100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
G571 - AS Philosophy of Religion - Problem of Evil $9.67   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

G571 - AS Philosophy of Religion - Problem of Evil

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Here is an essay question for the topic: Problem of evil. Specifically focusing on hick's theodicy and his justification for the evil presented in the work.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • August 10, 2022
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
‘No ‘vale of soul making’ can justify the extent of evil and suffering we see in
the world today.’ Discuss.

The value of soul-making was proposed by an English philosopher named
John Hick. He argues that God left the world deliberately unfinished to ensure
that humans with free will would train themselves to grow into the likeness of
God. He argues that we are spiritually immature and need to act in ways to
grow into the likeness of God. However, Whether this world left undone to
make/build our soul was a good choice by an omniscient God, or if the evil
and suffering that came about cannot justify the choice will be discussed in
this essay. I believe that idea of the ‘vale of soul making’ theodicy is just not
convincing enough to justify the extent of evil and suffering we see in this
world today.

The soul-making theodicy argues that this world is where your soul is made to
develop and grow into the likeness of God: becoming good. The idea is
supported by the biblical quote “let us make man in our image, in our likeness”.
Now, this can only be made possible with free will which essentially is the idea
that we are not God’s little pets and he is not our owner. We have the option of
trying to become like God or doing bad (moral evil). Hick argued that God had
to give us free will because love has to be earned not forced. This argument
can be seen as logically accurate as humans do have that choice of doing
good or bad. It also persuasively shows that God is omnibenevolent in the
sense that we were not created like robots but have a choice. Therefore, this
freedom crucially presented in the ‘vale of soul making’ can justify the extent
of suffering and evil we see today as it explains that we choose what to do with
our actions. We are solely responsible not God, for the bad actions that we see
in the world today. However, as an omniscient God, shouldn't one know that
some humans would still choose to do bad? This convincingly criticises the
idea of a ‘vale of soul-making’ justifying evil and suffering as God creating the
world undone could be seen, in some ways, as setting it up to be filled with evil.
God would have known that people would use their freedom to choose selfish
actions resulting in moral evil. This is significant as it shows how God may have
deliberately ignored this outcome and let evil and suffering continue. Thus,
the idea of a ‘vale of soul making’ does not justify the extent of evil and
suffering in the world today.

The argument to which ‘the extent of evil and suffering’ can be justified by the
soul-making theodicy can be raised up for debate. Dostoevsky disagrees with
Hick’s ‘vale of soul making’ theodicy as he argues “that the price to pay for our
freedom is too high”. He uses a story about a boy who was punished by
getting mauled by hunting dogs after one of the dogs, who was playing with
the little boy, broke their leg. The hunting dog couldn't fulfil their job and was
seen as useless which justified the Master’s evil punishment. Also, recently an
18-year-old boy entered an elementary school in texas and shot 19 children
and two adults. Both these events can be described as truly evil and caused
immense suffering to the loved ones of the victims. This successfully points out
the flaws of a ‘vale of soul making’ world as these people who have committed
these horrendous acts have not grown or trained to become the likeness of

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller balqiisabdulle. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.67
  • (0)
  Add to cart