100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Microeconomic essay plans: market failure, market structures, government intervention, inequality $6.91   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Microeconomic essay plans: market failure, market structures, government intervention, inequality

 34 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

these notes helped me get an A*, when I was predicted a C! summarised notes on all aspects of microeconomics apart from the labour market. my notes are constructed in for and against arguments to help form essay plans. there are 37 for and against tables!! + I've added some industry profiles with...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 38  pages

  • September 3, 2022
  • 38
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Evaluation considerations:

Intervention:

 Effective for issue?
o Price elasticity of demand (coefficient of low elasticity – inelastic, bc
ppls purchases are likely to be affected)
o How easy to switch to alternatives X PED eg. Tax on plastic should
cause  demand for substitute recycled plastic} depends on
whether recycled plastic has capacity to meet demand
o PES
 Equitable? Regressive?
 Disincentives? Eg. Investment  employment 
o Unintended consequences = gov failure
o Allocative efficient = price = costs
o Black market?

 Conflict w other policy objectives?
 Long term vs short term
 Market mechanism solve over time
 The extent that a mixture is needed




POLICIES TO REDUCE INEQUALITY

Evaluation points
 Policy myopia – governments unlikely to choose long term improvements bc they need
short term gains in elections



MINIMUM WAGE

UK 8th most flexible labour market  unemployment likely BUT underemployment more
likely bc flexible contracts
For success:
Demand must be relatively inelastic
Done regionally? standard of living varies from London than north, this is what living wage accounts
for
For Against

o  pay differentials   income inequality} o Unemployment} depends on elasticity,
sustains minimum earnings closing gap workers who are on minimum wage likely to
o  labour supply  employment  voluntary be in low skilled service sector which does
unemployment have demand elasticity  unemployment
o Wider pool of applicants ensures likely
greater allocation of resources as o Accelerates substitution of capital
firms can pick best suited candidate, o Youth lose out
rather than settling for only option   Firms pay according to MRP,
productivity youths =  MRP
o  welfare spending from  in benefits   HYSTERISIS long term
o  productivity barriers to entry, hard to get
o efficiency wage theory}  back into work w no
motivation &  employee retention experience (price out labour

, from their highest skilled leaving market)
o substitution effect work becomes o  investment} unlikely bc UK has lowest rate
more attractive than leisure   of cooperation tax in G7 25% in 2023
hours worked} income effect may o eat into dynamic efficiency
reverse this by which ppl receive o firms relocate
more income for same effort  cut o UK economy lose export competitiveness if
back hours higher costs = higher prices} worsens trade
o counter exploitative wage making power of deficit
monopsony’s employment o Doesn’t account for regional minimum
wages
o Wage inflation
o Developing countries have  informal
economy  implemented unlikely to have an
effect



TAX REFORMS -  PROGRESSIVE (increase highest income tax bracket / increase
minimum threshold)  regressive reduce fuel duty / VAT

£!50k = 45% increase / make another bracket
Direct & indirect
For Against
 Less gov revenue
  means tested benefit spending for Laffer curve – distorting incentives to earn
poor – More income tax revenue more income, take on more risks, increase
(biggest tax receipt contributor for UK productivity  less government revenue
government)  Disincentive to work, higher taxes =
  welfare spending – improve schools + less attractive to work bc reduces the
opportunities opportunity cost of leisure
 Spent on training schemes – to increase (substitution effect)
human capital potential (increase MRP)
  productivity through income effect – Tax avoidance – recent non-dom Richi Sunak
higher taxes reduce income  ppl work wife £11m dividends missed from taxation
more hours to maintain income




BENEFITS increase – child benefit

Means tested – to those who need most
Eg. Universal credit 2013 – to unemployed but must be willing to take a job offer, designed to
still receive some benefits as income increases to avoid poverty trap} apply on line adverse
selection /asymmetric info} most in need won’t have access to online
Benefits in kind – non-cash - provision of free publics services eg. Education and healthcare /
free childcare

Gov offer 30 hours of free childcare per week BUT only if in paid work not helping women get
into work

Universal credit
Cons.
 Caps could harm large families and living in London areas
 Ppl have to take a job offered including “workfare schemes” when ppl work 6 months
unpaid, firms may exploit this
 Ppl used to weekly payments not monthly – problems short of cash end of month = debt
problems

For Against
 Allow struggling households to afford a  Increase fiscal deficit – opportunity
decent standard of living cost} not actually solving the problem
long term just subsiding it

,  Poverty / unemployment trap
- To be effective:  Paradox of poverty
- Remove benefits in increments as - When unemployed find job and
income increases become unqualified they then need to
pay for transport, childcare, leaving
less money from being unemployed
Perpetuating poverty




WINDFALL TAX to oil and gas companies

One off tax levied on a company / industry when they benefit from external economic
circumstances out of their control causing greater than average supernormal profits,
Oil and gas companies are benefiting from the high prices due to excess demand Ukraine Russia
conflict

Bp £5bn / Shell £7.3bn profit first Q2
For Against
 Hypothecated revenue raised can go  No short term / immediate impact on
to struggling families} reverse firms’ production, firms will still
regressive nature continue to produce at profit max
 19 (BP & Shell) oil and gas companies levels
have been net recipients of tax-payers  Reduce profits =  dynamic efficiency}
money from tax reliefs for investment needed in the oil / gas industry with
and decommissioning search for more sustainable methods
in North Sea} hit contribution to low
carbon transition
 Exploration in North Sea is not
compatible w UK’s climate
commitments
 UK gas and oil companies pay 40%
cooperation tax already
Hurts pensioners} 1/10 of BP and shells shares
are owned by UK pensioners, providing
important dividend income for pensioners




Maximum wages / BONUS CAP FOR EXECUTIVES

For Against

Labour party 2017 20:1 limit on gaps in companies  Brain drains – top executive
 Reduce multiplier from wealth leave UK labour supply, loss of
Lower housing price pressures innovation
 Reduce divorce of ownership  Higher pay incentive effect which
 More equity in labour market promotes risk taking,
Improve productivity building motivation productivity
 dynamic efficiency’s as money that would be  Difficult to enforce
spent on executives is reinvested into quality Hard to know what rate to cap} requires
companies to publish pay ratios  need
John lewis successfully dispersed bonuses and share legislation in tandem
ownership  lower incomes have higher propensity to Would require perfect info
consumer  positive multiplier  Tax evaders will find a way
around

, LEGISLATION – anti discrimination, South Africa cap on 40% workers must be SA

For Against

- Increase labour market participation from - Costly
ethnic} 2019 4% white unemployed, 8% - FDI / companies move to other countries
were Bangladesh / Pakistani & 8% black




EDUCATION SPENDING} tackling root cause for long term

For Against

- Improve MRPs - Costly
- Higher productivity - Don’t solve short term eg. Recession
- Higher wages reducing unemployment - Fiscal budget deficit

T levels




Policies to reduce poverty in DEVELOPING
countries
For Against

 education spending:  Brain drains
foreign aid
Diversification of economies
Deregulate & privatisation




POLICIES TO REDUCE REGIONAL INEQUALITY



1. Grants / Subsidise business start ups
2. Tax relief to businesses in northern
3. Spending on transport
4. Supply side reforms in education and training schemes
5. Rent cap to London to reduce geographical mobility


POLICIES TO REDUCE RELATIVE POVERTY

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller charlotteconnelly26. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.91
  • (0)
  Add to cart