100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
‘It is possible to resolve the apparent conflicts between divine attributes’. Discuss(40) $4.63
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. OCR
  4.  
  5. Religious Studies
  6.  
  7. The Nature of God/Attributes of God

Exam (elaborations)

‘It is possible to resolve the apparent conflicts between divine attributes’. Discuss(40)
 2 purchases
  • Course
  • The Nature of God/Attributes of God
  • Institution
  • OCR
  • Book
  • Oxford A Level Religious Studies for OCR

This document includes OCR A Level Religious Studies - Nature of God/ Attributes of God Essay. This is an example of an essay that could potentially come up. Some of the essays include summaries. I am an A* student and these essays are all at an A-A* standard. If you need further help, please conta...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

Document information

  • August 17, 2022
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • attributes of god
  • nature of god
  • ocr
  • alevel
  • religious studies
  • boethius
  • anselm
  • richard swinburne
  • st anselm
  • monk
  • rs
  • a

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • OCR
  • Religious Studies
  • The Nature of God/Attributes of God
All documents for this subject (7)

Seller

avatar-seller
kadjis

Reviews received

Content preview

‘it is possible to resolve the apparent conflicts between divine attributes’.Assess[40]



This is really two points in one, which is very annoying from the exam board!
Whether or not it is possible to resolve the conflicts depends on what you focus on. All
the philosophers we have studied would argue that it IS possible in some way – but
Some might argue that we will never understand it. So the question really is: Have you
found any of the philosophers persuasive? In this case it might be best to focus on
whether or not you think Boethius, Anselm or Swinburne provided the best way of
resolving the conflicts between God’s omniscience (knows our future) and God’s
omnibenevolence (gives free will and judges fairly). Again – look at your essays/plans
and my feedback.

Whether or not it is possible to resolve the apparent conflicts between divine attributes is
basically the same as having any of the philosophers(boethius, anselm, swinburne, Decartes)
have any of them solved the problem.

The conflict between divine attributes such as omniscience and omnibenevolence and
human free will has been studied for centuries by philosophers such as Richard
Swinburne, Boethius and St Anselm with each of them coming to different conclusions
depending on how they define these divine attributes. Boethius as well as Anselm,
through understanding God’s eternal nature as being timeless rather than everlasting,
argued that the conflict between human free will and God’s omniscience had been
solved. On the other hand, Swinburne has argued that through understanding God as
everlasting we can resolve the conflict between God's attributes. Through critical
analysis, it will become clear that Swinburne has successfully resolved the divine
conflict between divine attributes but Anselm and Boethius have not. It is thus overall
possible to resolve the divine conflict but only by undertaking Swinburne's
understanding of time.

Boethius has failed to resolve the apparent conflict between divine attributes.
Boethius presents an incoherent idea by interpreting God's eternal nature as timeless.
Boethius argues that God does not see past, present and the future in temporal terms
as humans do but rather simultaneously ‘’as though from a lofty peak’’. The fact that
God can see us making those choices, and knows what our future choices and their
consequences will be, does not restrict our freedom to act freely. Ideas of past, present
and future work differently for God. We can still be praised or blamed for the moral
choices that we make in time because God’s knowledge of our choices is not
foreknowledge (knowledge in advance) as there is no ‘in advance’ for God. Thus God
cannot be accused of a lack of wisdom for not realizing Adam and Eve would betray him
nor for a lack of morality for allowing evil dictators to be born. As time occurs
simultaneously for God, Boethius claimed that we, therefore, have genuine free choice

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kadjis. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.63. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66184 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$4.63  2x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added