given: Bad debt expense (old) = 2,000
Adjustments: Decrease bad debt expense (-2,000); Increase tax expense (30% x 2,000 = 600); decrease net
profit (-2,000 + 600 = -1,400)
C. (5p.)
Net debt and net asset adjustment at the beginning of 2011: + €500 million
Equity adjustment at the beginning of 2011: 0 million
Net debt (old) = 0.55 x 3,400 = 1,870 million; net debt (new) = 1,870 + 500 = 2,370 million
Net debt to net capital (new) = 2,370 / (3,400 + 500) = 0.608 (versus 0.55 (old))
Lease expense (old) = €80 million
Lease expense (new) = depreciation expense + interest expense = 500/5 + 10% x 500 = 150 million
Net profit (old) = 0.10 x (3,400 – 1,870) = 153
Net profit (new) = 153 + (80 - 150) x (1 – 0.3) = 104 million
ROE (new) = 104/(3,400 – 1,870) = 0.068 (versus 0.10 (old))
A. (5p.)
Year Development Proportion capitalized Asset
outlay
2008 154 X (1 – 0.33/2) 128.33
2007 233 X (1 – 0.33 – 0.33/2) 116,50
2006 295 X (1 – 0.67 – 0.33/2) 49.17
294,00
Adjustments:
Development asset (intangible non-current assets): (294 – 357) = -63 million decrease
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller henk12345678. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.