Summary
Samenvatting Organisational Theory And Dynamics International Business Administration
- Course
- Institution
Samenvatting Organisational Theory And Dynamics International Business Administration
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
noortjerozendaal
Reviews received
Content preview
lOMoARcPSD|15781725Chapter 1 – A brief history of organization theory
Figure 2.1: timeline ->range of ideas/thinkers the three OT perspectives depend on (p. 2).
Figure 2.2: comparison of perspectives (p. 36)
Prehistory of organization theory (1900 - 1950)
• Growing demand for knowledge from executives/consultants (->enhance
productivity) and economists/sociologists (->how did industrialization
change society?).
• Adam Smith: political economist
o Division of labor (= job specialization) creates economic efficiency (1776)
through
task differentiation and specialization (central to explanation of social
structure).
• Karl Marx: economic philosopher and revolutionary
o Survival needs ->economic order ->economic efficiencies of collective
labor and
social structures that support it (e.g., labor division).
o Economic base is subject to power relations between interests of capital of
labor.
▪ Excess profit ->social conflict (capitalists vs. workers) ->intensifies
due to demands for profitability ->conflict intensifies and is subject to
laws of economic competition.
▪ Capitalists define labor as cost of production = commodification -
>exploitation of labor by capitalists and alienation of laborers.
o Inspiration for critical theory ->focus on social conflict and dynamics of
change.
• Émile Durkheim: sociologist
o Division of labor and addition of hierarchy and task interdependence
(related to
social structure).
o Proposed informal organization to address sociability of workers -
>organizational culture.
• Max Weber: sociologist
o Authority structure ->first: traditional or charismatic authority, post-
industrialization:
rational-legal authority.
▪ Traditional: inherited status; nepotism.
▪ Charismatic: heroic or exemplary leader; personality cults.
▪ Rational-legal: merit-based selection driven by rationally
formulated rules and laws ->theory of bureaucracy ->iron cage.
▪ Formal rationality (follow rules) vs. substantive rationality (questioning
involved).
o Importance of culture in organizations highlighted ->symbolic perspective.
• Frederick Winslow Taylor: engineer and manager
o Psychological motivation and technical aspects of work ->efficiency.
o Scientific management theory: use of work standards/methods to achieve
targets.
▪ Applying standards and principles based on scientific
research/experimentation
->higher wages, but lower production costs ->avoid social conflict.
▪ Efficiency movement.
▪ Taylorism (vs. Fordism).
▪ Technical efficiency and formal rationality.
• Mary Parker Follett: social reformer and government/management consultant
o Management theory based on self-government ->workplace democracy
and non-
hierarchical structure: power with (not over) people.
o Power = source of creative energy (vs. Marx).
o Conflict resolution: domination, compromise, integration.
, lOMoARcPSD|15781725
• Henry Fayol: engineer, CEO, and administrative theorist
o Administrative principles: span of control (optimal #subordinates to be
overseen),
unity of command (report to one boss), delegation (standard operating
procedures), departmentalization, scalar principle (follow chain of
command), esprit de corps (strong culture; unity of sentiment and
harmony).
• Chester Barnard: executive and management theorist
, lOMoARcPSD|15781725
o Cooperation, goal communication, attention to worker motivation.
▪ Durkheim, Follett, Taylor.
Modern organization theory (1960s and 1970s)
• Enlightenment / Age of Reason ->Descartes, Locke, Kant.
• Three theories: general systems, socio-technical systems, contingency theory.
• General systems theory (GST): integrate all scientific knowledge; all
phenomena are related in vast hierarchy (table 2.1).
o Social organization: system composed of interacting departmental
subsystems inhabiting a supersystem in which it interacts with other
socially organized systems.
o A system is greater than the sum of its parts ->holistic understanding
needed.
o Levels of analysis problem ->what will you define as system of interest?
o Requisite variety: lower-level systems are not as complex to map onto
higher-order
systems.
• Socio-technical systems theory: technology changes influence social structure.
o Example: autonomous work groups ->increased satisfaction -
>performance.
o Suggestion: redesign production systems that allow for teamwork,
multiskilling, and
self-management.
o Organizations as social systems; work design consequences; labor
division that increases variety.
o Opposed to scientific management, but both want to overcome
disempowering.
• Contingency theory: what works best depends on factors like
environment, goals, technology, and people involved.
Symbolic perspective (1980s)
• Subjective beliefs about reality affect behavior.
o Culture, enactment, institutionalization.
• Social construction theory (Berger & Luckmann) : social world is negotiated,
organized, and constructed by our interpretations of reality, which are
communicated through symbols. Symbolism (not structure) creates and
maintains social order.
o Interpretations in the social construction of reality are based
on implicit understandings formed intersubjectively (= social
aspect).
o Three mechanisms: externalization (meaning carried by and
communicated via symbols), objectifications (intersubjectively
produced understandings), internalization (unquestioningly
accepting the intersubjectively externalized and objectified
understandings of a social group as reality).
o Socialization: awareness of social construction processes.
• Enactment theory (Weick): organizations exist only in the minds of its
members
“organizing, not organization”.
o Organization occurs through enactment of beliefs about what is
real ->sensemaking: creating truth by organizing experience in
ways that produce understanding.
o Organizational cognition.
• Institutions and institutionalization (Senznick vs. Meyer & Rowan: more
symbolic)
o Co-optation: the process of absorbing new elements into the leadership or
policy-
determining structure of an organization as a means of averting threats
, lOMoARcPSD|15781725
to its stability or existence.
o Organization: rational tool for achieving economic efficiency.
o Social legitimacy.
o Institutional myth: mask inefficiency from public behavior, e.g., financial
crisis.
• Culture
o Thick description (Geertz’s method) provided a symbolic variant of
traditional
ethnography that focuses on meaning behind daily events.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller noortjerozendaal. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now