Summary AQA A-Level Psychology Memory: Factors Affecting the Accuracy of EyeWitness Testimony - Misleading Information Revision Notes
4 views 0 purchase
Course
Memory
Institution
AQA
AQA A-Level Psychology Memory: Factors Affecting the Accuracy of EyeWitness Testimony - Misleading Information Revision Notes
Simple and easy to understand revision/study notes on Misleading Info Affecting the Accuracy of EyeWitness Testimony - subtopic in the Memory topic in the aqa psychology ...
Factors a ecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
Misleading information: leading questions and post event discussion
An eyewitness - someone who sees something rst hand
Studies have shown that eyewitness testimony (EWT) can be distorted by leading questions &
post even discussion
Leading questions:
They point to a certain answer because of how they are phrased.
Making leading questions non leading:
Did you see the broken glass? → What did you see?
Did you see the woman hit the dog? → How did the woman behave?
How drunk was the perpetrator? → What was the perpetrator’s behaviour like?
Many of the early studies of memory demonstrated how memories are not accurate records of
our experiences. We try to t past events into our existing representations of the world
(known as schemas), making the memory more coherent or make more sense to us.
Loftus and Palmer (1974) - Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
• This Is a study aimed to investigate how leading questions in uences a witness’s memory for
that event.
• Laboratory experiment
• Independent measures design
• 45 American students
• Shown clips of a car crash on a screen
• Given a questionnaire
• One critical ‘leading question’: “How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
• Participants then split into 5 separate conditions.
• Each given a di erent leading verb: smashed, contacted, bumped, collided, hit.
Results:
• “Smashed” condition ‘remembered’ the car going at 40.5mph
• “Contacted” condition: 31.8mph
• In a 2nd study, 1 week later - “was there any broken glass?” Smashed condition - Yes
Conclusions:
• Response-bias: wording didn’t actually e ect memory. They didn’t know, they said what they
thought was expected (demand characteristics).
• Substitution explanation: the leading question actually changed the memory.
→Participants who heard the word smashed were more likely to say the had seen
broken glass when there wasn’t any.
Post event discussion:
When witnesses discuss an event afterwards, this can distort their original memory as they
combine other peoples memories with their own, reconstructing/contaminating their own
memory.
Gabbert et al (2203):
• Showed pairs of participants a video of a crime (a woman stealing money from a bag).
ff
ff fi ff fi fl
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller taylabarnett. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
