summary of comparative analysis of political systems
Written for
Universiteit Leiden (UL)
International Relations And Organizations
Comparative Analysis Of Political Systems
All documents for this subject (8)
Seller
Follow
bellakim
Content preview
1. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:10:30
Looking though the lens of ones
own context
2. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:12:53
According to Peace of Westphalia
and Montevideo Convention
3. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:12:47
Internal and external
4. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:14:21
Lecture 1 - Introduction
More uniformity
5. Comment Part 1 - Introduction
18 October 2020 at 18:14:37
Comparative politics: research method in political science
E.g. police force
• Combines substance and methods (depth and breadth)
6. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:14:51
Extraction of societal resources Comparison:
7. Comment • Benefits:
18 October 2020 at 18:15:03
Creation of institutions • Contextualization
• Typology
8. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:19:01 • Generate/test theories
Distinct from citizenship (legal
• Hazards:
term)
• Requires a lot of context
9. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:22:01 • Different meanings in different contexts
Socially constructed 1 • Ethnocentrism
Based on ethnicity, language, • Selection bias
religion, ideology, etc
• Stereotypes
Part 2 - States and Nations
State: formal political organization (main unit)
• Country: state + nation
• Government: set of people that manage state
2 3 • Features: territory, population, sovereignty
• Emergence:
• War theory
• French Revolution
4 7 • Centralization → standardization → national force → mobilization → differentiation →
welfare state
8 9 Nation: imagined community with territorial claim
• Nationalism: seek self-determination
,10. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:17:20
Often rooted in ethnicity
11. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:18:09
E.g. in multiethnic Yugoslavia,
politicians pushed for ethnic
homogenization
12. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:20:24
Revolutionists inherited the state
and tried to create a nation out of
different groups
10 • Push to homogenize
13. Comment
• Ethnicity: common descent (socially constructed)
18 October 2020 at 18:21:22
E.g. many former colonies in 11 • Often used for mobilization/legitimation
global south
14. Comment Which came first: nation or state?
18 October 2020 at 18:28:16
Positive connotations • Nazi Germany: Arian nation
Only countries that do not self- 12 • France: state
identity are Vatican City and 13 • Nation-building: state → nation-state
Saudi Arabia
15. Comment Part 3 - Regimes
18 October 2020 at 18:27:54
E.g. Switzerland Aristotle’s Typology of Regimes
Not feasible on large scale Public Interest Private Interests
Rule by one Monarchy Tyranny
16. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:27:35 Rule by few Aristocracy Oligarchy
Schumpeter: democratic elitism
Rule by many/all Polity Democracy
17. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:27:07
Protects majority Contemporary typology:
18. Comment 14 • Democratic regimes: rule by people, political equality
18 October 2020 at 18:26:48
15 16 • Direct vs representative
Protects minority (from tyranny of
the majority) 17 18 • Majoritarian vs liberal
19. Comment 19 • Authoritarian regimes: no competition for power
18 October 2020 at 18:30:38
20 • Military junta
Negative connotations
21 • Dictatorship
Proliferating
22 • Absolute monarchy
20. Comment 23 • One-party state
18 October 2020 at 18:29:20
E.g. Egypt, Thailand 24 • Theocracy
25 26 • Hybrid/illiberal regimes: unstable gray zone
21. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:29:26 27 28 • Totalitarian regimes: mass mobilization (ideological socialization), omnipresence
E.g. Cameroon, Russia,
Venezuela
Democracy index: Freedom House
22. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:29:37
E.g. Oman, Saudi Arabia,
Swaziland
23. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:29:46
E.g. China, Cuba, Vietnam
24. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:29:58
E.g. Iran, Vietnam
25. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:31:26
Most emerged in 3rd wave of
, democratization
Some progressing, some
regressing
26. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:31:47
Political turmoil
27. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:32:25
Now very rare (only North Korea)
E.g. Italy (Mussolini), Nazi
Germany (Hitler), Soviet Union
(Stalin), China (Mao)
28. Comment
18 October 2020 at 18:33:17
Very little privacy, system of terror
(secret police)
• Calhoun, C. (1993). Nationalism and Ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, pp.
211-239
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bellakim. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.05. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.