Exam (elaborations)

Voluntary Manslaughter structure for the exam

0 purchase

Course
Voluntary Manslaughter structure

Institution
AQA

This is the structure of voluntary manslaughter that can help in the exam, you will find useful summaries for the exam that you can take with you and a summary of the cases and definitions to be able yo memorise them easily.

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 16, 2022
Number of pages 6
Written in 2021/2022
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

voluntary manslaughter
unlawful killing
in any country of realm
factual causation
legal causation
diminished responsability
human being rerum natura
under queens peace
abnormality of mental funct

Study Level
BTEC
Examinator
AQA
Subject
Level 3 Extended Certificate in Applied Law
Unit
Voluntary Manslaughter structure

$11.01

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Law: unit 3-Learning aim A & B : Homicide

Murder, Voluntary Manslaughter, Invountary
Manslaughter, Corporate Manslaughter
Voluntary Manslaughter:
Unlawful killing:
Unlawful killing is causing someone's death unless it was self-defense or involved killing an
enemy in a war. It is necessary to prove that D’s acts or omissions caused V’s death. Death
must occur meaning the heart is not beating anymore or the brain stopped working intending to
look at brain-stem death. A person kept in a vegetative state is considered still alive.

Apply to the scenario:

Human being: Rerum Natura
A person has to be born fully to be murdered. A case example is A-G Ref No.3 1994 (1997),
where D stabbed his pregnant girlfriend in the face, abdomen, and back. 17 days after the
incident the woman went into premature labor. The baby died 121 days later due to premature
birth. On the death of the baby, D was charged with murder and manslaughter. The trial judge
held that he could not be convicted of murder or manslaughter since the fetus was not a human
being.

Apply to the scenario:

Under’s Queen’s peace:
Killing someone at queen’s peace when there is no war. Killing enemy soldiers is not murder,
the murder of a prisoner of war is.

Apply to the scenario:

In any country of realm:
If the crime (murder or manslaughter) is committed aboard by a British citizen they will have
their trial in England.

Apply to the scenario:

, Factual causation:
Factual causation, satisfied by the but-for test, if it wasn’t what the defendant did the victim
would have survived. If the main causation was not the defendant it is not established.
White v R (1910) -The defendant put some poison in his mother's milk to kill her. Medical
reports revealed that she died from a heart attack and not the poison. The defendant was not
liable for her murder as his act of poisoning the milk was not the cause of death.

Apply to the scenario:

Legal causation:
Legal causation looks at facts and blames considering the D’s contribution. Known as ‘de
minimum principle’. The D’s action needs to be the cause of death but must be a cause.
Defendants must contribute to death.
Kimsey (1986) -Kimsey (K) and Osbourne (O) were driving at high speeds in an extremely
close convoy. Whilst doing so, there was an accident in which O's car clipped a verge and spun
out of control, collided with the side of K's car, and went into the path of oncoming traffic.

Apply to the scenario:

Voluntary manslaughter is unlawful homicides that are NOT murder. The difference of murder
and manslaughter is the men’s rea of the D. Voluntary manslaughter is when the men’s rea of
murder is present (he had a reason to kill or hurt with intent ).

Charged with murder ----> Pleads special defense ----> special defense is successful. D is
acquainted of murder but convicted of voluntary manslaughter…..

Diminished responsibility:
This defense was set out in s2 Homicide Act 1957 as amended by S52 The Corners and
Justice Act 2009.
Under S52 D can plead this defense if, at the time of the killing he was
S52(1) Suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning:

(a) Which arose from a recognized medical condition
(b) And substantially impaired D’s ability to do any of the following in (s1A):
● To understand the nature of his conduct
● To form a rational judgment
● To exercise self-control
(c) And explains D’s actions
The burden of proving the defense is on the defendant, but to the civil standard
- on the balance of probabilities.

2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Emanuela25. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.01. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling